With reference to Madanapalle of Andhra Pradesh, which one of the following statements is correct?

States Pattabhi Sitaramayya (Sitaramaiah) was a recognised Congress leader who led the Non-Cooperation Movement in the Andhra delta region, showing he was active as a regional leader in Andhra.

A student could infer that because he led major regional campaigns earlier, it is plausible he might have been involved in other mass movements (like Quit India) in Andhra and should check Quit India-era accounts for his role and base.

Notes Pattabhi Sitaramayya's prominence at national level (election as Congress President and membership of the JVP committee), indicating national-level engagement and influence.

Given national stature, a student could extend this to ask whether his national duties during 1942 affected local leadership roles and thus look for dates/locations to confirm or refute leadership from Madanapalle.

Describes the Quit India Movement as a mass movement with many regional leaders and named local leaders in various provinces, illustrating that regional leadership often mattered and was documented.

Use this pattern to guide a search for named Andhra leaders during Quit India (e.g., local newspapers, lists of arrested leaders) to see if Pattabhi or Madanapalle is mentioned.

Gives examples of local Andhra activists (Duggirala Balaramakrishnaya) leading regional campaigns and cultural mobilisation, showing Andhra had distinct local leaders active in various Gandhian campaigns.

A student could compare lists of Andhra leaders across different movements to see whether Pattabhi appears in Quit India-specific lists or whether other local leaders were the primary organisers.

Documents strong political mobilisation in Telugu-speaking areas and widespread regional protests, confirming that Andhra was a politically active theatre where local leadership roles for major movements were likely.

Combine this with a timeline of Pattabhi's activities to check if he was present in Madanapalle or engaged in Andhra Quit India leadership during 1942.

Shows Tagore composed prominent patriotic songs (e.g., 'Amar Sonar Bangla') that became national anthems for another country, indicating he did produce anthem-related translations or versions in his oeuvre.

A student could check lists of Tagore's multilingual publications or biography timelines to see where and when he produced English versions of his songs.

States Tagore composed a national song that was sung widely in Bengal during the 1905 protests, indicating his anthem-related activity was centered in Bengal during that period.

Combine this with biographical timelines (locations where Tagore lived/worked) to test whether he was in Madanapalle at the time he might have translated the anthem.

Identifies Tagore as the central literary figure of Bengali language and culture, implying his primary work and activities were tied to Bengal.

Use basic geography/biography to compare Tagore's Bengal-centered life with Madanapalle (Andhra) to assess plausibility of him doing a translation there.

Gives a language-region pattern: Bengali's cultural core is West Bengal and its periphery excludes Andhra Pradesh (whose core language is Telugu).

A student could use this to argue it's less likely a major Bengali-language literary act (like translating a Bengali anthem) would occur in a Telugu-majority town unless there is specific evidence of Tagore's presence there.

Describes Tagore's efforts collecting Bengali folk traditions to build national identity, indicating his translations/English versions might be connected to his cultural work rather than distant regional locales.

Cross-reference Tagore's cultural projects and travel record to see whether translating the anthem in Madanapalle fits his documented activities.

States the Society was founded in New York (1875) and that in 1882 they shifted their headquarters to Adyar on the outskirts of Madras.

A student could use the dates and locations given (New York → Adyar, 1882) and compare them with Madanapalle's geography and any local timelines to see if Madanapalle plausibly hosted an earlier headquarters.

Explicitly says Blavatsky and Olcott later came to India and founded the Society's headquarters at Adyar near Madras (given year 1886 here).

A student could reconcile the years (1882 vs 1886) and check historical chronologies and maps to determine whether any interim headquarters in Madanapalle are consistent with these reported dates and the move to Adyar.

Notes they came to India in 1879 and established their headquarters at 'Advar' in 1882, reinforcing the Adyar location and an early-1880s move.

Using the arrival year (1879) and HQ-established year (1882), a student could look for records of the Society's activities between those years to test whether Madanapalle appears as a temporary HQ.

Records a 1884 meeting of the Theosophical Society in Madras where the idea of forming the Indian National Congress was discussed — showing the Society's presence and activity in Madras/Adyar region in the 1880s.

A student could map centers of Theosophical activity (Madras/Adyar) against Madanapalle to judge whether Madanapalle was likely to have been a primary headquarters at that time.

Describes Colonel Olcott's influence in the Tamil country in the 1890s, indicating sustained Theosophical activity centered in the Madras/Tamil region rather than Andhra towns.

A student could use regional influence patterns (Tamil country focus) to assess the probability that the Society's HQ was based in nearby Adyar rather than in Madanapalle, Andhra Pradesh.