Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect Bookmarked
Loading…
Q53 (IAS/2018) Polity & Governance › Federalism & Emergency Provisions › President's Rule provisions Official Key

If the President of India exercises his power as provided under Article 356 of the Constitution in respect of a particular State, then

Result
Your answer:  ·  Correct: B
Explanation

When President's Rule is imposed under Article 356, the President can declare that the powers of the state legislature are to be exercised by the Parliament.[2] This is the direct constitutional consequence of invoking Article 356.

Option A is incorrect because the State Legislative Assembly should not be dissolved either by the Governor or the President before the proclamation issued under article 356(1) has been laid before Parliament and it has had an opportunity to consider it.[3] The assembly is typically kept in suspended animation, not automatically dissolved.

Option C is incorrect as there is no provision for suspending Article 19 (fundamental rights relating to freedoms) under President's Rule. Article 19 is suspended only during a National Emergency under Article 352, not under Article 356.

Option D is misleading because while Parliament exercises legislative powers for the state, it is Parliament that makes the laws, not the President directly. The powers of the Legislature of the State shall be exercisable by or under the authority of Parliament[4], making option B the most accurate constitutional position.

Sources
  1. [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 17: Emergency Provisions > Consequences of President's Rule > p. 179
  2. [2] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 17: Emergency Provisions > Consequences of President's Rule > p. 179
  3. [3] https://legalaffairs.gov.in/sites/default/files/Article%20356%20of%20the%20Constitution.pdf
  4. [4] https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s37a68443f5c80d181c42967cd71612af1/uploads/2025/03/202503192075705532.pdf
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
52%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. If the President of India exercises his power as provided under Article 356 of the Constitution in respect of a particular State, then […
At a glance
Origin: Books + Current Affairs Fairness: Low / Borderline fairness Books / CA: 2.5/10 · 5/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

This is a 'Text of the Constitution' question disguised as a conceptual one. It demands you distinguish between the immediate constitutional effect (Legislative power shifts to Parliament) and the subsequent administrative possibilities (Parliament delegating to President). It punishes loose reading of Laxmikanth.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
When the President of India proclaims President's Rule under Article 356 of the Constitution, is the State Legislative Assembly automatically dissolved?
Origin: Web / Current Affairs Fairness: CA heavy Web-answerable

Web source
Presence: 5/5
"The Legislative Assembly was kept in the suspended animation."
Why this source?
  • Gives an example where President's Rule did not dissolve the assembly but left it in 'suspended animation'.
  • Shows that proclamation can result in the assembly being kept intact rather than automatically dissolved.
Web source
Presence: 5/5
"The State Legislative Assembly should not be dissolved either by the Governor or the President before the proclamation issued under article 356(1) has been laid before Parliament and it has had an opportunity to consider it."
Why this source?
  • Explains a constitutional safeguard that the State Legislative Assembly should not be dissolved before Parliament considers the proclamation.
  • Implies dissolution is not an automatic consequence of a proclamation and requires procedural consideration.
Web source
Presence: 4/5
"a proclamation under article 356 of the Constitution was issued on 30-1-1988 by the President in respect of the State of Tamil Nadu and the State Assembly was dissolved."
Why this source?
  • Provides an example where a proclamation under Article 356 did result in the dissolution of the State Assembly.
  • Indicates that dissolution can occur but is not uniquely or universally automatic on every proclamation.

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 92: World Constitutions > 2018 TEST PAPER > p. 754
Strength: 4/5
“Whenever the Legislative Assembly is dissolved, the Speaker shall vacate his/ ber office immediately. Which of the statements given above is/ are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (e) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 • 8. If the President of India exercises his power as provided under Article 356 of the Constitution in respect of a particular State, then • (a) the Assembly of the State is automatically dissolved. • (b) the powers of the Legislature of that State shall be exercisable by or under the authority of the Parliament. • (c) Article 19 is suspended in that State. • (d) the President can make laws relating to that State.”
Why relevant

This snippet lists as a discrete option the claim that 'the Assembly of the State is automatically dissolved' when Article 356 is exercised, indicating that automatic dissolution is a contested/legal question.

How to extend

A student could treat this as a hypothesis to test against constitutional text/case law or other sources that distinguish suspension vs dissolution.

Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 7: FEDERALISM > Role of Governors and President's Rule > p. 166
Strength: 5/5
“Powers and role of the Governor become controversial for one more reason. One of the most controversial articles in the Constitution is Article 356, which provides for President's rule in any State. This provision is to be applied, when 'a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution.' It results in the takeover of the State government by the Union government. The President's proclamation has to be ratified by Parliament. President's rule can be extended till three years. The Governor has the power to recommend the dismissal of the State government and suspension or dissolution of State assembly.”
Why relevant

States that the Governor has power to recommend 'suspension or dissolution of State assembly' when recommending dismissal — implying both are possible outcomes rather than an automatic consequence.

How to extend

One could use this rule to infer President's Rule may lead to either suspension or dissolution depending on recommendation and then check constitutional practice or precedents for which occurs when.

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > ISSUES IN THE GOVERNOR'S FUNCTIONING > p. 323
Strength: 4/5
“- to dissolution of the Legislative Assembly. The advice of a Chief Minister, enjoying majority support in the Assembly, is normally binding on the Governor. However, where the Chief Minister had lost such support, some Governors refused to dissolve the Legislative Assembly on his advice, while others in similar situations, accepted his advice, and dissolved the Assembly. • 5. In Recommending President's Rule: In a number of situations of political instability in the States, the Governors recommended President's rule under Article 356 without exhausting all possible steps under the Constitution to induct or maintain a stable government.”
Why relevant

Notes that Governors have recommended President's Rule and sometimes dissolved assemblies (or failed to exhaust options), showing dissolution has been a separate discretionary action in practice.

How to extend

A student might combine this with knowledge of the Governor’s role and chronology to see whether dissolution follows automatically or is a separate act by Governor/President.

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT > p. 186
Strength: 3/5
“The 104th Constitution Amendment Act of 2019 has not extended further the nomination of Anglo·lndian members to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies. In other words, the amendment discontinued the provision of special representation of the Anglo·lndian community in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies by nomination. Consequently, this provision ceased to have effect on the 25th January 2020. Further, where a n assembly is dissolved, the members cease to be qualified to vote in the presidential elect ion , even if fresh elections to th e dissolved assembly are not held before the preSidentia l election. The Constitution provides that there shall be uniformity in the scale of representation of different states as well as parity between the states as a whole and the Union at the election of the President.”
Why relevant

Observes that 'where an assembly is dissolved, the members cease to be qualified to vote', treating 'dissolution' as a specific legal state with consequences distinct from mere imposition of rule.

How to extend

Use the distinct legal consequences of 'dissolved assembly' to check whether Article 356's proclamation itself enacts those consequences or whether a separate step is required.

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 17: Emergency Provisions > Use of Article 356 > p. 181
Strength: 3/5
“Since 1950, the President's Rule has been imposed on more than 125 occasions. Further, on a number of occasions, the President's Rule has been imposed in an arbitrary manner for political or personal reasons. Hence, Article 356 has become one of the most controversial and most criticised provision of the Constitution. For the first time, the President's Rule was imposed in Punjab in 1951. By now, all most all the states have been brought under the President's Rule, once or twice or more. When general elections were held to the Lok Sabha in 1977 after the internal emergency, the ruling Congress party lost and the Janata Party came to power.”
Why relevant

Explains Article 356 results in takeover by Union government and requires Parliament ratification and can be extended, suggesting a structured process rather than an instantaneous, automatic effect like dissolution.

How to extend

A student could combine this process-oriented description with the Governor's powers to infer that dissolution is not necessarily automatic but part of varied outcomes under Article 356.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CAPF · 2010 · Q120 Relevance score: 8.75

If the President of India exercises his power as provided under Article 356 of the Constitution of India in respect of a particular state, then :

CAPF · 2025 · Q28 Relevance score: 2.09

From amongst the following, identify the correct option that captures the changes made in Article 74(1) of the Constitution of India through the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976.

IAS · 2004 · Q59 Relevance score: 2.04

Which one of the following Articles of the Constitution of India says that the executive power of every State shall be so exercised as not to impede or prejudice the exercise of the executive power of the Union ?

CDS-II · 2019 · Q41 Relevance score: 1.67

1%'hich provision of the Constitu- tion of India provides that the President shall not be answer- able to any Court in India for the exercise of powers of His office?

CAPF · 2015 · Q28 Relevance score: 1.52

Under Article 355 of the Constitution of India, it is the duty of the Union to :