Consider the following statements: 1. "The Climate Group" is an international non-profit organization that drives climate action by building large networks and runs them. 2. The International Energy Agency in partnership with the Climate Group launched a global initiative "EP100". 3. EP100 brings together leading companies committed to driving innovation in energy efficiency and increasing competitiveness while delivering on emission reduction goals. 4. Some Indian companies are members of EP100. 5. The International Energy Agency is the Secretariat to the "Under2 Coalition". Which of the statements given above are correct?

Describes a 'network-based programme' (INCCA) made of 100+ institutions and scientists — shows that climate action is sometimes organised by formal networks of actors.

A student could test whether The Climate Group similarly organizes many institutions (cities, businesses) into a formal network as part of its modus operandi.

Describes the InsuResilience Global Partnership which 'brings together' countries, civil society, international organisations and private sector — an example of an international partnership/network for climate action.

One could check whether The Climate Group is structured and described like these multi-actor international partnerships (i.e., convening diverse members across borders).

Nazca Climate Action Portal increases visibility of climate action among cities, regions, companies and investors, including those 'under international cooperative initiatives' — indicates portals/networks are used to coordinate climate action.

A student might look to see if The Climate Group operates similar portals or membership networks linking subnational actors and companies.

Mentions the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN), which provides technical assistance and capacity building — an explicit example of a networked international climate institution.

Use this as a model to ask whether The Climate Group functions as a specialized non-profit network providing coordination/assistance rather than, say, a single-country agency.

Notes that global climate finance is channelled through multilateral funds and bilateral channels — shows climate action commonly operates through international institutional architectures.

A student could compare The Climate Group's scope (international vs national) and funding/affiliation patterns against these multilateral/bilateral architectures to judge its international/non-profit character.