Question map
With reference to the Legislative Assembly of a State in India, consider the following statements : 1. The Governor makes a customary address to Members of the House at the commencement of the first session of the year. 2. When a State Legislature does not have a rule on a particular matter, it follows the Lok Sabha rule on that matter. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is option C - both statements are correct.
Statement 1 is correct because the Governor can address the state legislature at the commencement of the first session after each general election and the first session of each year.[2] This is a constitutional provision that makes the Governor's address at the first session of each year a customary practice.
Statement 2 is also correct. Under Article 212(2) of the Constitution of India, state legislatures have the power to make rules for regulating their procedure and conduct of business. However, until rules are made under this article, the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in the Lok Sabha (with necessary modifications) apply to the state legislature. This means that when a state legislature does not have a specific rule on a particular matter, it follows the corresponding Lok Sabha rule on that matter as a default mechanism.
Therefore, both statements are accurate descriptions of constitutional provisions and practices, making option C the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewStatement 1 is a direct lift from standard Polity texts (Laxmikanth Ch. 30). Statement 2 is a 'Federal Trap'—it tests if you understand that State Legislatures are constitutionally autonomous, not subordinate branches of Parliament. Master the parallel between President/Parliament and Governor/State Legislature.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Governor of an Indian State address the State Legislative Assembly at the commencement of the first session of each year as a customary/constitutional practice?
- Statement 2: Under the Constitution of India or established practice, if a State Legislature has no rule on a particular matter, does it follow the Lok Sabha's rules on that matter?
- Explicitly lists the Governor's power to address the state legislature at the first session after each general election and the first session of each year.
- Presents this addressing as a formal legislative function of the Governor.
- Repeats the same provision about the Governor addressing the legislature at those specific occasions, reinforcing the point.
- Frames the address as part of the Governor's legislative powers and functions.
Notes that on most matters the Lok Sabha 'exercises supreme power' in Parliament, indicating a pattern where one House’s practices may be treated as authoritative in many ordinary legislative matters.
A student could compare this notion of Lok Sabha primacy with norms for State Legislatures to see whether central House practices are treated as default elsewhere.
Explains the division of legislative competence between Parliament and State Legislatures (Parliament can legislate for whole/any part of India), showing Parliament’s rules or legislation can have effect across states in some domains.
One could check whether Parliament’s procedural rules or central statutes are expressly applied to states when state rules are silent.
States that Parliament can legislate on a State List subject when Rajya Sabha passes a resolution in the national interest, showing a constitutional mechanism by which central norms can displace or supplement state law.
A student might investigate whether absence of state rules triggers use of such central mechanisms or if a specific constitutional provision governs procedural defaults.
Points out States may have unicameral or bicameral legislatures, implying procedural arrangements vary between states and are not uniform by default.
A student could use this to argue that variability makes an automatic application of Lok Sabha rules to all States less likely unless a constitutional/default rule exists.
Describes voting and procedural norms (majority, presiding officer's casting vote) within Houses, illustrating that Houses have their own internally defined procedures for decision-making.
A student could examine whether such procedural norms are house-specific and whether a gap in state rules is typically filled by analogous state house practice or by reference to Parliament's rules.
- [THE VERDICT]: Statement 1 is a SITTER (Laxmikanth, Governor chapter). Statement 2 is a LOGICAL TRAP (requires application of Federal principles).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The Constitutional provisions regarding 'Special Address' (Art 176) and 'Rules of Procedure' (Art 208).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Compare Art 87 (President) vs Art 176 (Governor). Memorize: The address happens at 1) First session after General Election, and 2) First session of each year. Note: If the House defeats the Motion of Thanks, the govt falls (if it's a no-confidence proxy). Check Art 208: If no rules exist, pre-Constitution provincial rules apply, NOT Lok Sabha rules.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about State Legislatures, always ask: 'Is this body independent or dependent?' The Constitution grants States procedural autonomy. Therefore, a default rule linking them to Lok Sabha is constitutionally unsound unless explicitly mentioned (which it isn't).
Defines the Governor's authority to summon, prorogue, dissolve the assembly and to address the legislature.
High-yield for UPSC because it clarifies the Governor's constitutional role in the legislative process and is often asked in questions on centre-state relations and executive-legislative interaction.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > Powers of the Governor. The Governor has no diplomatic or military powers like the President, but he possesses executive, legislative and judicial powers analogous to those of the President. > p. 272
Specifies the constitutional occasions when the head of the executive delivers an opening address to the legislature.
Important for distinguishing formal constitutional ceremonies and for drawing parallels between President's and Governor's roles; useful for prelims fact-based questions and mains analyses on constitutional practice.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > Legislative Powers > p. 316
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > b) The Opening Address. > p. 213
Establishes the Governor as a constituent of the state legislature, providing the basis for legislative functions like the opening address.
Core concept for questions on legislative structure (unicameral/bicameral), constitutional provisions about state bodies, and duties vested in the Governor; connects to broader topics on legislative procedures.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 33: State Legislature > ORGANISATION OF STATE LEGISLATURE > p. 334
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 33: State Legislature > ORGANISATION OF STATE LEGISLATURE > p. 334
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 14: The State Legislature > THE STATE LEGISLATURE > p. 281
Parliament is the national legislature while the State legislature is a separate, distinct body; this distinction is central to whether one body’s rules automatically apply to the other.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often test differences in institutional identity and powers; mastering this clarifies limits of applicability of parliamentary rules to state bodies and links to federal structure and legislative competence.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > WHY DO WE NEED TWO HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT? > p. 102
The Constitution allocates exclusive legislative subjects to Parliament and to State Legislatures, defining the separate spheres where each can make laws or rules.
Essential for answering questions about which body can legislate or set rules on particular matters; connects to Articles on legislative lists and to scenarios where Parliament may legislate for states, enabling candidates to reason about jurisdictional limits.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 24: DISTRIBUTION OF LEGISLATIVE AND EXECUTIVE POWERS > Territorial Extent of Union and State Legislation. > p. 376
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 14: Federal System > DB Parliament's Authority Over State List > p. 141
Lok Sabha exercises supremacy on most matters of national legislative decision-making and the Houses decide by majority voting rules that determine outcomes.
Useful for questions contrasting powers of the two Houses and for procedural issues; understanding majority rules and Lok Sabha’s practical predominance helps in reasoning about when Lok Sabha norms might influence national practice but not automatically bind state legislatures.
- Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 4: WORKING OF INSTITUTIONS > Two Houses of Parliament > p. 62
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Voting in House > p. 237
The actual default rule: Under Article 208(2), if a State Legislature hasn't made rules, the rules of procedure in force immediately before the commencement of the Constitution (i.e., Provincial Legislature rules) apply, modified by the Speaker.
Apply the 'Federal Autonomy Filter'. Statement 2 suggests State Legislatures are subordinate to Lok Sabha norms. In India's federal setup, States have independent legislative competence. Unless it's an emergency provision, automatic subordination to the Centre's rules is usually FALSE.
Mains GS-2 (Federalism & Governor's Role): The 'Customary Address' is not just ceremonial; it outlines the State Government's policy. Recent controversies (e.g., Tamil Nadu/Kerala) where Governors skipped paragraphs or walked out link this static fact to the 'Discretion vs. Aid and Advice' debate.