Question map
Consider the following statements : Statement-I : Syndicated lending spreads the risk of borrower default across multiple lenders. Statement-II : The syndicated loan can be a fixed amount/lump sum of funds, but cannot be a credit line. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements ?
Explanation
**Statement-I is correct**: A syndicated loan is a credit facility or fixed loan amount offered by a pool of lenders, which are collectively referred to as syndicates.[1] By definition, when multiple lenders participate in a syndicate, the risk of borrower default is naturally distributed among them rather than being concentrated with a single lender.
**Statement-II is incorrect**: Syndicated loans are structured as credit lines or as fixed amounts.[3] This directly contradicts Statement-II's claim that syndicated loans "cannot be a credit line." In fact, syndicated loans can take either form – they can be structured as fixed-amount term loans or as revolving credit lines (revolvers), giving borrowers flexibility in how they access the funds.
Since Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect, **option C** is the right answer.
SourcesPROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Definition + Feature' question. Statement I is intuitive (Syndicate = Group = Shared Risk). Statement II is a 'Technical Trap' using an extreme negative ('cannot'). While specific books don't explicitly list syndicated loan types, the logic of financial markets (flexibility) allows you to eliminate the restriction in S2.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Describes a review process when a borrower defaults that involves lenders acting together and entering an inter-creditor agreement (ICA).
- ICA provisions make decisions by a qualifying majority binding on all lenders, implying lenders share exposure and coordinate loss resolution.
- The need for an ICA implies credit is provided by several lenders rather than a single creditor, so default risk is managed collectively.
- Explains the co-lending model where banks and NBFCs jointly fund loans, each contributing different strengths (funds vs. local reach).
- Joint funding by bank and NBFC implies credit exposure and associated risk are split across the participating institutions.
- Emphasis on empowering various stakeholders shows lending obligations and risks are shared among participants.
- Defines P2P lending as a platform that pairs borrowers with individual investors who lend their own money.
- Borrowers receive funds from a pool of individual lenders and repayments are forwarded to those lenders, so credit risk is dispersed across investors.
- The model's structure contrasts single-lender loans by allocating default exposure to many small creditors.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.