Question map
Which of the following are the discretionary powers given to the Governor of a State? 1. Sending a report to the President of India for imposing the President's rule 2. Appointing the Ministers 3. Reserving certain bills passed by the State Legislature for consideration of the President of India 4. Making the rules to conduct the business of the State Government Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The Governor has constitutional discretion in recommending the imposition of the President's Rule in the state[1], and reserving a bill for the consideration of the President[1]. These are expressly mentioned discretionary powers.
However, appointing Ministers is not a discretionary power of the Governor. The Council of Ministers with the Chief Minister as head aids and advises the Governor in exercise of his functions except in so far as he is required to exercise his functions in his discretion[2]. The Governor appoints the Chief Minister and Ministers on the advice of the Chief Minister, not at his own discretion.
Similarly, while the Governor makes rules for the more convenient transaction of the business of the Government of the State and for the allocation among Ministers, this is done in so far as it is not business with respect to which the Governor is required to act in his discretion[3]. This means making rules for conducting state government business is generally done on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, not as a discretionary power.
Therefore, only statements 1 and 3 are correct discretionary powers, making option B the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
- [2] https://knowindia.india.gov.in/profile/the-states.php
- [3] https://governor.telangana.gov.in/roleofgovernor.do
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a textbook 'Static Polity' question directly solvable from Laxmikanth (Chapter: Governor). It tests the fundamental distinction between 'Constitutional Discretion' (explicitly mentioned in Articles) and routine executive functions performed on 'Aid and Advice'. If you know the specific list of discretionary powers, this is a sitter.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is sending a report to the President recommending imposition of President's Rule in a state a discretionary power of the Governor of a State in India?
- Statement 2: Is appointing the State Ministers a discretionary power of the Governor of a State in India?
- Statement 3: Is reserving certain bills passed by the State Legislature for the consideration of the President of India a discretionary power of the Governor of a State?
- Statement 4: Is making rules to conduct the business of the State Government a discretionary power of the Governor of a State in India?
- Explicitly lists ‘Recommendation for the imposition of the President's Rule in the state’ as an instance of the governor's constitutional discretion.
- Uses the term ‘constitutional discretion’, indicating this is a recognised discretionary power under the Constitution.
- States the governor ‘can recommend the imposition of constitutional emergency in a state to the President’, directly affirming the recommending power.
- Links this recommending power to the governor’s executive role during President's Rule, showing practical effect.
- Explains the governor ‘has the power to make a report to the President whenever he is satisfied that a situation has arisen’ under Article 356, i.e., to invite President's Rule.
- Connects the report-making to Article 356 language, demonstrating the constitutional basis for the governor's discretion to report.
- Explicitly lists "appointing the Council of Ministers" as a function of the Governor.
- Immediately contrasts that with "functions... to be exercised by the Governor in his/her discretion" (giving examples) — appointment is listed separately, not among the discretionary examples.
- States that the "Council of Ministers... aids and advises Governor in exercise of his functions," indicating a routine constitutional role for ministers rather than a discretionary appointment power.
- Adds that the Governor exercises some functions "in his discretion," implying only specified functions are discretionary, not all (such as appointing ministers).
- Notes that the Constitution does not expressly enumerate discretionary powers of the Governor (except Assam), so discretionary powers are not broadly defined.
- Implies that appointment of ministers is not an explicitly stated discretionary power but depends on particular situations.
Lists governor's executive powers and explicitly states 'He/she appoints the chief minister and other ministers.'
A student could check whether this appointment power is exercised on ministerial advice (Articles 163/164) or in specific situations without advice to judge if it is discretionary.
Explains Article 163: the governor must act on aid and advice of the council of ministers except in matters where the governor is required to act in his/her discretion; and the governor's decision on what is discretionary is final.
One could use this rule to test whether appointing ministers is listed among constitutional 'discretionary' spheres or is normally covered by 'aid and advice'.
Gives concrete examples of functions the Constitution requires the Governor to exercise in his discretion (e.g., 6th Schedule para, administrator of UT independently of council).
A student could compare these examples with appointment powers to see if appointments are similarly specified as discretionary.
States the constitutional position: governor is nominal executive and must act with aid and advice of council of ministers except in matters of discretion (refers to Articles 154, 163, 164).
Use the cited articles as a checklist to determine whether ministerial appointments fall within ordinary (non‑discretionary) executive action or within exceptions.
Notes governor has power to appoint his Council of Ministers (alongside other appointments) but elsewhere the governor's powers are 'analogous' to President's and constrained.
Compare the governor's appointment role with the President's analogous powers and with the constitutional requirement of acting on advice to infer likely non‑discretionary character.
- Explicitly states 'Reservation of a State Bill for the assent of the President is a discretionary power of the Governor of a State.'
- Also describes the governor's option to reserve a bill for the President instead of giving or withholding assent (Article 201 context).
- Affirms that 'the governor is empowered to reserve certain types of bills passed by the state legislature for the consideration of the President', supporting existence of the reservation power.
- Provides context that such reservation places the bill under the President's authority (presidential assent/withholding).
- Notes controversy surrounding governors' use of discretion in reserving state bills, which presumes the exercise of discretionary power.
- Highlights that the discretionary nature of reservation has been disputed, indicating recognition of its practical application and contestation.
- This passage states the Governor 'shall make rules' for conducting State Government business, indicating a duty rather than a pure discretion.
- It ties rule-making directly to the convenient transaction and allocation of business among Ministers (an administrative function).
- This passage qualifies the rule-making power by excluding matters 'with respect to which the Governor is... required to act in his discretion', showing rule-making is not a general discretionary power.
- Together with the 'shall make rules' language, it shows rule-making is a prescribed function but limited where the Constitution assigns Governor discretionary action.
Explicitly lists as an executive power that the Governor 'can make rules for more convenient transaction of the business of a state government and for the allocation among the ministers of said business.'
A student could compare this formulation with the Constitution's distinction between functions 'to be performed in his discretion' and ordinary executive powers to see if the text frames rule-making as discretionary or as routine/formal.
Same authoritative statement (duplicate of 1) reinforcing that rule-making for conducting state business is listed under Governor's executive powers.
Use this repeated listing to justify checking constitutional provisions (e.g., Article references) or commentary to see whether such 'executive powers' are described as subject to advice of Council of Ministers or exercisable in discretion.
Presents 'Making the rules to conduct the business of the State Government' as an item in a list of gubernatorial functions (in a test-question context), indicating it is commonly treated as a standard gubernatorial power.
A student could use this to infer that the power is widely recognised and then check whether such listed items are generally discretionary or exercised on aid-and-advice of ministers.
Defines and gives examples of functions that are 'specially required by the Constitution to be exercised by the Governor in his discretion' and shows that discretionary functions are explicitly identified and limited.
Compare the examples of constitutionally explicit discretionary functions here with the rule-making power to determine whether it appears among constitutionally singled-out discretionary powers.
Notes that the Governor's measure of discretionary power is limited (citing Article 163(1) C) and that some duties are to be performed 'in his discretion' subject to President's directions in specific contexts.
A student could use this to investigate whether rule-making lies within those limited, constitutionally-specified discretionary spheres or within ordinary executive actions taken in the Governor's name but on ministerial advice.
- [THE VERDICT]: Sitter. Direct hit from Laxmikanth > Governor > 'Constitutional Position of Governor'. No current affairs needed.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Dual Role' of the Governor: Constitutional Head (bound by advice) vs. Agent of the Centre (discretionary).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the specific 'Constitutional Discretions': 1. Reserving Bills (Art 200), 2. Recommending President's Rule (Art 356), 3. Administering adjoining UT (Art 239(2)), 4. Determining royalty for Assam tribal areas (6th Schedule). Contrast these with 'Situational Discretions' (e.g., appointing CM in a hung assembly).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Whenever studying Constitutional bodies, apply the 'Democracy Test'. In a Parliamentary system, the unelected Head (Governor) generally cannot act alone on routine administration (like appointing ministers or making business rules). Discretion is the exception, not the norm.
The references explicitly list specific situations (including recommending President's Rule) as instances of the governor's constitutional discretion.
High-yield for questions on centre–state relations and constitutional offices; helps answer items on when governors may act independently versus on aid-and-advice. Master by memorising enumerated discretionary powers and mapping them to relevant Articles/case contexts.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
Several sources describe the governor's power to report under Article 356 and that such a report invites the President to assume state functions (President's Rule).
Frequently tested topic: grounds, procedure, and effects of President's Rule. Understand the governor's initiating role, parliamentary ratification, and administrative consequences; prepare by linking Article 356 text to textbook explanations and landmark examples.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 273
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 17: Emergency Provisions > Consequences of President's Rule > p. 179
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 7: FEDERALISM > Role of Governors and President's Rule > p. 166
References note that during President's Rule the governor acts on behalf of the President and enjoys extensive executive powers as the President’s agent.
Useful to explain post-proclamation administration and practical implications of recommending President's Rule. Study this to handle questions on functioning of state executive under emergency and centre’s administrative control.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 17: Emergency Provisions > Consequences of President's Rule > p. 179
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > Executive Powers > p. 316
References state the Governor 'appoints the chief minister and other ministers' and 'apart from the power to appoint his Council Ministers...' — showing the formal appointment power.
High-yield for UPSC as questions often probe the Governor's formal powers versus how they are exercised; links to the state executive and constitutional roles. Master by studying textual provisions and authoritative commentaries (to distinguish formal acts from politically guided actions).
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > Powers of the Governor. The Governor has no diplomatic or military powers like the President, but he possesses executive, legislative and judicial powers analogous to those of the President. > p. 272
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > Executive Powers > p. 316
Evidence explains that the Governor must act with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers except in matters where the Governor is to act in his/her discretion.
Crucial concept frequently tested: distinguishes nominal executive role from limited discretionary powers; connects to parliamentary form of government, Centre-State relations and judicial review. Prepare by memorising Article-related lines, key textbook explanations, and precedent summaries.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > NATURE OF ADVICE BY MINISTERS > p. 330
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 30: Governor > CONSTITUTIONAL POSITION OF GOVERNOR > p. 321
A reference lists constitutionally specified discretionary functions (examples from the 6th Schedule and Art. 239(2)), implying discretionary powers are narrow and specifically enumerated.
Important for UPSC to argue whether specific acts (like appointing ministers) are discretionary — knowing examples and limits helps answer judgment-type questions. Study by noting listed exceptions and contrasting them with general executive actions.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 13: The State Executive > THE STATE EXECUTIVE > p. 274
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 32: State Council of Ministers > NATURE OF ADVICE BY MINISTERS > p. 330
Central to the statement: references state the governor may reserve certain state bills for the President and label reservation a discretionary power.
High-yield for polity questions about governor’s legislative functions and Centre–State relations; links to Articles 200–201 and to debates on federalism. Master by memorising the governor’s alternatives on presentation of a bill and revising landmark controversies on reservation.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 11: The Union Executive > g) Assent to legislation and Veto. > p. 218
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 14: Federal System > IDI I Veto Over State Bills > p. 141
The 'Finality Clause' in Article 163(2): If a question arises whether a matter falls within the Governor's discretion, the Governor's decision is final, and the validity of anything done cannot be questioned on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion. This specific immunity is a potential future statement.
Apply the 'Responsible Government' logic. If Statement 2 (Appointing Ministers) were a discretionary power, the Governor could pack the cabinet with his own favorites, bypassing the elected Chief Minister. This violates the basic structure of Parliamentary Democracy. Thus, 2 is false. Eliminating 2 removes options A, C, and D instantly. Answer is B.
Mains GS-2 (Federalism): The misuse of these very discretionary powers (specifically Art 356 and Reserving Bills) is the core friction point in Centre-State relations. Link this to Sarkaria and Punchhi Commission recommendations (e.g., 'Governor should not be an active politician' or 'Time limit for reserving bills').