With reference to the Government of India, consider the following information : I. Directorate of Enforcement Enforcement of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 It works under Internal Security Division-I, Ministry of Home Affairs II. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Enforces the Provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 It works under Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance III. Directorate General of Systems and Data Management Carrying out big data analytics to assist tax officers for better policy and nabbing tax evaders It works under Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance In how many of the above rows is the information correctly matched?

Mentions the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act (FEOA) 2018 and its purpose (confiscation/recovery of property) without naming an enforcing agency.

A student could consult the FEOA text or official notifications to see which agency is legally empowered to declare and pursue fugitive economic offenders.

States that the CBI investigates 'economic offenses' and serious organized crime, suggesting that economic offences are typically within remit of central enforcement agencies.

Use this pattern to check whether FEOA enforcement is assigned to a central economic/criminal investigation agency like CBI or another central agency (e.g., Directorate of Enforcement).

Explains CBI's role in anti‑corruption and economic crime, showing that central statutory agencies are commonly tasked with investigating economic offences.

Compare the statutory mandate of agencies described here with the enforcement provisions of FEOA to see which agency's statutory functions align.

Describes a 'Directorate' (DGCA) as an attached office of a Ministry that is 'primarily responsible for regulation... and enforcement of' sector-specific regulations.

Apply this general rule: if FEOA designates a 'Directorate' attached to a ministry, check which ministry and whether that directorate is empowered to enforce the Act.

Gives an example of a statutory bureau (WCCB) created to 'complement the efforts' of state enforcers and other agencies, illustrating that Parliament creates specialised enforcement bodies for particular laws.

Use this pattern to look for any statutory creation or notification under FEOA that sets up or assigns enforcement to a specialised agency (which could be the Directorate of Enforcement).

This snippet shows that some central investigation agencies (NIA) work under the administrative control of the Ministry of Home Affairs, illustrating a pattern where certain investigative bodies are placed within MHA.

A student could use this pattern to check MHA’s official organizational chart or Allocation of Business rules to see whether Enforcement-related bodies are listed under an MHA division.

The CBI’s establishment and administrative link to the Ministry of Home Affairs demonstrates that major central investigative agencies can be created/placed under MHA.

One could compare how agencies like CBI are allocated within ministries and then look up where the Directorate of Enforcement is allocated in similar official allocations.

Description of CBI’s composition and superintendence under central authorities again exemplifies the recurring rule: investigative organisations may be under central ministries (including MHA).

Use this as a model to search ministry-level divisions and superintendence entries (e.g., in Annual Reports or Allocation of Business) to locate the Directorate of Enforcement.

This snippet shows the Ministry of Home Affairs is the controlling ministry for IPS and internal security personnel — indicating MHA’s role in internal security administration.

From this, a student could examine whether bodies concerned with internal security or enforcement are typically grouped under MHA divisions such as Internal Security Division‑I.

The Allocation of Business Rules 1961 are cited as assigning nodal roles to MHA for certain functions, highlighting that formal allocation rules determine which ministry houses particular functions/agencies.

A student could consult the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules or the MHA’s Division-wise allocation to verify whether the Directorate of Enforcement appears under Internal Security Division‑I.

States that Basic Customs Duty is imposed under the Customs Act, 1962, establishing that the Act is the statutory source for customs regulation and duties.

A student could use this to infer that a central enforcement body would exist to implement a major central statute like the Customs Act and then check which agency is assigned that role.

Discusses other indirect taxes and central excise/customs matters, showing customs-related taxation is administered at the central level.

A student might combine this with knowledge that central taxes are enforced by central authorities and then look up which central agency handles customs enforcement.

Explains that customs duties are part of central taxation/finance domain, implying enforcement responsibility lies with central government agencies.

One could extend this by checking central government organizational charts or statutory schedules to identify the specific central agency tasked with customs law enforcement.

Describes a pattern where a central investigation agency (NIA) is explicitly empowered to investigate and prosecute offences under Acts listed in its schedule — illustrating the common model of central agencies being given statutory enforcement powers for specified laws.

Using this pattern, a student could look for a similar statutory or administrative instrument that lists the Customs Act among laws entrusted to a particular central enforcement agency (e.g., DRI).

Notes that enforcement authorities coordinate actions towards implementation of the provisions of an Act, showing that Acts are implemented via designated enforcement agencies and coordination mechanisms.

A student can apply this general rule to the Customs Act by searching for which enforcement authority coordinates and enforces customs provisions (suggesting an identifiable agency like DRI might fulfill that role).