Who among the following rulers in ancient India had assumed the titles 'Mattavilasa', Vichitrachitta' and 'Gunabhara'?

Mentions Mahendravarman I's Mandagappattu inscription and that he made specific claims there — showing he used inscriptions to record royal claims or achievements.

A student could check inscriptions attributed to Mahendravarman I (e.g., Mandagappattu) to see whether such honorifics appear there.

Explains the general practice that Indian kings adopted formal titles and epithets (e.g., maharajadhiraja, parama-bhattaraka) to indicate rank and divine connection.

Use this pattern to treat 'Mattavilasa', 'Vichitrachitta', 'Gunabhara' as plausible royal epithets and search for their occurrence in Pallava-era records.

Gives an example of a ruler (Dandidurga) assuming several grand titles after conquests, illustrating the wider practice of adopting multiple honorifics.

Apply the same reasoning to Mahendravarman I — if he proclaimed victories or achievements, he might also have used multiple titles; verify in contemporary records.

Shows another example (Dharmapala) using several high-sounding titles, reinforcing that regional rulers commonly assumed multiple epithets.

Treat the queried names as candidates for similar epithets in Pallava inscriptions and check epigraphic lists or colophons from the period.

Notes that royal titles often include meaningful morphemes (e.g., 'pati' = lord), indicating titles can be compound, descriptive and culturally patterned.

Analyze the lexical components of 'Mattavilasa', 'Vichitrachitta', 'Gunabhara' (if familiar) and compare with known naming conventions to assess plausibility before checking sources.