Consider the following statements : I. Anadyr in Siberia and Nome in Alaska are a few kilometers from each other, but when people are waking up and getting set for breakfast in these cities, it would be different days. II. When it is Monday in Anadyr, it is Tuesday in Nome. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Says the taiga/tundra biome stretches from Alaska across Eurasia to Siberia, implying geographic continuity and relative proximity of far-eastern Siberia and western Alaska.

A student could look at a map to locate Anadyr in Chukotka and Nome on the Seward Peninsula and infer they are relatively close across the Bering region, suggesting a cross-Bering distance rather than a transcontinental one.

Mentions shipping/ports on the Arctic seaboard of Eurasia and ability to ship timber and fur from Siberia, implying maritime connections between Arctic Siberia and North America.

Using a world map, a student could note the short sea-crossing distances in the Bering/Arctic areas (e.g., between Siberian and Alaskan ports) to judge that Anadyr–Nome is likely on the order of hundreds — not thousands — of kilometers.

Explains that distance between longitudes decreases toward the poles, a geographic rule relevant when estimating east–west distances at high latitudes like Anadyr/Nome.

A student can combine the rule with the approximate longitudes of Anadyr and Nome (from a map) and compute the smaller km-per-degree longitude at their high latitudes to estimate the great-circle distance.

Describes Arctic tundra distribution occupying northern fringes of Alaska and Siberia, reinforcing that both locations lie in the high-latitude near-Arctic zone.

Knowing both are high-latitude points, a student could use their latitudes on a globe and apply great-circle reasoning (shorter surface distances near the pole for given longitude differences) to estimate separation.