Question map
Which one of the following factors constitutes the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4: Separation of powers.
In a liberal democracy, the Separation of Powers (Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary) is the most fundamental safeguard for individual liberty. It ensures a system of checks and balances, preventing any single branch from exercising absolute authority or becoming tyrannical.
- Why Option 4 is correct: By distributing power, it limits the potential for the arbitrary exercise of authority. As Montesquieu argued, when legislative and executive powers are united, there can be no liberty.
- Why Option 1 is incorrect: A "committed" judiciary often implies commitment to the ruling party's ideology rather than the Constitution, which undermines judicial independence.
- Why Option 2 is incorrect: Centralization concentrates power at the top, which is the antithesis of liberty and leads to authoritarianism.
- Why Option 3 is incorrect: While an elected government represents the people, it can still result in a "tyranny of the majority" without structural restraints like the separation of powers.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'First Principles' question derived from Political Theory (NCERT Class XI). It tests conceptual clarity, not facts. The trap is Option A ('Committed' implies biased/subservient in Indian political history, not 'dedicated'). It rewards understanding the *function* of institutions (checking power) rather than just their existence.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does a committed judiciary constitute the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
- Statement 2: Does centralization of powers constitute the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
- Statement 3: Does an elected government constitute the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
- Statement 4: Does separation of powers constitute the best safeguard of liberty in a liberal democracy?
- Defines judicial independence as freedom from interference so judges can perform without fear or favour — a core condition for safeguarding liberty.
- Emphasises that other branches must not restrain judicial functioning, implying an independent judiciary can check arbitrary power.
- Notes that judiciary protects citizens' rights and that Public Interest Litigation has expanded its ability to protect rights.
- Links judicial practice (PILs) directly to increased powers in defending liberty and access to justice.
- Describes the judiciary as custodian of the Constitution, ensuring all branches operate within constitutional principles.
- Frames the judiciary’s role in checking other organs and resolving disputes as pivotal to maintaining democratic governance and rights.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.