"Climate Action Tracker" which monitors the emission reduction pledges of different countries is a:

Gives a clear example that 'electronic databases' are used to track greenhouse‑gas related transactions and mechanisms in the climate domain.

A student could infer that similarly named climate 'trackers' might be electronic databases and then check whether Climate Action Tracker functions as such a tracking database.

Describes the 'Climate Equity Monitor' as an online dashboard for assessing international climate action, showing that monitoring databases/dashboards are produced for policy assessment.

Use this example to reason that the Climate Action Tracker could likewise be an online monitoring tool and then verify its format and provenance.

Describes INCCA as a network‑based programme of over 100 institutions and 200 scientists, illustrating that coalitions/networks of research organisations produce climate assessments.

From this, a student could consider whether Climate Action Tracker might be produced by a similar network of research organisations and then look for evidence of institutional collaborators.

Mentions building alliances and partnerships through global collaboration in research & technology development on climate change, showing that collaborative research arrangements are common.

A student could apply this pattern to expect collaborative authorship of major climate databases and then check the Climate Action Tracker's listed partners or authorship.

Gives an example of a climate project launched jointly by national and international bodies, indicating multi‑organisation initiatives create analytical tools for climate action.

Use this as support for the idea that databases/analytical tools often result from multi‑organisation projects and then search for whether the Climate Action Tracker was established by multiple research bodies.

Defines UNEP as the leading global environmental authority that sets agendas and promotes implementation — showing UNEP often plays a promotional/advocacy role for environmental initiatives.

A student could use this pattern to check whether UNEP typically 'promotes' external tracking initiatives (like Climate Action Tracker) by searching UNEP publications or partnership lists for the Tracker's name.

Shows UNEP co‑created major scientific bodies (IPCC) with other organizations (WMO), indicating UNEP sometimes helps establish or support independent scientific/policy bodies.

One could extend this by looking for founding/partnership statements for the Climate Action Tracker to see if UNEP (or similar agencies) are listed as co‑founders or supporters.

Describes the World Bank administering significant climate finance instruments (Clean Technology Fund) — showing the Bank often acts as financier/administrator for climate programs.

Use this pattern to investigate whether the World Bank channels funds to organizations like the Climate Action Tracker by checking World Bank trust fund portfolios and funding recipients.

Gives an example (UN‑REDD) of multiple UN agencies (including UNEP) collaborating to establish a multi‑donor trust fund — illustrating that UN agencies sometimes collaborate with financiers to set up funded programs.

A student could search multi‑agency trust fund records or donor lists to see if the Climate Action Tracker is listed as a funded program or partner of such UN‑administered funds.

Notes UNEP's role in providing funding (via GEF collaboration) to protect the global environment, indicating UNEP can be involved in funding mechanisms.

This suggests checking GEF/UNEP funding disbursement records or partnership announcements for mention of the Climate Action Tracker to test whether UNEP finances it.