Question map
In the context of polity, which one of the following would you accept as the most appropriate definition of liberty?
Explanation
The correct answer is option D because liberty means the absence of restraints on the activities of individuals, and at the same time, providing opportunities for the development of individual personalities[1]. This comprehensive definition goes beyond mere negative liberty (absence of constraints) to include the positive dimension of freedom. Freedom allows the full development of the individual's creativity, sensibilities and capabilities in various fields, and a free society is one that enables one to pursue one's interests with a minimum of constraints[2].
Option A is too narrow as it focuses only on protection from political tyranny. Option B represents only the negative aspect of liberty without the positive dimension of self-development. Option C is incorrect because liberty does not mean license to do what one likes, and has to be enjoyed within the limitations mentioned in the Constitution itself - the liberty conceived is not absolute but qualified[1]. Therefore, option D most appropriately captures the holistic understanding of liberty in political theory.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 5: Preamble of the Constitution > III Liberty > p. 45
- [2] Political Theory, Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: Freedom > p. 21
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Philosophy of Constitution' question, moving beyond mere articles to political theory. While Laxmikanth covers the Preamble, the specific conceptual distinction between Negative Liberty (Option B) and Positive Liberty (Option D) is a direct lift from NCERT Class XI Political Theory, Chapter 2.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the context of polity, is liberty appropriately defined as protection against the tyranny of political rulers?
- Statement 2: In the context of polity, is liberty appropriately defined as absence of restraint?
- Statement 3: In the context of polity, is liberty appropriately defined as the opportunity to do whatever one likes?
- Statement 4: In the context of polity, is liberty appropriately defined as the opportunity to develop oneself fully?
- Defines 'negative liberty' as absence of external constraints and an area where no external authority can interfere.
- Frames liberty specifically in terms of freedom from interference by authorities, matching the idea of protection from rulers.
- States that courts have the fullest power to protect the individual against executive tyranny in England.
- Links individual liberty directly to protection from executive (political ruler) overreach.
- Article 21 ensures personal liberty cannot be deprived except according to law, restricting arbitrary executive action.
- Specifies a constitutional safeguard that prevents members of the Executive from interfering with citizens' liberty without legal basis.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.