Question map
With reference to Chausath Yogini Temple situated near Morena, consider the following statements : 1. It is a circular temple built during the reign of Kachchhapaghata Dynasty. 2. It is the only circular temple built in India. 3. It was meant to promote the Vaishnava cult in the region. 4. Its design has given rise to a popular belief that it was the inspiration behind the Indian Parliament building. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 3 (1 and 4). Below is the comprehensive explanation:
- Statement 1 is correct: The Chausath Yogini Temple at Mitawali (Morena) was built in the 11th century by King Devapala of the Kachchhapaghata Dynasty. It is renowned for its distinct circular plan.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: It is not the only circular temple in India. Other examples include the Chausath Yogini temples at Hirapur and Ranipur Jharial (Odisha), as well as the circular Shiva temple at Masrur.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: As the name "Yogini" suggests, the temple was dedicated to the Shakti/Tantric cult, specifically the 64 yoginis, rather than the Vaishnava cult. The central shrine is dedicated to Lord Shiva.
- Statement 4 is correct: Its unique hypaethral (open-to-sky) circular design with an external colonnade has led to the popular belief that it served as the architectural inspiration for the old Indian Parliament House (Sansad Bhavan) designed by Edwin Lutyens and Herbert Baker.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Current Affairs disguised as Art & Culture' question. The trigger was the 2020-21 Central Vista Project debates, where viral images compared the old Parliament to this temple. While standard books miss the specific dynasty, the 'Parliament inspiration' angle was all over the news.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Was the Chausath Yogini Temple near Morena built as a circular temple during the reign of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty?
- Statement 2: Is the Chausath Yogini Temple near Morena the only circular temple built in India?
- Statement 3: Was the Chausath Yogini Temple near Morena intended to promote the Vaishnava cult in the region?
- Statement 4: Has the design of the Chausath Yogini Temple near Morena been cited as the inspiration for the design of the Indian Parliament building?
- Explicitly states the temple's unique circular architecture.
- Directly says it was constructed during the reign of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty.
- Describes the temple as a 'circular marvel'.
- Links that circular design to the patronage of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty.
- Labels the site a 'Mystical Circular Sanctuary', indicating its circular form.
- States it was constructed during the Kachchhapaghata dynasty (gives specific dates 1055–1075 CE).
Gives a clear example where a temple (a Durga temple at Aihole) was built on the model of a Buddhist chaitya and stands on a raised platform in the form of a semi-circle, showing circular/curvilinear temple plans existed.
A student could use this example plus a regional map/dates to ask whether the circular form appears in central India and whether Kachchhapaghata-era sites show similar plans.
States the general early-temple pattern: the early temple was a small square garbhagriha, indicating that non-square plans were exceptions rather than the rule.
A student could use this rule to treat a circular plan as an architectural exception and therefore seek specific inscriptions or archaeological reports tying that exception to the Kachchhapaghatas.
Describes features of early and later temple forms (shikhara over central shrine, carved walls, cave/chaitya traditions), suggesting continuity from rock-cut/chaitya forms to later plans.
A student might connect chaitya-derived curved plans to a circular Chausath Yogini design and then check whether such chaitya-derived forms occur in Morena/Kachchhapaghata contexts.
Notes that regional dynasties (e.g., Chandelas) built major temple complexes, implying that identifying the patron dynasty for a temple requires matching regional dynastic activity and temple typology.
A student could compare the geographic and chronological range of the Kachchhapaghata dynasty with known dynastic temple-building patterns to judge the plausibility of their patronage of the Morena temple.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.