Change set
Pick exam & year, then Go.
Question map
'X' was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term 'law' as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. 'X' explained that the meaning of the term 'law' in the Constitution of India was very comprehensive. It included ordinances, very and even rules and regulations, orders out that the term 'law' in Article 13 also included custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law, to which 'X' was not convinced. Based on the above, select the correct conclusion from the options given below:
Explanation
According to Article 13(3)(a) of the Constitution of India, the term 'law' is given a very wide connotation. It explicitly includes any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law.
In the given scenario, 'X' correctly identifies that ordinances, rules, regulations, and orders fall under the definition of law. However, 'X' is incorrect in rejecting the inclusion of custom or usage. 'Y' correctly points out that custom and usage having the force of law are indeed included within the ambit of Article 13. Therefore, on the disputed point regarding customs, only the view of 'Y' is correct.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is an absolute sitter straight from the first few pages of Laxmikanth's Fundamental Rights chapter. UPSC is testing your precision on the exact constitutional definition of 'law'. Missing this means losing out on the most basic, high-yield polity marks.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Differentiates between legislative (ordinary) law and constituent (constitutional amendment) law in the context of Article 13(2).
- Clarifies that constitutional amendments were historically not considered 'law' under the scope of Article 13(2) for the purpose of abridging fundamental rights.
- Establishes the legal boundary for what can be declared void for violating Part III of the Constitution.
- Distinguishes between pre-constitution and post-constitution laws within the framework of Article 13.
- Clarifies that the prohibition on abridging Fundamental Rights applies to the state's law-making powers.
- Explains that only the inconsistent portion of a law is declared void, rather than the entire statute.
- Provides the specific constitutional language 'laws in force' used to define the scope of Article 13(1).
- Establishes that the definition includes all regulations existing in India prior to the Constitution's commencement.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.