Question map
Consider the following statements: 1. The Global Ocean Commission grants licences for seabed exploration and mining in international waters. 2. India has received licences for seabed mineral exploration in international waters. 3. ‘Rare earth minerals’ are present on seafloor in international waters. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (2 and 3 only) based on the following analysis:
- Statement 1 is incorrect: The International Seabed Authority (ISA), established under UNCLOS, is the body authorized to grant licenses for seabed exploration and mining in international waters. The Global Ocean Commission was an international initiative (2013-2016) focused on ocean health and governance, but it had no regulatory or licensing powers.
- Statement 2 is correct: India was the first "pioneer investor" to be allotted a site in the Central Indian Ocean Basin. The ISA has granted India licenses for exploring Polymetallic Nodules and Polymetallic Sulphides in international waters.
- Statement 3 is correct: Sea-floor deposits, including polymetallic nodules and cobalt-rich crusts, are known to contain significant concentrations of rare earth minerals, copper, nickel, and manganese, making deep-sea mining a strategic interest.
Since statement 1 is false and statements 2 and 3 are true, Option 2 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Authority Swap' trap. UPSC replaced the 'International Seabed Authority' (the actual UNCLOS body) with the 'Global Ocean Commission' (a temporary advisory initiative). If you knew the basic regulator of the high seas, this was an easy elimination question.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does the Global Ocean Commission grant licences for seabed exploration and mining in international waters?
- Statement 2: Has India received licences for seabed mineral exploration in international waters?
- Statement 3: Are rare earth minerals present on the seafloor in international waters?
- Identifies the International Seabed Authority (ISA) as the central global institution responsible for regulating mineral-related activities in the seabed beyond national jurisdictions.
- Says ISA is the legal and administrative body charged with ensuring mineral resources in the Area are developed for the benefit of all humankind — implying ISA, not the Global Ocean Commission, holds regulatory authority.
- States that seabed activities are under the jurisdiction of the International Seabed Authority (ISA).
- Describes ISA's duty to enforce environmental and safety regulations and to ensure developing nations benefit from mining in international waters, indicating ISA's licensing/regulatory role.
- Shows the Global Ocean Commission (GOC) produces policy papers on strengthening deep seabed mining regulation, indicating a policy/advisory role.
- Implies GOC's role is to propose regulatory options rather than to act as a licensing authority.
Shows that specialised international bodies exist to undertake ocean work (example: International Council for Exploration of the Sea) rather than individual countries acting alone.
A student could check whether the Global Ocean Commission is described as a regulatory body with licensing powers like such international organisations, or if it is advisory/research-focused instead.
States that lands, minerals and other things under waters within territorial waters, continental shelf and EEZ vest in the coastal state, implying a legal distinction between national zones and areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Using this rule and a basic map of maritime zones, a student could identify that licensing for seabed mining in 'international waters' (beyond EEZ/continental shelf) likely falls to a different, specific international mechanism and so check which organisation holds that mandate.
Describes exploitation of mineral wealth from continental shelves by littoral (coastal) countries, indicating that coastal states commonly grant licences for offshore resource extraction within their jurisdiction.
A student could infer that licence-granting for seabed mining is typically a coastal-state function within EEZ/continental shelf and would therefore look for a separate authority for areas beyond these zones to assess the Global Ocean Commission's role.
Discusses national mineral policy reforms and the granting of licences to private sector actors, showing that mining licences are often national policy instruments.
From this pattern, a student could ask whether the Global Ocean Commission issues licences (a national-type function) or instead influences policy—then check the commission's legal/operational remit.
Explains that licences and permissions for sand mining are administered by local/national authorities and subject to environmental clearances, reinforcing that mining licences are typically granted by domestic bodies.
A student could generalise that since resource licences are usually national, they should verify whether any international body explicitly has licensing authority for seabed mining beyond national zones, and whether that is the Global Ocean Commission.
Defines India's maritime zones (territorial waters 12 nm; EEZ up to 200 nm) and states that sea-wealth within territorial waters, continental shelf and EEZ vests in the Union.
A student could use this to distinguish Indian jurisdiction (EEZ/continental shelf) from international waters (beyond 200 nm) and then check whether any licences mentioned refer to areas beyond 200 nm.
Explains that the Central Government frames rules for mineral development and is owner of minerals underlying the ocean within territorial waters or the EEZ.
Use this to infer that licences for seabed minerals inside EEZ would be granted by India, so any claimed 'international waters' licences would not fall under this domestic regime and need separate confirmation.
States the Indian Ocean continental shelf and seabed contain high-grade nodules (at ~4000 m) of manganese, titanium, etc., indicating presence of exploitable seabed minerals potentially of interest for exploration.
Combine with a map showing locations of these deposits vs. the 200 nm limit to assess whether identified deposits lie inside India's jurisdiction or in international waters where different licensing applies.
Describes India's practice of issuing licences/policies for hydrocarbon exploration (NELP/HELP), showing an established precedent of the government licensing resource exploration.
A student might generalize that India has institutional mechanisms to grant exploration licences domestically, so claims about licences in international waters would likely involve international bodies or separate agreements rather than only domestic policy.
- Specifically names polymetallic nodules on the deep seafloor as containing rare earth elements.
- Identifies the Clarion–Clipperton Zone (CCZ) — a region in international waters — as a major area where these nodules occur.
- Confirms that polymetallic nodules (PMN) and cobalt-rich ferromanganese crusts (CFCs) are enriched in rare earth elements.
- Specifically lists light rare earth elements (lanthanum, cerium, neodymium) present in these seafloor mineral types.
States that the ocean beds are rich in manganese nodules and that ocean waters contain vast quantities of minerals (though often widely diffused).
A student could take this as evidence that the seafloor can host concentrated mineral deposits and then look up whether rare earth elements (REEs) are known to occur in nodules or seabed deposits.
Explains seafloor spreading at mid-ocean ridges where new oceanic crust forms from upwelling basaltic magma.
One can infer that geological activity at ridges and spreading centers may create environments (e.g., hydrothermal systems) that concentrate metals, so check whether REEs are associated with such settings.
Notes higher temperatures near mid-ocean ridges due to upwelling magmatic material and links ridges to volcanic/tectonic activity.
Use this to justify investigating hydrothermal vent deposits and their metal content (potential hosts for REEs) on the seafloor in international areas.
States many minerals formed deep within the Earth are brought to the surface by volcanic activity.
Apply the rule that deep-sourced minerals can be brought to ocean floors by volcanism and then check whether rare earth-bearing minerals are among those mobilized and deposited in marine settings.
Says almost every known chemical element occurs in the oceans in varying proportions, though many are in trace quantities.
Combine this with the existence of concentrated seabed deposits to ask whether REEs, present in seawater or sediments in trace amounts, could accumulate into economically significant deposits on the seafloor.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap (Statement 1). While Statements 2 and 3 are standard Current Affairs/Science, Statement 1 is a specific distractor designed to catch those who don't know the ISA.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: UNCLOS (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea) and the governance of 'The Area' (seabed beyond national jurisdiction).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize: ISA (International Seabed Authority) HQ in Kingston, Jamaica; ITLOS (Hamburg); India's 2 contracts (Polymetallic Nodules in Central Indian Ocean Basin & Polymetallic Sulphides in Indian Ocean Ridge); Clarion-Clipperton Zone (Pacific).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading about 'Deep Ocean Mission' or 'Blue Economy', always ask: Who is the global regulator? Does India have specific rights outside its EEZ? The legal framework is as important as the resource itself.
Territorial waters, the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone define which state holds rights to seabed minerals and can grant licences.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often probe legal control over marine resources and maritime boundaries; links to geopolitics, natural resource policy and international law; enables answers on who can legally authorize seabed extraction in different maritime zones.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 75: Rights and Liabilities of the Government > I Sea-Wealth > p. 551
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > 3. Minerals > p. 67
International oceanographic organisations focus on research and data collection, while licensing of seabed resources is a function tied to jurisdictional rights of states.
Important for distinguishing mandates in questions about ocean governance and institutional roles; helps evaluate claims about which bodies can lawfully grant licences and clarifies international cooperation vs regulatory authority.
- Certificate Physical and Human Geography , GC Leong (Oxford University press 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: The Oceans > Exploring the Oceans > p. 104
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 75: Rights and Liabilities of the Government > I Sea-Wealth > p. 551
Deep-ocean drilling and seabed sampling require specialised vessels, high cost and large-scale projects, influencing who conducts exploration and how it is organised.
Useful for answering questions on feasibility, actors and modes of seabed exploration; connects to policy on public vs private roles, international projects and resource access; aids in assessing practical constraints on licensing and exploitation.
- FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, Geography Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 2: The Origin and Evolution of the Earth > Direct Sources > p. 18
- Certificate Physical and Human Geography , GC Leong (Oxford University press 3rd ed.) > Chapter 12: The Oceans > Exploring the Oceans > p. 104
Defines India's territorial waters, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone and asserts that minerals under these waters vest in the Union.
High-yield for questions on maritime jurisdiction, sovereign rights over marine resources and links to international maritime law; helps answer policy and legal questions about who controls seabed resources and how they are managed.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 75: Rights and Liabilities of the Government > I Sea-Wealth > p. 551
Identifies that the continental shelf of the Indian Ocean contains high-grade nodules at depths (~4000 m) composed of manganese, titanium, iron, monazite and other metals.
Important for questions on marine mineral resources, their economic and strategic value, and environmental implications; connects to resource economics, technological challenges of deep-sea mining and geopolitical competition for critical minerals.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 7: Resources > Mineral Belts of India > p. 3
Explains that regulation of mines is on the Union List, states own minerals within their territory while the Central Government owns minerals underlying the ocean within territorial waters or the EEZ.
Crucial for questions on federalism, resource governance, and mining policy; links to constitutional distribution of subjects, mining legislation, and central control of strategic minerals and offshore resources.
- Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 14: Infrastructure and Investment Models > 14.11 Coal, Coal Mines Act 2015 and MMDR Act 2015 > p. 427
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 75: Rights and Liabilities of the Government > I Sea-Wealth > p. 551
Manganese nodules are identified as abundant on the ocean bed and are a key form in which seabed minerals occur.
High‑yield for questions on marine mineral resources, economic geology and seabed mining policy. Links resource geography with international maritime law and national resource strategies; enables answers about types of seabed deposits and their economic potential.
- NCERT. (2022). Contemporary India II: Textbook in Geography for Class X (Revised ed.). NCERT. > Chapter 5: Print Culture and the Modern World > MODE OF OCCURRENCE OF MINERALS > p. 107
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 16: India–Political Aspects > 4. Other Minerals > p. 67
India is the first country to have the status of a 'Pioneer Investor' (1987). The next logical question is about the specific metals in Polymetallic Nodules (Manganese, Iron, Nickel, Copper, Cobalt) vs Polymetallic Sulphides (Copper, Zinc, Gold, Silver).
Name Heuristic: Regulatory bodies with binding powers are usually called 'Authority', 'Agency', or 'Organization' (e.g., International Seabed Authority). 'Commissions' are often advisory or temporary high-level panels. If you knew ISA regulates the seabed, Statement 1 is false. Eliminating 1 removes options A, C, and D. Answer B is derived instantly.
Connects Geography (Ocean Resources) to IR (UNCLOS/Strategic Autonomy) and Economy (Critical Minerals for EV batteries). In Mains, cite this as India's strategic push to reduce dependence on China for Rare Earths.