"Climate Action Tracker" which monitors the emission reduction pledges of different countries is a:

Gives a clear example that 'electronic databases' are used to track greenhouse‑gas related transactions and mechanisms in the climate domain.

A student could infer that similarly named climate 'trackers' might be electronic databases and then check whether Climate Action Tracker functions as such a tracking database.

Describes the 'Climate Equity Monitor' as an online dashboard for assessing international climate action, showing that monitoring databases/dashboards are produced for policy assessment.

Use this example to reason that the Climate Action Tracker could likewise be an online monitoring tool and then verify its format and provenance.

Describes INCCA as a network‑based programme of over 100 institutions and 200 scientists, illustrating that coalitions/networks of research organisations produce climate assessments.

From this, a student could consider whether Climate Action Tracker might be produced by a similar network of research organisations and then look for evidence of institutional collaborators.

Mentions building alliances and partnerships through global collaboration in research & technology development on climate change, showing that collaborative research arrangements are common.

A student could apply this pattern to expect collaborative authorship of major climate databases and then check the Climate Action Tracker's listed partners or authorship.

Gives an example of a climate project launched jointly by national and international bodies, indicating multi‑organisation initiatives create analytical tools for climate action.

Use this as support for the idea that databases/analytical tools often result from multi‑organisation projects and then search for whether the Climate Action Tracker was established by multiple research bodies.