Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement-I : Marsupials are not naturally found in India. Statement-II : Marsupials can thrive only in montane grasslands with no predators. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 3: Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect.
Statement-I is correct: Marsupials (mammals that carry young in pouches, such as kangaroos and koalas) are not native to India. They are geographically restricted primarily to Australasia and the Americas. India’s mammalian fauna consists almost entirely of placental mammals.
Statement-II is incorrect: The claim that marsupials can thrive only in montane grasslands with no predators is factually wrong. Marsupials are highly adaptable and inhabit diverse ecosystems, including tropical rainforests, deserts, and temperate forests. Furthermore, they coexist with various natural predators (like the Dingo or Tasmanian Devil). Their evolutionary success in Australia was due to long-term geographic isolation rather than a total absence of predators or a restriction to specific montane habitats.
Since the first statement is a factual geographical truth and the second is a restrictive biological fallacy, Option 3 is the only valid choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewStatement I is basic static knowledge covered in standard texts (Shankar/Majid) regarding Zoogeographical realms. Statement II is a 'logic trap' using extreme qualifiers ('only', 'no predators'). You didn't need the specific research paper; you needed common sense and basic biogeography.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are there any marsupial species native to India (i.e., naturally occurring without human introduction)?
- Statement 2: Are marsupials restricted to montane grasslands as their only habitat?
- Statement 3: Do marsupials require the absence of predators in their environment in order to thrive?
- Labels 'List of Marsupials (pouched mammals of Australia)', explicitly linking marsupials to Australia rather than India.
- Enumerates typical Australasian marsupials (kangaroo, koala, wallaby, etc.), none described as Indian natives.
- Defines marsupials as pouched mammals with examples (wallaby, kangaroo) that are conventionally Australasian.
- Provides characteristic biology of marsupials but contains no reference to Indian native marsupials, reinforcing their typical non-Indian distribution.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.