Question map
Which of the following statements with regard to recommendations of the 15th Finance Commission of India are correct? I. It has recommended grants of ₹ 4,800 crores from the year 2022-23 to the year 2025-26 for incentivizing States to enhance educational outcomes. II. 45% of the net proceeds of Union taxes are to be shared with States. III. ₹ 45,000 crores are to be kept as performance-based incentive for all States for carrying out agricultural reforms. IV. It reintroduced tax effort criteria to reward fiscal performance. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Explanation
The correct answer is option C (I, III, and IV are correct).
**Statement I is correct**: The 15th Finance Commission recommended grants of Rs 4,800 crore for educational outcomes[1], which aligns with the statement's claim about incentivizing states to enhance educational outcomes.
**Statement II is incorrect**: The 15th Finance Commission recommended 41% (not 45%) of the net proceeds of Union taxes to be shared with states. This is a well-established fact about the Commission's recommendations for the 2021-26 period.
**Statement III is correct**: The Commission allocated Rs 45,000 crores for implementation[2] of agricultural reforms, which serves as a performance-based incentive for states.
**Statement IV is correct**: Previous Finance Commissions (Eleventh and Twelfth) had used tax effort as a criterion alongside fiscal discipline[3], and the 15th Finance Commission reintroduced this criterion. The Commission was specifically tasked with examining measurable performance-based incentives for states, which was described as the most detailed and ambitious listing[4] of state functions ever suggested to a Finance Commission[5].
Sources- [1] https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/report-15th-finance-commission-2021-26
- [2] https://prsindia.org/policy/report-summaries/report-15th-finance-commission-2021-26
- [3] https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/15th-FC/reports/studies/Measurable%20performance%20based%20incentives%20for%20States%20in%20India.pdf
- [4] https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/15th-FC/reports/studies/Measurable%20performance%20based%20incentives%20for%20States%20in%20India.pdf
- [5] https://fincomindia.nic.in/asset/doc/commission-reports/15th-FC/reports/studies/Measurable%20performance%20based%20incentives%20for%20States%20in%20India.pdf
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question is a classic 'Wolf in Sheep's Clothing'. It looks like a data-heavy bouncer requiring you to memorize obscure grant figures (₹4,800cr, ₹45,000cr), but it is actually a 'Sitter' designed to be solved by eliminating a single fundamental error in Statement II.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Did the 15th Finance Commission recommend grants of ₹4,800 crore from 2022-23 to 2025-26 to incentivize States to enhance educational outcomes?
- Statement 2: Did the 15th Finance Commission recommend sharing 45% of the net proceeds of Union taxes with States?
- Statement 3: Did the 15th Finance Commission allocate ₹45,000 crore as performance-based incentives for all States for carrying out agricultural reforms?
- Statement 4: Did the 15th Finance Commission reintroduce tax-effort criteria to reward fiscal performance?
Shows the Finance Commission's explicit role to recommend principles and specific grants-in-aid to States.
A student can infer that the FC is empowered to design targeted grants (e.g., for education) and therefore could propose multi-year incentive grants.
Reiterates the FC's remit (distribution of taxes, grants-in-aid, measures to augment state funds and other matters referred by the President).
Use this rule to accept that the 15th FC could include sectoral incentive grants (like for education) in its recommendations.
Identifies the 15th Finance Commission's mandate and the five-year award period (2020–2025), establishing the timeframe within which multi-year grants would be recommended.
A student could check whether a 2022–23 to 2025–26 payment schedule fits within the FC's award timeline and plausible implementation windows.
Provides examples of specific, named grants (post-devolution revenue deficit grants, special grants, nutrition grants) with exact rupee amounts, showing the FC/centre issues targeted grants with quantified allocations.
By analogy, a student could judge that a quantified grant of ₹4,800 crore for education is the sort of specific allocation the Commission or central government might recommend or fund, and then seek the exact schedule.
Describes how the FC recommends revenue-deficit grants over the award period and adjusts coverage over years (example: 2021–22 to 2025–26 changes), illustrating multi-year, state-targeted funding patterns.
A student could use this pattern to expect similar year-by-year phasing for any incentive grant (including education) and thus verify if ₹4,800 crore over 2022–23 to 2025–26 is consistent with known phasing practices.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.