Question map
With reference to Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha, consider the following statements : 1. As per the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, the election of Deputy Speaker shall be held on such date as the Speaker may fix. 2. There is a mandatory provision that the election of a candidate as Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha shall be from either the principal opposition party or the ruling party. 3. The Deputy Speaker has the same power as of the Speaker when presiding over the sitting of the House and no appeal lies against his rulings. 4. The well established parliamentary practice regarding the appointment of Deputy Speaker is that the motion is moved by the Speaker and duly seconded by the Prime Minister. Which of the statements given above are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 and 3 only) based on the following constitutional and procedural provisions:
- Statement 1 is correct: Under Rule 8 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, the election of the Deputy Speaker is held on a date fixed by the Speaker. (Note: The President fixes the date for the Speaker's election).
- Statement 3 is correct: When presiding, the Deputy Speaker enjoys all powers of the Speaker. Their rulings are final within the House, and no appeal lies against them to the Speaker or any other authority.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: There is no mandatory legal or constitutional provision requiring the Deputy Speaker to be from a specific party. While a parliamentary convention evolved since the 11th Lok Sabha to offer the post to the Opposition, it is not a rule.
- Statement 4 is incorrect: The motion for electing the Deputy Speaker is moved by a member and seconded by another member, not necessarily the Speaker and Prime Minister.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a classic 'Static + Common Sense' hybrid. Statements 1 and 3 are direct lifts from Laxmikanth (Chapter: Parliament). Statement 2 tests your awareness of 'Convention vs. Constitution'—a favorite UPSC trap. Statement 4 is a procedural bluff designed to sound authoritative but is factually incorrect.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: According to the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, does the Speaker fix the date for the election of the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha?
- Statement 2: Is there any mandatory provision that the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha must be a member of either the principal opposition party or the ruling party?
- Statement 3: When presiding over a sitting of the Lok Sabha, does the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha have the same powers as the Speaker?
- Statement 4: Are the rulings of the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha final and not subject to appeal?
- Statement 5: Is it established parliamentary practice that the motion for appointment of the Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha is moved by the Speaker and seconded by the Prime Minister?
- Directly asserts that the date of election of the Deputy Speaker is fixed by the Speaker.
- Places the election sequence as occurring after the Speaker's election, clarifying procedure timing.
- Refers to the Lok Sabha's internal election process, implying Rule-based practice.
- Explicitly repeats that the date of election of the Deputy Speaker is fixed by the Speaker.
- Confirms vacancy-filling procedure and tenure context, reinforcing procedural authority.
- Describes the practice as 'informal', indicating it is convention rather than a mandatory/legal requirement.
- Contrasts convention with constitutional/Article provisions (Article 94) about continuity, showing role is regulated but party-affiliation for Deputy Speaker is customary.
- Explicitly labels the selection as a 'parliamentary convention', not a statutory or constitutional mandate.
- Notes the Deputy Speaker is 'elected ... among the elected members of parliament' by majority, implying no legal party-based requirement.
- Reiterates that the post is 'conventionally' handed to the Opposition, reinforcing that this is a tradition rather than a compulsory provision.
- Frames the convention as intended to balance ruling party and Opposition, again implying a normative (not mandatory) practice.
States the customary pattern: 'Usually... the post of Deputy Speaker goes to the opposition party... However, there have been certain exceptional cases', indicating practice not a binding rule.
A student could treat this as evidence of convention and check primary sources (Constitution/Rules) to see if the custom is codified or only a convention.
Repeats the 'usually... goes to the opposition... however, there have been exceptions' pattern, reinforcing that party allocation is customary rather than mandatory.
Combine with knowledge that customs can be broken; therefore examine the text of the Rules of Procedure or Constitution to confirm whether any binding clause exists.
Explains the formal selection mechanism: 'Like the Speaker, the Deputy Speaker is also elected by the Lok Sabha itself from amongst its members', implying election by members rather than appointment by party.
A student could infer that, since election is by members, party affiliation alone need not be a statutory criterion and should check election rules/eligibility clauses for any party requirement.
Contains a test question listing as a proposition that 'There is a mandatory provision that the election... should be from either the principal opposition party or the ruling party', showing this is a debatable claim presented for evaluation (not asserted as fact).
Use this to suspect the claim may be a common misconception and verify against authoritative texts (Constitution/Rules of Procedure).
Presents a similar statement for consideration: 'According to the provisions laid down in the Constitution of India, in Lok Sabha, the Speaker's post goes to the majority party and the Deputy Speaker's to the Opposition' — again posed as a statement to evaluate rather than quoted as established law.
A student can treat this as indicating a widely held but contestable view and check the Constitution to confirm whether such allocation is actually prescribed.
- Specifies that a member of the Lok Sabha panel of chairpersons 'has the same power as the Speaker when so presiding', establishing a general rule about presiding authority.
- Connects the concept of a substitute presiding officer being vested with the Speaker's powers while chairing.
- Explicitly records that the Deputy Speaker presides in the Speaker's absence (including at joint sittings).
- Links the Deputy Speaker to the role of chairing the House, which is the context where presiding powers would apply.
- Shows the Deputy Speaker is elected 'like the Speaker' and is a designated presiding officer of the Lok Sabha.
- Establishes the institutional parity in office-holding that supports interpreting the Deputy Speaker as exercising presiding functions.
States that the Deputy Speaker is elected 'like the Speaker' and remains in office usually during the life of the Lok Sabha, implying structural parity between the two offices.
A student could take the parity claim and check whether powers (including ruling-finality) that are explicitly vested in the Speaker are by rule extended to the Deputy Speaker when acting as chair.
Explains that members of the panel of chairpersons 'have the same power as the Speaker when so presiding', establishing a rule that presiding officers exercise Speaker-like powers while presiding.
Apply this rule to ask whether the Deputy Speaker, when presiding, similarly enjoys the Speaker's finality in rulings (compare specific Speaker powers to rules on appeals).
States a concrete example where 'final power' is expressly vested in the Speaker (deciding whether a bill is a Money Bill), showing that some Speaker decisions are explicitly final.
A student can compare which Speaker powers are explicitly declared final and then investigate whether equivalent powers when exercised by the Deputy Speaker are treated the same under the Rules of Procedure.
Notes that the Deputy Speaker presides over a joint sitting in the absence of the Speaker, indicating the Deputy Speaker performs high‑authority, decision-making roles in place of the Speaker.
Combine this with known instances of Speaker finality to hypothesise that rulings made by the Deputy Speaker while presiding might carry similar finality and then verify via procedural rules.
Reiterates that the Deputy Speaker is elected from among members and follows similar tenure rules as the Speaker, reinforcing institutional equivalence between the offices.
Use institutional equivalence as a basis to inspect whether the same limitations or non‑appealability that apply to Speaker rulings are also applied to Deputy Speaker rulings.
States that the Deputy Speaker is elected by the Lok Sabha and that the date of election is fixed by the Speaker, indicating the Speaker has a formal role in initiating the election process.
A student could check the Rules of Procedure (or past proceedings) to see whether the Speaker also formally moves the motion on the fixed date and who traditionally seconds it.
Repeats that the Deputy Speaker is elected by the Lok Sabha and that the Speaker fixes the date — a procedural pattern tying the Speaker to the election timetable.
Use this to focus research on procedural manuals (Rules of Procedure) or Lok Sabha daily sittings to find who formally moves/seconds motions on the election day.
Refers explicitly to 'Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha' in the context of Deputy Speaker election, implying formal rules govern the election procedure.
A student should consult the cited Rules of Procedure to see whether they specify who moves or seconds the motion for appointment.
Describes the Deputy Speaker's responsibilities and independence (directly responsible to the House), reinforcing that the office and its election are matters of House procedure rather than executive appointment.
This suggests the motion is a parliamentary (House) matter; check parliamentary records to see which House officers or members customarily move/second such motions.
Notes the existence of presiding officers (Speaker and Deputy Speaker), underlining that roles and appointments of presiding officers are governed within House practice.
Combine this with knowledge that presiding officers are selected by House procedure to search for precedents or customs on who moves/seconds their appointment.
- [THE VERDICT]: Solvable Sitter. If you knew the 'Convention vs. Mandatory' distinction (Statement 2) and the basic election date rule (Statement 1), you could crack this without knowing the obscure Statement 4.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Parliament > Presiding Officers > Comparison of Speaker vs. Deputy Speaker (Election, Removal, Powers).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: (1) Speaker election date is fixed by the President; Deputy Speaker election date is fixed by the Speaker. (2) Speaker resigns to Deputy Speaker; Deputy Speaker resigns to Speaker. (3) In Joint Sittings: Speaker → Deputy Speaker → Deputy Chairman of RS (Chairman RS *never* presides). (4) Deputy Speaker is *not* subordinate to the Speaker; they are directly responsible to the House.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When reading Polity, always segregate rules into three buckets: Constitutional Articles (Mandatory), Rules of Procedure (Binding but internal), and Conventions (Customary but not legally binding). UPSC swaps these buckets to create trap statements.
Speaker sets the date for electing the Deputy Speaker.
High-yield for questions on parliamentary procedure and internal House administration; links to topics on presiding officers' discretionary powers and election sequencing within the Lok Sabha; helps answer questions about who controls parliamentary scheduling and interim arrangements.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
The Deputy Speaker is elected after the Speaker, indicating a fixed sequence in House procedures.
Important for framing questions on institutional hierarchy and procedural order; connects to broader topics on formation of House offices and continuity of presiding functions; useful for elimination in MCQs about order of events after a general election.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
Deputy Speaker normally serves for the life of the Lok Sabha and vacancies are filled by Lok Sabha elections.
Relevant for questions on tenure, resignation, and vacancy procedures of parliamentary offices; links to comparative study of Speaker and Deputy Speaker roles and to rules on removal and succession.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
The Deputy Speaker is chosen by the Lok Sabha from among its members rather than by party nomination.
High-yield for questions on parliamentary offices: clarifies the formal selection mechanism and distinguishes member-based election from party-prescription. Connects to topics on constitutional procedure, legislative functioning and comparisons with other presiding offices.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 231
The practice of giving the Deputy Speaker to the opposition is a convention and not a compulsory legal requirement.
Important for answering questions that test the difference between constitutional provisions and parliamentary conventions; helps in evaluating whether practices are mandatory or customary and applies to many queries about parliamentary conventions.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 232
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 232
Normally the Speaker comes from the ruling side and the Deputy Speaker from the opposition, though exceptions have occurred.
Useful factual kernel for polity answers and for constructing balanced answers on tradition versus exception; links to questions on house leadership, impartiality of presiding officers and historical practice.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 232
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 232
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Speaker of Lok Sabha > p. 229
The person who actually presides over the House assumes the Speaker's powers while chairing.
High-yield for questions on parliamentary procedure: knowing that presiding authority transfers to the chair enables correct answers on who rules on points of order, conducts proceedings, and exercises procedural discretion. Links to topics on delegation of powers and temporary officeholders in legislature-related questions.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Panel of Chairpersons of Lok Sabha > p. 232
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > JOINT SITTING OF TWO HOUSES > p. 250
The 'Panel of Chairpersons' trap: A member of the Panel can preside when the Speaker/Deputy Speaker are *absent*, but CANNOT preside when the offices are *vacant*. In vacancy, the President appoints a Speaker Pro Tem.
Apply the 'Real World Reality Check'. Statement 2 claims it is a 'mandatory provision' that the Deputy Speaker comes from the Opposition. If it were mandatory, the government would be legally sued for keeping the post vacant or giving it to an ally. The fact that it is often a subject of political debate proves it is a Convention, not a Law. Eliminate Statement 2.
Mains GS-2 (Parliamentary Functioning): The prolonged vacancy of the Deputy Speaker post in recent Lok Sabhas highlights the erosion of 'Parliamentary Convention' and the weakening of opposition rights, as the post is traditionally a check held by the Opposition.