Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. In the election for Lok Sabha or State Assembly, the winning candidate must get at least 50 percent of the votes polled, to be declared elected. 2. According to the provisions laid down in the Constitution of India, in Lok Sabha, the Speaker's post goes to the majority party and the Deputy Speaker's to the Opposition. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because both statements are incorrect.
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** India follows the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system for Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections. Under this system, the candidate who secures the highest number of votes (simple plurality) wins, regardless of whether they obtain 50% or more of the total votes polled. There is no constitutional or legal requirement for a winning candidate to secure at least 50% of votes.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** The Constitution only requires that the Speaker should be a member of the House[1], and the Speaker is elected by "a simple majority of members present and voting in the House."[1] While usually, the speaker comes from the ruling party (or ruling alliance), while the post of Deputy Speaker goes to the opposition party (or opposition alliance)[2], this is merely a convention and not a constitutional provision. There have been certain exceptional cases in this regard.[2] The Constitution does not mandate that the Speaker's post must go to the majority party or the Deputy Speaker's to the Opposition.
Therefore, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct.
Sources- [2] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 232
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Source Authority' trap. Statement 1 tests the basic definition of the FPTP system (NCERT level), while Statement 2 tests your ability to distinguish between the 'Constitution' and 'Parliamentary Convention'. If a political practice feels like a 'gentleman's agreement' (like giving the Dy. Speaker post to the Opposition), it is rarely written in the Constitution.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In Indian Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections, is a winning candidate required to obtain at least 50% of the votes polled to be declared elected?
- Statement 2: According to the Constitution of India, does the Lok Sabha Speaker's post go to the majority party?
- Statement 3: According to the Constitution of India, does the Lok Sabha Deputy Speaker's post go to the Opposition?
States that Lok Sabha and State Assembly elections use the first‑past‑the‑post (FPTP) system where the candidate with the maximum votes wins.
A student can combine this rule with the definition of FPTP (plurality wins) to suspect that >50% is not required and then check constituency results.
Explicitly says the winning candidate need not secure a majority of the votes and names the method as First Past the Post/Plurality system.
Use this explicit statement to conclude that under the prescribed method a simple plurality (not necessarily ≥50%) suffices; verify by sampling constituency tallies.
Provides a clear example/pattern comment that a candidate can win without securing even 50% of the total votes.
A student could look up real constituency vote shares (e.g., multi‑candidate contests) on an election map to find instances where winners had <50%.
Gives a concrete constituency example where the declared winner had about 50.82% and was declared elected because they had more votes than others—illustrating the plurality principle in practice.
Compare this with other constituency result tables to find winners with <50% and thus test whether ≥50% is a general requirement.
Describes a contrasting electoral method (Single Transferable Vote) where a minimum quota is required to be declared winner, showing that majority/quota requirements are system‑dependent.
A student can use this contrast to reason that any majority/quota requirement would be explicitly stated for the system in use; therefore, check whether such a quota is part of the FPTP rules used for Lok Sabha/Assemblies.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.