Question map
Consider the following statements: 1. The Global Ocean Commission grants licences for seabed exploration and mining in international waters. 2. India has received licences for seabed mineral exploration in international waters. 3. ‘Rare earth minerals’ are present on seafloor in international waters. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (2 and 3 only) based on the following analysis:
- Statement 1 is incorrect: The International Seabed Authority (ISA), established under UNCLOS, is the body authorized to grant licenses for seabed exploration and mining in international waters. The Global Ocean Commission was an international initiative (2013-2016) focused on ocean health and governance, but it had no regulatory or licensing powers.
- Statement 2 is correct: India was the first "pioneer investor" to be allotted a site in the Central Indian Ocean Basin. The ISA has granted India licenses for exploring Polymetallic Nodules and Polymetallic Sulphides in international waters.
- Statement 3 is correct: Sea-floor deposits, including polymetallic nodules and cobalt-rich crusts, are known to contain significant concentrations of rare earth minerals, copper, nickel, and manganese, making deep-sea mining a strategic interest.
Since statement 1 is false and statements 2 and 3 are true, Option 2 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Authority Swap' trap. UPSC replaced the 'International Seabed Authority' (the actual UNCLOS body) with the 'Global Ocean Commission' (a temporary advisory initiative). If you knew the basic regulator of the high seas, this was an easy elimination question.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Global Ocean Commission grant licences for seabed exploration and mining in international waters?
- Statement 2: Has India received licences for seabed mineral exploration in international waters?
- Statement 3: Are rare earth minerals present on the seafloor in international waters?
- Identifies the International Seabed Authority (ISA) as the central global institution responsible for regulating mineral-related activities in the seabed beyond national jurisdictions.
- Says ISA is the legal and administrative body charged with ensuring mineral resources in the Area are developed for the benefit of all humankind — implying ISA, not the Global Ocean Commission, holds regulatory authority.
- States that seabed activities are under the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
- Describes ISA's duty to enforce environmental and safety regulations and to ensure developing nations benefit from mining in international waters, indicating ISA's licensing/regulatory role.
- Shows the Global Ocean Commission (GOC) produces policy papers on strengthening deep seabed mining regulation, indicating a policy/advisory role.
- Implies GOC's role is to propose regulatory options rather than to act as a licensing authority.
Shows that specialised international bodies exist to undertake ocean work (example: International Council for Exploration of the Sea) rather than individual countries acting alone.
A student could check whether the Global Ocean Commission is described as a regulatory body with licensing powers like such international organisations, or if it is advisory/research-focused instead.
States that lands, minerals and other things under waters within territorial waters, continental shelf and EEZ vest in the coastal state, implying a legal distinction between national zones and areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Using this rule and a basic map of maritime zones, a student could identify that licensing for seabed mining in 'international waters' (beyond EEZ/continental shelf) likely falls to a different, specific international mechanism and so check which organisation holds that mandate.
Describes exploitation of mineral wealth from continental shelves by littoral (coastal) countries, indicating that coastal states commonly grant licences for offshore resource extraction within their jurisdiction.
A student could infer that licence-granting for seabed mining is typically a coastal-state function within EEZ/continental shelf and would therefore look for a separate authority for areas beyond these zones to assess the Global Ocean Commission's role.
Discusses national mineral policy reforms and the granting of licences to private sector actors, showing that mining licences are often national policy instruments.
From this pattern, a student could ask whether the Global Ocean Commission issues licences (a national-type function) or instead influences policy—then check the commission's legal/operational remit.
Explains that licences and permissions for sand mining are administered by local/national authorities and subject to environmental clearances, reinforcing that mining licences are typically granted by domestic bodies.
A student could generalise that since resource licences are usually national, they should verify whether any international body explicitly has licensing authority for seabed mining beyond national zones, and whether that is the Global Ocean Commission.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.