Question map
With reference to the British colonial rule in India, consider the following statements : 1. Mahatma Gandhi was instrumental in the abolition of the system of 'indentured labour'. 2. In Lord Chelmsford's War Conference', Mahatma Gandhi did not support the resolution on recruiting Indians for World War. 3. Consequent upon the breaking of Salt Law by Indian people, the Indian National Congress was declared illegal by the colonial rulers. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option B (statements 1 and 3 only).
Statement 1 is correct. Mahatma Gandhi strongly advocated against the indentured labour system, calling for its abolition because it robbed Indians of their national self-respect[1], and he compared the system to a state bordering on slavery, using the expression 'semi-slavery'[2]. His efforts were instrumental in ending this system.
Statement 3 is correct. During the [3]Civil Disobedience Movement following the Salt March, the Congress was declared illegal by the British authorities. As thousands broke the salt law across the country, manufactured salt, boycotted foreign cloth, and peasants refused to pay taxes, the colonial government began arresting Congress leaders, leading to the organization being banned[4].
Statement 2 is incorrect. At Lord Chelmsford's War Conference in 1918, Mahatma Gandhi actually supported the British war effort and the resolution on recruiting Indians for World War I, contrary to what the statement claims. This makes option B (statements 1 and 3 only) the correct answer.
Sources- [3] Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 15: Struggle for Swaraj > The Second Civil Disobedience Movement > p. 289
- [4] India and the Contemporary World โ II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > The Independence Day Pledge, 26 January 1930 > p. 40
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Personality Evolution' trap. Statement 2 tests the counter-intuitive phase of Gandhi (the 'Loyalist' era of WWI) against his popular 'Non-violent' image. Statement 3 is standard NCERT history. The key to solving this wasn't knowing everything, but knowing the *one* exception to Gandhi's pacifism during 1918.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did Mahatma Gandhi play an instrumental role in abolishing the system of indentured labour under British colonial rule in India?
- Statement 2: At Lord Chelmsford's War Conference during British colonial rule in India, did Mahatma Gandhi oppose the resolution to recruit Indians for the World War?
- Statement 3: Was the Indian National Congress declared illegal by the British colonial rulers as a consequence of Indians breaking the Salt Law (Salt Satyagraha) during British colonial rule in India?
Describes Gandhi's direct involvement in labour disputes (Ahmedabad textile mill workers) and peasant agitations, showing he acted on labour/peasant grievances.
A student could check whether Gandhi's labour interventions included campaigns against indenture or whether they influenced colonial labour policy or public opinion about indentured systems.
Gandhi criticised industrial machinery for displacing labour and promoted self-reliance (charkha), indicating his broader concern with labour welfare and exploitation.
Use this pattern to investigate whether Gandhi's rhetoric and programs explicitly targeted systems like indenture as forms of labour exploitation.
Notes Gandhi's empathy with the labouring poor and his lifestyle that enabled connection with them, suggesting he was positioned to mobilise for labour causes.
A student could examine whether Gandhi translated this empathy into organised campaigns or political pressure specifically against indenture practices or laws enabling them.
Provides details on the scale, destinations, and contractual nature of indentured labour from India, clarifying what abolition would have needed to address (mass emigration under contract).
Combine this factual picture with Gandhi's known campaigns/timelines to see if his activism targeted the administrative/mechanistic aspects that sustained indenture.
Frames indentured migration as a major nineteenth-century form of coercive labour tied to colonial economic structures, highlighting the kind of systemic practice an abolition campaign would confront.
Use this to assess whether Gandhi's political programmes (mass movements, negotiations) were aimed at dismantling such colonial labour structures or primarily at political independence and local reforms.
States Gandhi had at times 'been at the forefront in offering cooperation in the British war effort' and 'even offered to encourage recruitment of Indians into the British Indian forces' โ an example showing Gandhi sometimes supported recruitment.
A student could check the date of this example vs. the date of Chelmsford's War Conference to see if the supportive stance matches that period or indicates changing positions.
Explains Gandhi's later caution: he limited satyagraha and argued Congress objective 'cannot be carried to the extent of their participation in the war' โ a general rule that Gandhi opposed mass Indian participation under certain political conditions.
Compare this stance's timing with the Chelmsford conference date to judge whether Gandhi would likely oppose a recruitment resolution at that moment.
The Congress decided to support the war effort conditionally (post-war constituent assembly and responsible government now) โ shows the Congress/Gandhi position was conditional, not an outright and permanent refusal to recruitment.
A student can test whether the Chelmsford resolution met those Congress conditions; if not, that makes opposition more plausible.
Summarises differing views within Congress and notes Gandhi 'was for unconditional support to Britain's war efforts' at one recorded moment โ an example of Gandhi's positions varying by context.
Use chronology: determine when Gandhi expressed unconditional support and whether that pre/postdates the Chelmsford conference to infer likely stance then.
Gandhi argued 'no Indian participation till India itself was free' in one formulation, showing a principled rule that could lead to opposing recruitment resolutions when independence was unaddressed.
Check whether the Chelmsford conference addressed Indian self-rule; if it did not, this rule suggests Gandhi would likely oppose recruiting Indians.
- Directly records that 'The Congress was declared illegal' in the context of the Second Civil Disobedience Movement (1930).
- Places the ban in the same period when negotiations and political manoeuvres (Round Table Conference) were occurring, linking it to the 1930 unrest.
- Describes widespread breaking of the salt law, manufacture of salt and mass protests across the country.
- States the colonial government 'began arresting the Congress leaders one by one' as the movement spread, showing a direct repressive response to salt-related civil disobedience.
- Explains Gandhi's ultimatum and the Salt March that launched the Civil Disobedience Movement, establishing the Salt Satyagraha as the major nationwide challenge to British rule in 1930.
- Provides context for why the colonial state faced mass illegal acts (salt manufacture) that prompted strong administrative reactions.
- [THE VERDICT]: Elimination Sitter (via Statement 2). Source: Spectrum/Standard History (Chapter on WWI Response).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Evolution of Nationalist Strategy' towards British Wars (WWI vs. WWII).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the shift: WWI (Gandhi = 'Recruiting Sergeant', Tilak = Responsive Cooperation) vs. WWII (Congress = Conditional Support, Gandhi = Individual Satyagraha/Quit India). Also, link 'Indentured Labour' abolition (1917) to the specific agitation by Gandhi and C.F. Andrews.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not view historical figures as static caricatures. Map their timeline: Gandhi 1893-1914 (Moderate/Petitioner) -> 1915-1919 (Cooperator/Recruiter) -> 1920 onwards (Non-Cooperator). The exam targets the transition periods where their stance contradicts their general legacy.
Indentured labour replaced slavery after 1843 and was a five-year contractual system that transported hundreds of thousands of Indians to plantations overseas.
High-yield for colonial history questions: explains labour migration, colonial economic needs, and human costs of empire. Connects to themes of forced/contract labour, demographic shifts, and colonial legislation; useful for comparative questions on slavery vs. indenture and for essays on labour policies.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 17: Effects of British Rule > 17.9 Famines and Indentured labour > p. 274
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > Indentured labour > p. 4
- India and the Contemporary World โ II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: The Making of a Global World > 2.4 Indentured Labour Migration from India > p. 63
Gandhi intervened in peasant tenure and industrial labour disputes, representing a focus on internal rural and labour grievances within India.
Important for understanding the scope of Gandhian activism versus other colonial reforms: helps answer questions on methods of protest, limits of influence, and differences between domestic social reform and imperial labour policy. Links to studies of Non-cooperation, satyagraha, and labour rights.
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 2. The Making and Unmaking of Non-cooperation > p. 289
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > 2. The Making and Unmaking of Non-cooperation > p. 293
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > Charkha > p. 292
The formal end of slavery in India (1843) preceded and precipitated the rise of indentured recruitment as an alternate labour system for colonial plantations.
Clarifies continuity and change in colonial labour regimes; useful for answering questions on policy outcomes, causes of migration, and the moral/economic dimensions of colonial rule. Enables analysis of why abolition did not end coercive labour practices.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 17: Effects of British Rule > 17.9 Famines and Indentured labour > p. 274
- History , class XII (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 1: Rise of Nationalism in India > Indentured labour > p. 4
- India and the Contemporary World โ II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 3: The Making of a Global World > 2.4 Indentured Labour Migration from India > p. 63
Gandhi offered moral or conditional support to British war efforts but tied it to Indian political concessions rather than unconditional enlistment.
High-yield for questions on nationalist tactics: explains the nuance between collaboration and concession-seeking, links to Congress resignations and satyagraha strategies, and helps answer questions about why Indian leaders negotiated terms rather than simply supporting or opposing wars outright.
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART III, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 11: MAHATMA GANDHI AND THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT > Fig. 11.10 > p. 302
- Modern India ,Bipin Chandra, History class XII (NCERT 1982 ed.)[Old NCERT] > Chapter 15: Struggle for Swaraj > NATIONAL MOVEMENT DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR > p. 298
The Congress repeatedly insisted that Indian participation in the war required immediate responsible government or a promise of freedom after the war.
Vital for explaining the collective Congress stance in WWII-era negotiations: connects to constitutional demands, ministries' resignations, and how wartime diplomacy shaped independence negotiations; useful for questions on conditional support and political bargaining.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 22: Nationalist Response in the Wake of World War II > CWC Meeting at Wardha > p. 435
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 22: Nationalist Response in the Wake of World War II > Congress Offer to Viceroy > p. 434
At an earlier stage Gandhi had offered to encourage recruitment into British Indian forces, showing his position could vary by context and period.
Important for nuance: prevents oversimplification of Gandhi as uniformly anti-recruitment; aids answers comparing wartime positions across periods and leaders; helps tackle comparative and continuity-change questions.
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 15: Emergence of Gandhi > Satyagraha Against the Rowlatt Actโ First Mass Strike > p. 321
The Salt Satyagraha was the focal act of civil disobedience in 1930 that mobilised mass nonโcompliance with the salt law across India.
High-yield for modern India questions: it explains Gandhi's tactic of targeting a universal commodity, the scale of mobilisation, and the movement's role in forcing political confrontation with the Raj. Mastering this helps answer causation questions about colonial responses and subsequent negotiations like the Round Table Conference.
- India and the Contemporary World โ II. History-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 2: Nationalism in India > 3.1 The Salt March and the Civil Disobedience Movement > p. 39
- Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Civil Disobedience Movement > p. 810
The 'Defense of India Act, 1915'. It was the wartime emergency law that expired, leading to the Rowlatt Act (1919). The transition from 'War Support' to 'Rowlatt Satyagraha' is the pivot point of modern Indian history.
The 'Static vs. Dynamic' Hack. Statement 2 claims Gandhi 'did not support' recruitment. If you recall even vaguely that Gandhi tried to win British trust *before* Jallianwala Bagh (the 'Recruiting Sergeant' phase), S2 becomes False. If S2 is False, Options A, C, and D are eliminated instantly. You arrive at Option B without knowing anything about Indentured Labour or Salt Law.
Ethics (GS4): 'Means vs. Ends'. Gandhi's support for WWI recruitment was an ethical calculation (loyalty implies rights) that failed. This failure was the catalyst for his shift to Non-Cooperationโa perfect case study for ethical evolution in leadership.