Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q94 (IAS/2024) Polity & Governance › Parliament › Parliamentary procedures Official Key

With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution. 2. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

Result
Your answer: —  ·  Correct: B
Explanation

The correct answer is option B (statements 1 and 2 are correct).

Statement 1 is correct: A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution, whether it originated in the Lok Sabha or was transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha.[3]

Statement 2 is correct: A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha also lapses upon dissolution of the Lok Sabha.[3]

Statement 3 is incorrect: A bill not passed by the two Houses due to disagreement does not lapse if the President has notified the holding of a joint sitting before the dissolution of Lok Sabha.[3] The joint sitting can be held even if the Lok Sabha is dissolved after the President has notified his/her intention to summon such a sitting, as the bill does not lapse in this case.[6]

Therefore, only statements 1 and 2 are correct, making option B the right answer.

Sources
  1. [1] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Dissolution > p. 237
  2. [2] Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Dissolution > p. 237
  3. [3] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Dissolution > p. 237
  4. [4] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > JOINT SITTING OF TWO HOUSES > p. 250
  5. [5] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > JOINT SITTING OF TWO HOUSES > p. 250
  6. [6] Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > JOINT SITTING OF TWO HOUSES > p. 250
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
52%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolutio…
At a glance
Origin: From standard books Fairness: High fairness Books / CA: 10/10 · 0/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

This is a textbook 'Sitter' from Laxmikanth. It rewards the serious aspirant who has memorized the specific rules of parliamentary procedure. If you got this wrong, it indicates a gap in your core static revision, not a lack of advanced knowledge.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
In the Indian Parliament, does a bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > Dissolution > p. 237
Presence: 5/5
“They (to be pursued further) must be reintroduced in the newly-constituted Lok Sabha. However, some pending bills and all pending assurances that are to be examined by the Committee on Government Assurances do not lapse on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. The position with respect to lapsing of bills is as follows: • 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses (whether originating in the Lok Sabha or transmitted to it by the Rajya Sabha).• 2. A bill passed by the LokSabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses.• 3. A bill not passed by the two Houses due to disagreement and if the President has notified the holding of a joint sitting before the dissolution of Lok Sabha, does not lapse.• 4.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly states that a bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses, whether it originated there or was transmitted from the Rajya Sabha.
  • Directly addresses lapsing on dissolution of the Lok Sabha with no conditional exception in this clause.
Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 23: Parliament > JOINT SITTING OF TWO HOUSES > p. 250
Presence: 4/5
“If the bill (under dispute) has already lapsed due to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, no joint sitting can be summoned. But, the joint sitting can be held if the Lok Sabha is dissolved after the President has notified his/ her intention to summon such a sitting (as the bill does not lapse in this case). After the President notifies his/ her intention to summon a joint sitting of the two Houses, none of the Houses can proceed further with the bill. The Speaker of Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of the two Houses and the Deputy Speaker, in his/her absence.”
Why this source?
  • Explains the practical consequence that if a bill has lapsed due to dissolution, a joint sitting cannot be summoned.
  • Also identifies a specific exception: if the President has notified intention to summon a joint sitting before dissolution, the bill does not lapse.
Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CDS-I · 2006 · Q39 Relevance score: 7.06

Consider the following statements:When Lok Sabha is dissolved, 1. a Bill pending in Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by Lok Sabha lapses. 2. a Bill pending in Lok Sabha lapses. 3. a Bill passed by both Houses but pending assent of the President of India does not lapse. Which of the statements given above is/ are correct ?

IAS · 2016 · Q1 Relevance score: 6.28

Which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. A Bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its prorogation. 2. A Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha, which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha, shall not lapse on dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Select the correct answer using the code given below.

IAS · 2023 · Q37 Relevance score: 6.08

With reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. When the Lok Sabha transmits Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill. 2. When the Lok Sabha transmits Money Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it cannot amend or reject the Bill, it can only make recommendations. 3. In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, there is no joint sitting for Money Bill, but a joint sitting becomes necessary for Finance Bill. How many of the above statements are correct?

NDA-II · 2008 · Q97 Relevance score: 5.94

Consider the following statements : 1. A bill pending in the Legislature of a State shall not lapse by reason of the propogation of the House or Houses thereof. 2. A bill pending in the Legislative Council of a State which has not been passed by the Legislative assembly shall not lapse on dissolution of the Assembly. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

IAS · 2003 · Q88 Relevance score: 5.40

Consider the following statements: 1. The joint sitting of the two houses of the Parliament in India is sanctioned under Article 108 of the Constitution 2. The first joint sitting of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha was held in the year 1961 3. The second joint sitting of the two Houses of Indian Parliament was held to pass the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill Which of these statements are correct?