Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. In the first Lok Sabha, the single largest party in the opposition was the Swatantra Party. 2. In the Lok Sabha, a "Leader of the Opposition" was recognised for the first time in 1969. 3. In the Lok Sabha, if a party does not have a minimum of 75 members, its leader cannot be recognised as the Leader of the Opposition. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B because only statement 2 is correct.
**Statement 1 is incorrect**: The Swatantra Party became the single-largest opposition party in the fourth Lok Sabha (1967[1]–71) with 44 seats, not the first Lok Sabha. The first Lok Sabha was from 1952-1957, while the Swatantra Party's emergence as the largest opposition party occurred much later in 1967.
**Statement 2 is correct**: In the Lok Sabha, a "Leader of the Opposition" was recognised for the first time in 1969[2]. This marks the formal recognition of this constitutional position.
**Statement 3 is incorrect**: While the document mentions a minimum of 75 members in the Lok Sabha[3], the actual requirement is 10% of the total strength (approximately 55 members in a 545-member house), not 75 members. The document does not provide complete information to verify the exact threshold, but the commonly accepted rule is one-tenth of the total strength.
Therefore, only statement 2 is correct, making option B the right answer.
Sources- [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatantra_Party
- [2] https://employmentnews.gov.in/NewEmp/MoreContentNew.aspx?n=SpecialContent&k=30302
- [3] https://employmentnews.gov.in/NewEmp/MoreContentNew.aspx?n=SpecialContent&k=30302
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Polity meets History' trap. While it looks like obscure trivia about the Swatantra Party, it is actually a test of the '10% Rule' (Quorum/Recognition convention). If you knew the standard parliamentary convention for recognition is 10% of the House (55 seats, not 75), you could solve this instantly without knowing anything about 1969 or the Swatantra Party.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Swatantra Party the single largest opposition party in the First Lok Sabha (1952–1957)?
- Statement 2: Was a "Leader of the Opposition" in the Lok Sabha first officially recognised in 1969?
- Statement 3: Is there a rule in the Lok Sabha requiring a party to have at least 75 members for its leader to be recognised as the Leader of the Opposition?
- Explicitly states when Swatantra became the single largest opposition party — in the fourth Lok Sabha, not the first.
- Gives the seat count and frames the achievement as occurring in a later Lok Sabha (fourth Lok Sabha).
- Specifies the exact Lok Sabha and years: 'fourth Lok Sabha (1967–71)', tying the 'single-largest opposition' label to 1967–71.
- Provides the seat total (44) confirming the magnitude of its position at that time.
- Connects the party's 'single largest party in the opposition in the Lok Sabha' status to the 1967 General Elections.
- Reinforces that the milestone occurred in 1967, implying it was not in the First Lok Sabha (1952–57).
This snippet explicitly records the claim as a test item (statement 1) about the Swatantra Party being the single largest opposition in the First Lok Sabha, indicating the question is contested in standard textbooks.
A student could take this as a prompt to check primary data (party formation date and 1952 seat tallies) to verify the claim.
States that in the first four Lok Sabha elections (1952, 1957, 1962, 1967) the Congress secured the required majority, implying opposition parties had limited seats in 1952–57.
A student could use this general rule to infer that the single largest opposition would have been a relatively small party and therefore check which opposition parties existed and their seat counts in 1952.
Explains that opposition parties in the 1950s had only 'token representation' in the Lok Sabha, a pattern relevant to evaluating any claim about a 'single largest' opposition party in that period.
Use this pattern to focus investigation on which opposition parties had non-negligible seat counts in 1952 (e.g., CPI, PSP, Jana Sangh) and compare them.
Gives a concrete example: Bharatiya Jana Sangh secured only 3 Lok Sabha seats in 1952, illustrating how small some non-Congress parties were.
A student can compare such specific 1952 seat numbers (here for Jana Sangh) with seat counts of other opposition parties to see which was largest.
Notes the Swatantra Party's political fortunes in the 1960s and 1970s, implying its relevance is later than the immediate post-1952 period.
A student could combine this with basic external facts (formation date / first election contested) to judge whether Swatantra existed or was electorally relevant in 1952.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.