In the context of Indian history, the Rakhmabai case of 1884 revolved around 1. women's right to gain education 2. age of consent 3. restitution of conjugal rights Select the correct answer using the code given below :

Quotes Begum Rokeya arguing that religion should not be used to withhold women's education, presenting a contemporaneous discourse linking women's rights and access to education.

A student could use this to infer that late‑19th/early‑20th social debates included claims about women's educational rights and therefore look for 1880s legal cases that engaged similar themes.

Describes reformers like Pandita Ramabai pressing for improved and professional education for women (e.g., medical education), showing organized campaigns for women's educational access in the period.

One could extend this pattern to hypothesize that legal disputes involving women then (such as Rakhmabai's) might touch on education or related social reforms, and so check case details.

Notes British-era neglect of women's education and that education was largely for the upper classes, providing background context for why legal/social challenges about women's education could arise in the 19th century.

A student could combine this structural background with knowledge of specific cases (like Rakhmabai) to assess whether such a case might involve educational access or social mobility issues.

Summarizes Mohini Jain (1992) as a legal case explicitly about the 'right to education', showing that courts have been arenas for adjudicating education rights.

Using this pattern, a student could reasonably search for whether earlier landmark cases (e.g., 19th‑century ones) similarly raised education issues, or contrast later jurisprudence with older cases like Rakhmabai.

Describes Unni Krishnan (1993) holding that right to education is connected to fundamental rights, illustrating a legal framework where private litigants can raise education claims.

A student might extend this rule to consider whether the Rakhmabai litigation could have been framed (or later interpreted) as involving educational entitlement or related personal rights.