Question map
Which of the following statements are correct in respect of a Money Bill in the Parliament ? 1. Article 109 mentions special procedure in respect of Money Bills. 2. A Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States. 3. The Rajya Sabha can either approve the Bill or suggest changes but cannot reject it. 4. Amendments to a Money Bill suggested by the Rajya Sabha have to be accepted by the Lok Sabha. Select the answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is option C because statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct.
Article 109 mentions special procedure in respect of Money Bills[1], making statement 1 correct. A money bill can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and a Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States[3], confirming statement 2 is correct. The Rajya Sabha can either approve the bill or suggest changes but cannot reject it, as it cannot reject or [4]amend a money bill and can only make recommendations[5], making statement 3 correct.
However, statement 4 is incorrect. The Lok Sabha can either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha[5], and amendments to the bill suggested by Rajya Sabha may or may not be accepted by the Lok Sabha[6]. This means the Lok Sabha is not obligated to accept Rajya Sabha's suggestions. Therefore, only statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct, making option C the right answer.
Sources- [1] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > READ A CARTOON > p. 114
- [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 247
- [3] Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 253
- [4] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT MAKE LAWS? > p. 113
- [5] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 248
- [6] Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT MAKE LAWS? > p. 113
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis is a 'reward for diligence' question. It rewards reading the core text of NCERT and Laxmikanth line-by-line without skimming. If you missed this, you aren't struggling with difficulty; you are struggling with the basics of the Constitution.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Does Article 109 of the Constitution of India provide a special procedure for Money Bills in the Parliament of India?
- Statement 2: Under the Constitution of India, can a Money Bill be introduced in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) in the Parliament of India?
- Statement 3: Under the Constitution of India, is the Rajya Sabha in the Parliament of India limited to approving a Money Bill or suggesting amendments and not empowered to reject a Money Bill?
- Statement 4: Under the Constitution of India, are amendments to a Money Bill suggested by the Rajya Sabha required to be accepted by the Lok Sabha in the Parliament of India?
- Directly names Article 109 as 'Special procedure in respect of Money Bills'.
- Begins the Article text with the rule that a Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States, indicating a distinct procedure.
- Explicitly states the Constitution lays down a special procedure for passing Money Bills in Parliament.
- Specifies introduction rules (only in Lok Sabha, on President's recommendation), showing procedural distinctness.
- Describes the procedure for passing Money Bills in Parliament and repeats that a Money Bill shall not be introduced in the Council of States.
- Frames the limited role of the upper house, underscoring the special procedure.
- Explicitly states a money bill can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha, not the Rajya Sabha
- Notes the Speaker endorses a bill as a Money Bill before transmission to the Rajya Sabha
- Specifies introduction occurs on the recommendation of the President and by a minister
- Directly declares a money bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha
- Explains that after passage in Lok Sabha the bill is sent to the Rajya Sabha for consideration
- States as a point of unequal status that a Money Bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and not in the Rajya Sabha
- Adds the Rajya Sabha's role is limited (cannot amend/reject; returns within 14 days)
- Explicitly says Rajya Sabha can approve or suggest changes but cannot reject a money bill.
- Mentions the 14-day period after which inaction leads to the bill being deemed passed, reinforcing limited Rajya Sabha powers.
- States Rajya Sabha has restricted powers: it cannot reject or amend a money bill and can only make recommendations.
- Explains Lok Sabha may accept or reject Rajya Sabha's recommendations, confirming Rajya Sabha cannot unilaterally block a money bill.
- Lists powers exercised only by the Lok Sabha and asserts Rajya Sabha cannot initiate, reject or amend money bills.
- Links this restriction to the principle of Lok Sabha's primacy in financial matters, supporting the claim of limited Rajya Sabha power.
- Explicitly says Rajya Sabha can suggest changes but cannot reject a money bill.
- Directly states amendments/recommendations by Rajya Sabha 'may or may not be accepted by the Lok Sabha.'
- States Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject a money bill and can only make recommendations.
- Makes clear the Lok Sabha 'can either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations' of Rajya Sabha.
- Notes Appropriation and Finance Bills are money bills sent to Rajya Sabha for consideration.
- Specifies that it is for the Lok Sabha to accept or reject any recommendations made by the Rajya Sabha.
- [THE VERDICT]: Absolute Sitter. Direct lift from Laxmikanth (Ch: Parliament) and NCERT Class XI (Indian Constitution at Work, Ch: Legislature).
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The 'Legislative Procedure' theme, specifically the asymmetry of power between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha regarding Financial Administration.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Money Bill Trinity': Article 109 (Procedure), Article 110 (Definition), Article 111 (Assent). Contrast this with Financial Bill Type I (Art 117(1)) and Type II (Art 117(3)). Note the Joint Sitting applicability (Art 108)βallowed for Financial Bills, banned for Money Bills.
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: The examiner tests 'Modal Verbs' in Polity. Statement 4 uses 'have to be accepted' (compulsion). In Money Bills, the Lok Sabha's will is supreme. Always check if a statement implies the Rajya Sabha can 'dictate' terms on money; if yes, it's false.
Article 109 is the constitutional provision that designates a distinct procedure for Money Bills in Parliament.
High-yield for legislative procedure questions; directly tests knowledge of constitutional article numbering and special financial procedures. Connects to questions on bill classification and passage in Parliament, and enables elimination in MCQs about which Article covers Money Bill procedures.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > READ A CARTOON > p. 114
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 253
The rule that Money Bills cannot be introduced in the Council of States and must originate in the House of the People is central to the special procedure.
Crucial for UPSC questions on differences between Houses and bill origination; links to broader topics like parliamentary powers and legislative checks. Useful for scenario questions asking which house can introduce or amend financial legislation.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > READ A CARTOON > p. 114
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 247
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 253
The upper house has restricted powers (recommendation only, time-limited) when a Money Bill is transmitted to it.
Important for comparative questions on bicameral powers and financial supremacy of Lok Sabha; aids in answering questions on amendment/rejection powers and timelines for Money Bills. Connects to state legislature parallels where councils have similar restricted powers.
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 259
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 33: State Legislature > Money Bills > p. 343
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 253
Money Bills must be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha.
High-yield constitutional detail frequently tested on legislative procedure and division of powers between Houses. Connects to distinctions between Money Bills and Ordinary Bills and to questions about parliamentary supremacy and checks on finance. Mastering this helps answer procedural and comparative questions on Union and state legislatures.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 247
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT MAKE LAWS? > p. 113
The Speaker of the Lok Sabha certifies a bill as a Money Bill before it is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha, and that certification is final.
Important for questions on Article 110 and the role of presiding officers in legislative procedure; ties into debates on judicial review and finality of constitutional functionaries. Useful for questions about institutional roles and limits on Parliament's Houses.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 247
- Introduction to the Constitution of India, D. D. Basu (26th ed.). > Chapter 12: The Union Legislature > p. 254
The Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject Money Bills and must return them to the Lok Sabha within 14 days, with or without recommendations.
Crucial for understanding bicameral limits and the asymmetry between Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha; helps answer questions about legislative checks, federal balance, and special procedures for financial legislation. Frequently appears in comparisons of Union vs state legislative procedures.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Unequal Status with Lok Sabha > p. 260
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Unequal Status with Lok Sabha > p. 260
Defines that Rajya Sabha cannot reject a Money Bill and can only recommend changes or approve it.
High-yield for questions on legislative procedure and powers of Parliament; connects with topics on bicameralism and checks on financial legislation. Mastery helps answer direct-knowledge and comparison questions about house-specific powers.
- Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT MAKE LAWS? > p. 113
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 248
The 'Presidential Veto' Trap: While the President can withhold assent to a Money Bill (Absolute Veto), he CANNOT return it for reconsideration (Suspensive Veto). This is because it is introduced with his prior permission. This is the next logical question in the sequence.
The 'Purse String' Logic: In any democracy, the directly elected house controls the money. Statement 4 claims the Lok Sabha *must* accept RS amendments. This violates the core principle of Lok Sabha supremacy in finance. If RS could force amendments, it would hold the government hostage. Thus, Statement 4 is logically impossible.
Mains GS-2 (Parliamentary System): This procedural limitation on the Rajya Sabha highlights the principle of 'No Taxation Without Representation'. Since RS is indirectly elected, it cannot control the public purse. This is a key argument in debates about the 'Federal vs Unitary' bias of the Constitution.