In the context of Indian history, the Rakhmabai case of 1884 revolved around 1. women's right to gain education 2. age of consent 3. restitution of conjugal rights Select the correct answer using the code given below :

Quotes Begum Rokeya arguing that religion should not be used to withhold women's education, presenting a contemporaneous discourse linking women's rights and access to education.

A student could use this to infer that late‑19th/early‑20th social debates included claims about women's educational rights and therefore look for 1880s legal cases that engaged similar themes.

Describes reformers like Pandita Ramabai pressing for improved and professional education for women (e.g., medical education), showing organized campaigns for women's educational access in the period.

One could extend this pattern to hypothesize that legal disputes involving women then (such as Rakhmabai's) might touch on education or related social reforms, and so check case details.

Notes British-era neglect of women's education and that education was largely for the upper classes, providing background context for why legal/social challenges about women's education could arise in the 19th century.

A student could combine this structural background with knowledge of specific cases (like Rakhmabai) to assess whether such a case might involve educational access or social mobility issues.

Summarizes Mohini Jain (1992) as a legal case explicitly about the 'right to education', showing that courts have been arenas for adjudicating education rights.

Using this pattern, a student could reasonably search for whether earlier landmark cases (e.g., 19th‑century ones) similarly raised education issues, or contrast later jurisprudence with older cases like Rakhmabai.

Describes Unni Krishnan (1993) holding that right to education is connected to fundamental rights, illustrating a legal framework where private litigants can raise education claims.

A student might extend this rule to consider whether the Rakhmabai litigation could have been framed (or later interpreted) as involving educational entitlement or related personal rights.

Describes the Age of Consent Act (1891) as a legislative response to campaigns against child marriage and gives the specific reform (forbade marriage of girls below 12).

A student can note the 1891 law date and infer that disputes about child marriage/consent were active in the 1880s–1890s, so check whether an 1884 case fits this legislative/reform timeline.

Mentions the Age of Consent Bill debate (raising marriageable age for girls from 10 to 12) and political opposition in the same historical period.

Use the described Bill and political controversy to deduce that legal cases in the 1880s could be linked to age/marriage issues and compare the 1884 case facts to that controversy.

Connects reformers (Malabari, Malabari’s campaigning) and social work (Seva Sadan) with efforts that led to the Age of Consent Act regulating the age of consent for females.

Recognize that prominent social/legal challenges to child marriage were driving law changes, so an 1884 legal dispute involving a young bride might plausibly relate to age-of-consent concerns and deserves checking against Rakhmabai case details.

Lists the Age of Consent Act, 1891 among a sequence of late-19th/early-20th reforms addressing marriage and women's status.

Place the Rakhmabai case chronologically before the 1891 Act and ask whether it could have been one of the antecedent legal incidents that highlighted the need for such reform.

Discusses 'restitution' as a legal remedy (e.g., State liable for restitution of unlawfully made profits), showing restitution is an established legal concept used in courts.

A student could infer that 'restitution' as a legal remedy might also be invoked in private law disputes (including family/marital cases) and thus check whether the Rakhmabai case used that remedy.

Uses the term 'restitution' in statute (Forest Rights Act) showing the term's usage across different branches of law and contexts.

One could extend this pattern to suspect that historical case law dealing with personal rights might also employ 'restitution' terminology and so search case texts for that term.

Describes 19th-century legal and social reforms concerning women's marital status (e.g., widow remarriage, efforts by reformers), indicating that courts and legislatures engaged with marriage-related legal issues in that era.

A student could reasonably look among 19th-century marriage-related cases (like Rakhmabai) for legal doctrines such as conjugal rights or remedies affecting wives.

Notes active movements and legislation around women's marital rights in the 19th century, showing public and legal attention to marital customs and legal regulation of marriage.

Combine this historical context with a search for notable 1880s family law cases to see whether restitution of conjugal rights featured in such disputes.

Mentions women contesting husbands' neglect and the state's intervention to ensure family provision, highlighting that courts/panchayats handled disputes about marital obligations.

A student could infer that legal actions concerning marital obligations (possibly including conjugal rights) were within the remit of dispute resolution bodies and thus investigate Rakhmabai records for such claims.