Question map
Consider the following statements : I. The Constitution of India explicitly mentions that in certain spheres the Governor of a State acts in his/her own discretion. II. The President of India can, of his/her own, reserve a bill passed by a State Legislature for his/her consideration without it being forwarded by the Governor of the State concerned. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
**Statement I is correct.** The Constitution authorizes the Governor to exercise some functions 'in his discretion'[1], and Article 163(1) explicitly states that the Council of Ministers shall advise the Governor "except in so far as he is by or under this Constitution required to exercise his functions or any of them in his discretion"[1]. This creates a clear constitutional distinction where certain spheres require the Governor to act in his/her own discretion.
**Statement II is incorrect.** The governor is empowered to reserve certain types of bills passed by the state legislature for the consideration of the President[2], and reservation of a State Bill for the assent of the President is a discretionary power of the Governor of a State, where the Governor may reserve the Bill for the consideration of the President[3]. The President cannot directly reserve a state bill on his/her own without it being forwarded by the Governor first. The constitutional mechanism requires the Governor's action as an intermediary.
Sources- [1] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 273
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 14: Federal System > IDI I Veto Over State Bills > p. 141
- [3] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > g) Assent to legislation and Veto. > p. 218
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Laxmikanth Sitter' that rewards precise reading of Article 163 (Discretion) and Article 200 (Reservation flow). If you missed this, your static revision of the President vs. Governor comparison table is weak. No current affairs required.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Constitution of India explicitly state that in certain spheres the Governor of a State acts in his or her own discretion?
- Statement 2: Under the Constitution of India, can the President reserve a bill passed by a State Legislature for the President's consideration without the bill first being forwarded by the Governor of the State?
- Directly contrasts President and Governor, stating the Constitution authorizes the Governor to exercise some functions in his discretion.
- Explicitly cites Article 163 language limiting the Council of Ministers' aid-and-advice duty 'except in so far as he is ... required to exercise ... in his discretion.'
- States the Governor must act with aid and advice of the council of ministers 'except in matters in which he/she is required to act in his/ her discretion.'
- Links the discretionary exception to specific constitutional articles (Articles 154, 163 and 164).
- Explains Article 163 provides for aid and advice 'except for the discretionary ones', confirming an express constitutional exception.
- Notes that where discretion is claimed the Governor's decision is final and has been treated as such by the judiciary.
- Explicitly states reservation of a state bill for the President is a discretionary power of the Governor.
- Describes the procedural step that a bill presented to the Governor may be reserved for the President instead of immediate assent or withholding.
- Implies reservation originates with the Governor after the bill is presented to him/her, not with the President.
- Explains that when a state bill is presented to the Governor he/she has the alternative to reserve the bill for the President's consideration.
- Frames reservation as one of the Governor's constitutional options under Article 200, indicating Governor-triggered referral.
- States the governor is empowered to reserve certain types of bills passed by the state legislature for the President's consideration.
- Notes the President's power to withhold assent to such reserved bills, reinforcing that reservation is effected by the Governor.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Directly solvable from Laxmikanth (Chapters: Governor, President) and D.D. Basu.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The Constitutional asymmetry between the President (bound by advice) and the Governor (explicit discretion), and the procedural flow of State Legislation.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize these Article 200/201 nuances: 1) Governor *must* reserve a bill if it endangers the position of the High Court. 2) Article 163(2): Governor's decision on whether a matter is discretionary is final and non-justiciable. 3) President has no time limit to decide on a reserved bill (Pocket Veto). 4) If President returns a bill and the State Legislature passes it again, the President is *not* bound to give assent (unlike the Governor).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not read powers in isolation. Always study the Governor's powers as a 'Delta' to the President's powers. For every executive action, ask: 'Who initiates this?' The President cannot unilaterally snatch a bill from a State; the Governor must send it up.
The Constitution carves out specific functions where the Governor may act in personal discretion rather than on ministerial advice.
High-yield for polity questions on executive powers and centre-state relations; helps answer questions about constitutional exceptions, reserve powers and judicial review of gubernatorial acts. Connects to topics on Articles 154β164, and to case-law on the scope of discretion.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 273
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
Article 163 establishes the Council of Ministers' advisory role while explicitly excepting functions the Governor must perform in his discretion.
Crucial for answering questions on the constitutional position of state executives and the limits of ministerial control; links to comparative study of President vs Governor and to practical issues like appointment powers and law-and-order provisions.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 273
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > NATURE OF ADVICE BY MINISTERS > p. 330
The Constitution does not empower the President to act in discretion but does empower the Governor to exercise certain discretionary functions.
Useful for comparative constitutional questions and for debates on federalism and state autonomy; enables candidates to explain why gubernatorial powers are distinct and where central oversight differs.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 273
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
Reservation of state bills for presidential consideration is a discretionary constitutional power exercised by the Governor.
High-yield for constitutional law and centreβstate relations questions; explains the procedural route by which state legislation reaches the President and clarifies executive checks at the state level. Helps answer questions on Article 200/201, federal balance, and the Governor's constitutional role.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > g) Assent to legislation and Veto. > p. 218
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Presidential Veto over State Legislation > p. 196
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 14: Federal System > IDI I Veto Over State Bills > p. 141
The President can give assent, withhold assent, or direct reconsideration when a state bill is reserved for the President.
Important for understanding the limits of state legislative autonomy and the Centre's overriding powers; useful in essays and MCQs on legislative vetoes, federal supremacy, and comparative federalism. Links to topics on assent/return powers and constitutional checks.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > Presidential Veto over State Legislation > p. 196
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Legislative Powers > p. 194
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 14: Federal System > IDI I Veto Over State Bills > p. 141
A state bill becomes law only after governor's assent or, if reserved, the President's decision under Articles 200 and 201.
Essential procedural knowledge for polity answers and case-based questions; connects to governor's options, presidential discretion, and when Centre intervention occurs. Enables precise answers on how state laws are validated and contested.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Presidential Veto over State Legislation > p. 196
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 18: President > Presidential Veto over State Legislation > p. 196
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 18: President > Legislative Powers > p. 194
The 'Mandatory Reservation' Trap: While general reservation is discretionary, the Governor is constitutionally *obligated* (2nd Proviso to Art 200) to reserve a bill if it derogates from the powers of the High Court. Expect a statement swapping 'discretionary' with 'mandatory' here.
The 'Federal Logic' Hack: In India's federal structure, the President acts as a check on State legislation only when 'invited' via the Governor. The President cannot *suo motu* (on his own) reach into a State Assembly and reserve a bill. That would destroy state autonomy. Statement II implies this impossible centralization, making it false.
Mains GS-2 (Federalism): This links directly to the debate on the 'Office of the Governor' being an agent of the Centre. The discretionary power to reserve bills is a frequent point of friction (e.g., Tamil Nadu/Kerala vs Governor cases) and is central to Sarkaria/Punchhi Commission recommendations.