Question map
Consider the following statements : Other things remaining unchanged, market demand for a good might increase if 1. price of its substitute increases 2. price of its complement increases 3. the good is an inferior good and income of the consumers increases 4. its price falls Which of the above statements are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 and 4 only). Market demand for a good increases due to the following reasons mentioned in the statements:
- Statement 1 is correct: Substitutes are goods used in place of each other. If the price of a substitute (e.g., coffee) increases, consumers switch to the original good (e.g., tea), thereby increasing its market demand.
- Statement 4 is correct: According to the Law of Demand, an inverse relationship exists between price and quantity demanded. Other things being equal, a fall in the price of a good leads to an increase in its demand.
Why other statements are incorrect:
- Statement 2 is incorrect: Complements are used together (e.g., cars and petrol). If the price of a complement increases, the demand for the original good decreases.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: For inferior goods, demand decreases as consumer income increases, as consumers shift toward superior or normal goods.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewA classic NCERT-based conceptual question. It tests the definitions of Substitutes, Complements, and Inferior goods. While Statement 4 technically describes a 'movement' rather than a 'shift', the blatant incorrectness of Statements 2 and 3 allows you to solve this purely via elimination.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does an increase in the price of a substitute good, ceteris paribus, increase the market demand (shift the demand curve) for the original good?
- Statement 2: Does an increase in the price of a complement good, ceteris paribus, increase the market demand (shift the demand curve) for the original good?
- Statement 3: For an inferior good, does an increase in consumers' income, ceteris paribus, increase the market demand (shift the demand curve) for that good?
- Statement 4: Does a fall in a good's own price, ceteris paribus, increase the market demand (shift the demand curve) for that good rather than only increasing quantity demanded along the demand curve?
- Directly asserts that an increase in the price of a substitute good causes the demand curve to shift rightward.
- Provides the directional effect (rightward shift) under ceteris paribus conditions.
- Contrasts substitute effect with complementary goods to clarify sign of the shift.
- States that the demand depends on prices of other goods and that changes in those prices lead to shifts in the demand curve.
- Distinguishes shifts in the demand curve (caused by other factors) from movements along the curve (caused by own-price changes).
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.