UPSC Mains 2017 GS1 Q2 — Modern Indian History
Clarify how mid-eighteenth century India was beset with the spectre of a fragmented polity. (150 words)
Similar Previous Year Questions
No closely related PYQs found in our 11-year corpus — this question explores a relatively unique angle. We only surface matches with substantive topical overlap, not loose adjacency.
Related Prelims MCQs
Build factual foundation — these MCQs cover facts/concepts you'll need for this Mains question.
Source Map — where to read
"• Examine the policies followed by the rulers of the states of Hyderabad, Bengal, and Avadh.• Give a critical appreciation of the character and achievements of Tipu Sultan.• Trace the rise of the Sikhs in the Punjab in the 18th century. • Discuss Rani Bir Singh's administration of the Punjab.• 4. Trace the rise of the Maratha Empire under the first three Peshwas? Why did it fail to survive?• 5. Bring out the main features of Indian economic life in the 18th century…"
"• 1. In the light of recent controversy regarding the use of Electronic Voting Machines (EVM), what are the challenges before the Election Commission of India to ensure the trustworthiness of elections in India? 150 words • 2. Whether National Commission for Scheduled Castes (NCSC) can enforce the implementation of constitutional reservation for the Scheduled Castes in religious minority institutions? Examine. [150 words] elected government of Delhi? Examine. [250 words] 15 • 7. How far do you agree with the view that tribunals curtail the jurisdiction of ordinary courts? In view of the above,…"
"The centuries in discussion in this chapter were not a period of great political stability. With the exception of Kanishka, the invaders in North India did not consolidate their conquests by establishing large, stable empires. Even Kanishka ruled only for a relatively short period, and his empire slowly fell apart after his death. The Tamil region did not have the unifying force of a large empire and was fragmented into relatively small kingdoms and even smaller principalities. Polity and Society in Post-Mauryan Period 85…"
"playing cards and paper money. In medieval Japan, poets and prose writers were regularly published, and books were cheap and abundant. Printing of visual material led to interesting publishing practices. In the late eighteenth century, in the flourishing urban circles at Edo (later to be known as Tokyo), illustrated collections of paintings Belonging to the mid-13th century, printing woodblocks of the Tripitaka Koreana are a Korean collection of Buddhist scriptures. They were engraved on about 80,000 woodblocks. They were inscribed on the UNESCO Memory of the World Register in 2007. Source: ht…"
"• 1. How did Bimbisara extend the territory of Magadhan Empire? • 2. Write a note on Mahapadma Nanda. • 3. What made Alexander the Great to restore the throne of Porus? • 4. What are the features of a centralised state? • 5. Give a brief note on the literary sources for the study of Mauryan state. • 6. In what ways did the invasion of Alexander make a watershed in Indian history?…"
How this topic is evolving
While the 2017 question focused on the historical 'fragmented polity' of the 1750s, the current discourse has shifted toward 'Linguistic Federalism' and the modern challenges of maintaining unity amidst sub-national assertions. The debate has moved from territorial fragmentation to the friction between national homogenization efforts, like the Three-Language Formula in NEP 2020, and the preservation of regional identity in states like Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra.
Unlike the fragmented polity of the mid-eighteenth century, modern India's unity is tested by the dialectic between national standardization and linguistic sub-nationalism. Critically examine this statement in the context of recent resistance to the Three-Language Formula and the reassertion of regional identities. (Answer in 150 words)
Why this framing: State-level resistance to the National Education Policy 2020 and the 'homogenization' of the Three-Language Formula.
Question Decoded — examiner's intent
- Directive verbs
- Clarify
- Scope keywords
- mid-eighteenth century Indiabeset with the spectrefragmented polity
- Implicit sub-parts
- Analysis of the decline of the Mughal central authority post-Aurangzeb (1707) and the resulting power vacuum.
- Categorization of emerging regional powers into successor states, independent kingdoms, and insurgent states.
- Impact of external invasions (Nadir Shah/Ahmad Shah Abdali) and European company interventions on political stability.
- Common pitfalls
- Spending too much time on the 'reasons' for Mughal decline instead of describing the 'state of fragmentation' itself.
- Focusing only on the British East India Company rather than the internal Indian political landscape of 1750.
- Treating the period as one of total 'anarchy' rather than 'polycenric' governance with vibrant regional identities.
- Forgetting to mention the internal court factions and the 'kingmaker' culture that weakened the center.
- Dimensions required
- Political geographyDynastic shiftsExternal vulnerabilitiesMilitary-administrative transitions
- Marks allocation hint
Allocate 30 words to the Mughal decline and the 'hollow crown' concept. Dedicate 80 words to mapping the fragmented entities (Nizams, Marathas, Sikhs, Nawabs). Use the final 40 words to explain how this lack of a pan-India vision invited foreign predatory interests.
How examiners have framed this topic over the years
From specific constitutional mechanics to broad socio-economic consequences of 18th-century transitions and post-independence consolidation processes.
In an earlier 2016 question, the examiner focused on narrow constitutional technicalities and the temporary nature of Article 370. By 2017, the lens shifted toward the mid-eighteenth century's 'fragmented polity' to test political decay; subsequently, in 2022, this same period was revisited through the lens of economic catastrophe and famine causality. The framing evolved further in 2018 and 2019 to emphasize historical reconstruction via external accounts and the intellectual origins of national identity, before a 2025 question widened the scope to a multi-dimensional (polity, economy, education) analysis of post-independence consolidation.
PYQs this pattern was synthesized from
Answer Skeleton — fill this in
Introduction
The mid-eighteenth century (c. 1750) represented a transitional era in Indian history, characterized by the irreversible decline of the Mughal hegemony and the emergence of a multi-polar political landscape. [NCERT Class XII: Themes in Indian History II]
Body
1. Erosion of Centralized Mughal Authority
- Succession Crises: Frequent civil wars among "Later Mughals" following Aurangzeb's death in 1707 undermined imperial stability.
- Institutional Collapse: The breakdown of the Jagirdari and Mansabdari systems led to a financial crunch and administrative paralysis. [Spectrum: A Brief History of Modern India, Ch.3]
- External Shocks: Invasions by Nadir Shah (1739) and Ahmad Shah Abdali shattered the myth of Mughal invincibility.
2. Emergence of Regional Power Centers
- Successor States: Provinces like Bengal (Murshid Quli Khan), Awadh (Saadat Khan), and Hyderabad (Nizam-ul-Mulk) became virtually independent.
- Insurgent States: The rise of the Maratha Confederacy, Sikhs in Punjab, and Jats near Delhi challenged central dictates. [Bipin Chandra: History of Modern India, Ch.1]
- Autonomous Principalities: States like Mysore, Kerala, and the Rajput kingdoms asserted sovereign control.
3. Internecine Conflicts and Foreign Intervention
- Political Vacuum: Constant warfare between the Marathas, Nizams, and Mysoreans prevented a pan-Indian alliance.
- Colonial Opportunism: The Anglo-French rivalry (Carnatic Wars) exploited local dynastic disputes to gain territorial footholds. [Plassey to Partition: Sekhar Bandyopadhyay]
- Battle of Plassey (1757): Symbolized the shift from indigenous fragmentation to the beginning of British political ascendancy.
Conclusion
The mid-eighteenth century was a period of "great anarchy" where the lack of a unified political vision facilitated foreign conquest. This fragmentation transformed India from a manufacturing powerhouse into a colonial hinterland, eventually leading to the consolidation of the British Raj.
Ready to practice?
Take this question, write your own answer in 150 words, and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where you stand.
Open evaluation workspace →