Question map
With reference to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, consider the following statements : While any resolution for the removal of the lok sabha is under consideration 1. He/She shall not preside. 2. He/She shall not have the right to speak. 3. He/She shall not be entitled to vote on the resolution in the first instance. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A (1 only).
When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker is under consideration of the House, he/she cannot preside at the sitting of the House, though he/she may be present.[1] This makes **Statement 1 correct**.
However, he/she can speak and take part in the proceedings of the House at such a time and vote in the first instance, though not in the case of an equality of votes.[1] This clearly establishes that **Statement 2 is incorrect** (the Speaker has the right to speak) and **Statement 3 is incorrect** (the Speaker is entitled to vote in the first instance).
The Constitution provides these rights to ensure the Speaker can defend themselves during removal proceedings. The only restriction is on presiding over the House during such deliberations, which ensures procedural fairness. The Speaker's voting right is limited only in case of tie-breaking votes, not on the first instance of voting on the resolution itself.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 230
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Sitter' directly from the standard text (Laxmikanth, Ch 23). The entire question is answered by a single paragraph on page 230. If you got this wrong, your static revision is critically weak. No web search was needed; this is pure static polity.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is under consideration, is the Speaker prohibited from presiding over the House?
- Statement 2: When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is under consideration, is the Speaker prohibited from speaking in the House?
- Statement 3: When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is under consideration, is the Speaker not entitled to vote on that resolution in the first instance?
- Text explicitly says the Speaker "cannot preside at the sitting of the House" while a removal resolution is under consideration.
- Also specifies the Speaker may be present, may speak and take part, and may vote in the first instance — clarifying the limited nature of the prohibition.
- Describes the parallel situation for the Rajya Sabha Chairman: presence and participation allowed during removal consideration but without voting, highlighting the general rule about presiding officers not presiding during their own removal proceedings.
- Provides a contrast that helps interpret the Lok Sabha Speaker's voting/participation rights mentioned elsewhere.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.