Question map
A legislation which confers on the executive or administrative authority an unguided and uncontrolled discretionary power in the matter of application of law violates which one of the following Articles of the Constitution of India?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (Article 14).
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution guarantees Equality before Law and Equal Protection of Laws. The Supreme Court has consistently held that the "Rule of Law" is a basic feature of the Constitution. If a law confers "unguided and uncontrolled" discretionary power on the executive, it creates room for discrimination and arbitrariness.
- Arbitrariness vs. Equality: In the landmark E.P. Royappa case, the Judiciary established that "Equality is antithetical to arbitrariness." Any law that allows an authority to act according to personal whims without defined guidelines violates the guarantee of non-arbitrariness under Article 14.
- Article 28: Relates to religious instruction in educational institutions; it is irrelevant to administrative discretion.
- Article 32: Provides the right to constitutional remedies; it is the mechanism for enforcement, not the substantive right being violated here.
- Article 44: A Directive Principle (UCC) which is non-justiciable.
Thus, unguided discretion is struck down as "manifestly arbitrary," directly violating the mandate of Article 14.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Spirit of the Constitution' question. It moves beyond the text of Article 14 to its jurisprudential core: the Rule of Law. If you only memorized 'Equality before Law' without understanding that 'Arbitrariness is the sworn enemy of Equality' (E.P. Royappa case logic), you would miss this.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Discusses Article 14 as guaranteeing absence of arbitrary discrimination both in laws and in their administration.
- Explicitly links arbitrariness in administrative orders to a violation of Article 14.
- Directly ties arbitrary or uncontrolled discretion by authorities to breach of equality protection under Article 14.
- Explains constitutional limits on arbitrary executive action (example: taxation) and right to remedy in courts.
- Illustrates that the Constitution prevents executive arbitrariness, supporting the view that unguided discretion is unconstitutional.
- States that the Supreme Court and High Courts can declare invalid any law or executive action if it is against the Constitution.
- Provides the remedial mechanism by which arbitrary administrative discretion (violative of constitutional rights) can be checked.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.