With reference to the "Tea Board" in India, consider the following statements : 1. The Tea Board is a statutory body. 2. It is a regulatory body attached to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. 3. The Tea Board's Head Office is situated in Bengaluru. 4. The Board has overseas offices at Dubai and Moscow. Which of the statements given above are correct ?

Defines a statutory body as one 'established by the Central Government under the provisions of a law enacted by the Parliament' and gives features (orders have force of law).

A student could check whether the Tea Board was created by a specific Act of Parliament (if yes, it is statutory) or not.

Gives an example (Bar Council of India) that was established under a specific statute (Advocates Act, 1961) and is therefore statutory.

Compare how the Bar Council was created (named Act) with the origin instrument for the Tea Board (look for a founding Act or legislation).

Another example: Animal Welfare Board is statutory and explicitly tied to a specific section of an Act (Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960).

Check for a similar citation of a specific Act/section for the Tea Board in primary legal sources or official websites.

Contrasts a non-statutory advisory body (Law Commission) that is created by government order for a fixed tenure, illustrating the alternate mode of creation.

If the Tea Board were created by executive order or resolution rather than by statute, this pattern would indicate it is non-statutory.

Notes that some bodies are created by executive resolution and later may be 'conferred a statutory status', showing that origin and later legislative change both matter.

Investigate whether the Tea Board's legal status changed over time (initially by resolution vs later by Act) to determine current statutory status.