Consider the following pairs : International agreement / set-up Subject 1. Alma-Ata Declaration Healthcare of the people 2. Hague Convention Biological and chemical weapons 3. Talanoa Dialogue Global climate change 4. Under2 Coalition - Child rights Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched ?

This snippet shows that international declarations (e.g., Changwon) explicitly link declarations to human wellbeing and health as core themes.

A student could infer that similar international declarations (like Alma‑Ata) may likewise focus on health and so check the Alma‑Ata text for explicit 'health for all' language.

The Kunming Declaration example demonstrates that multilateral declarations can prioritize biodiversity in terms of protecting human health, illustrating a pattern where declarations state specific health-related goals.

Using this pattern, a student could reasonably look for goal-oriented phrasing (e.g., 'health for all') in Alma‑Ata to confirm whether it concerns population health and primary care.

This classroom snippet lists primary healthcare centres, doctors, and related infrastructure as key contributors to human capital, defining 'primary healthcare' as a recognizable concept in education materials.

A student can use this standard notion of primary healthcare to interpret Alma‑Ata: if Alma‑Ata emphasizes primary healthcare infrastructure, it likely aligns with 'health for all' aims.

National policy described here aims at improving accessibility of healthcare and primary healthcare/services for underprivileged groups, reflecting the typical objectives associated with 'Health for All'.

Given that 'Health for All' involves accessibility and primary services, a student could check whether Alma‑Ata prescribes similar accessibility and primary care measures to judge the statement.

This snippet defines what international protocols/declarations do—strengthening commitments and adding detailed obligations—showing that declarations often set programmatic goals.

Knowing declarations commonly set specific commitments, a student could look for Alma‑Ata language that establishes primary healthcare commitments to infer its concern with 'Health for All'.

Gives concrete examples of named international conventions that specifically address biological and chemical weapons (the Biological Weapons Convention and the Chemical Weapons Convention).

A student could use this pattern (check the formal names of conventions that govern B/C weapons) to see whether a 'Hague Convention' appears among those names or is separate.

Explains the general pattern that international 'protocols' are additional agreements linked to existing conventions, showing how arms/weapon-related rules are organized into named treaties and protocols.

A student can apply this rule to look for whether B/C weapon controls are enacted as standalone conventions or as protocols attached to another convention (and whether 'Hague' appears as either).

Shows that multilateral treaties can be titled for specific hazards (here, Rotterdam Convention for hazardous chemicals and pesticides), illustrating that chemical controls are usually in clearly named agreements.

A student could compare treaty names (e.g., 'Chemical Weapons Convention' vs. 'Hague Convention') to judge which treaty likely covers chemical hazards.

Describes how conventions list and regulate chemicals (Annexes, PIC procedure), indicating that chemical control is typically handled by specialized treaty instruments with annexes and procedures.

A student could expect a treaty dealing with chemical weapons to have specific annexes/procedures and then check whether the 'Hague Convention' contains such chemical/weapon-specific provisions.

States that a 'Convention' (CITES) is an international agreement between governments with a clear subject matter, reinforcing the idea that treaty names reflect their domain.

A student can infer that the subject in a convention's title usually indicates its remit and therefore check whether 'Hague Convention' title/description corresponds to biological/chemical weapons or another domain.