UPSC Mains 2022 GS1 Q3 — Colonial Economic History
Why was there a sudden spurt in famines in colonial India since the mid-eighteenth century? Give reasons. (Answer in 150 words)
Similar Previous Year Questions
No closely related PYQs found in our 11-year corpus — this question explores a relatively unique angle. We only surface matches with substantive topical overlap, not loose adjacency.
Related Prelims MCQs
Build factual foundation — these MCQs cover facts/concepts you'll need for this Mains question.
-
CDS-II 2022 Colonial economic impact
The Bengal Famine of 1769 - 70 was worsened by
-
CDS-II 2010 Colonial economic impact
Which one of the following was not a result of British Colonial rule in India ?
-
CAPF 2018 Colonial economic impact
Which one of the following commercial centres declined after mid-eighteenth century?
-
CDS-I 2022 Peasant and tribal movements
Consider the following statements : 1. In the 19th century, peasants in various parts of India rose in revolt against moneylenders and grain dealers. 2. In May 1875, at village Supa in Poona District in the Bombay Deccan, peasants attacked shopkeepers, burnt the bahi khatas (account books), looted grain shops and set fire to the houses of Sahukars. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Source Map — where to read
"Famine, though no stranger to India, increased in frequency and deadliness with the advent of British colonial rule. Between 1800 and 1825, there were only four famines. But in the last quarter of the century there were 22 famines. It is estimated that over five million died. By 1901, Romesh Chunder Dutt, a former ICS officer and a staunch nationalist, enumerated 10 mass famines since the 1860s, putting the total death toll at 15 million. Effects of British Rule…"
"Regular recurrence of famines became a common feature of daily existence in India. These famines were not just because of foodgrain scarcity, but were a direct result of poverty unleashed by colonial forces in India. Between 1850 and 1900, about 2.8 crore people died in famines.…"
"• 2 . Answer the following questions in about 30 words. • (i) Very hot and dry and very cold and wet regions of India have low density of population. In this light, explain the role of climate on the distribution of population.• (ii) Which states have large rural population in India? Give one reason for such large rural population.• (iii) Why do some states of India have higher rates of work participation than others? (iv) 'The agricultural sector has the largest share of Indian workers.' – Explain. • 3. Answer the following questions in about 150 words. • (i) Discuss the spatial pattern of de…"
"P. over 12 lakhs. Drought led to a country-wide famine in 1896-97 and then again in 1899-1900. The famine of 1896-97 affected over 9.5 crore people of whom the famine of 1899-1900 followed quickly and nearly 45 lakhs died.…"
"• 1. Why was the jotedar a powerful figure in many areas of rural Bengal?• 2. How did zamindars manage to retain control over their zamindaris?• 3. How did the Paharias respond to the coming of outsiders?• 4. Why did the Santhals rebel against British rule?• 5. What explains the anger of the Deccan ryots against…"
How this topic is evolving
The historical analysis of famines as policy-driven caloric scarcity is evolving into a contemporary study of 'resource famines' caused by the collision of technological modernization and ecological limits. This shift is reflected in the transition from simple grain availability to a lifecycle approach, where schemes like PM-PRANAM and 'Mission Poshan' address the 'Triple Crisis' of soil exhaustion and competing water demands from AI infrastructure.
While colonial-era famines were primarily outcomes of administrative neglect and extraction, modern resource vulnerabilities in India are increasingly driven by the conflict between industrial modernization and ecological boundaries. Critically examine how the 'hidden' water demands of digital infrastructure and soil health degradation present new challenges to India’s long-term food security. (Answer in 250 words)
Why this framing: Integration of Natural Farming into PM-PRANAM and the rising water footprint of AI data centers.
Question Decoded — examiner's intent
- Directive verbs
- WhyGive reasons
- Scope keywords
- sudden spurt in faminescolonial Indiamid-eighteenth century
- Implicit sub-parts
- How did the transition from Mughal/Regional rule to EIC rule fundamentally change the agrarian structure?
- What specific fiscal and trade policies exacerbated natural vulnerabilities?
- What was the impact of the shift from food crops to commercial cash crops?
- Why did the traditional community-based relief mechanisms collapse under colonial administration?
- Common pitfalls
- Focusing too much on natural causes like Monsoons rather than the man-made administrative causes required by the prompt.
- Treating the entire colonial period as a monolith instead of focusing on the 'mid-eighteenth century' turning point (Battle of Plassey/Buxar).
- Failing to mention the 'Drain of Wealth' theory and its role in reducing the peasant's buffer stock of grain.
- Neglecting the impact of the 'Laissez-faire' ideology which prevented state intervention in grain markets.
- Dimensions required
- Revenue Administration (Land Revenue Systems)Economic/Trade Policy (Commercialization of Agriculture)Ecological/Infrastructure (Neglect of traditional irrigation)Political Economy (Export of food grains during shortages)Ideological (Malthusian and Laissez-faire theories)
- Marks allocation hint
Devote 30 words to the 1750-1770 transition (e.g., Bengal Famine 1770), 90 words to the core structural reasons (revenue, commercialization, and policy), and 30 words to a concluding summary on the shift from 'natural calamities' to 'policy-induced disasters'.
How examiners have framed this topic over the years
Moving from broad 18th-century political instability to specific critiques of colonial-induced socio-economic disasters like systemic famines.
The examiner’s lens has shifted from structural pre-conditions to direct causal analysis of colonial outcomes. Before 2022, examiners focused on the political vacuum of the mid-eighteenth century (2017) and the policy watersheds following the 1857 Revolt (2016), setting the stage for understanding colonial governance. The 2022 question narrowed this focus to a specific socio-economic tragedy—the spurt in famines—moving away from the broader governance and poverty eradication debates seen in earlier GS3 questions (2017, 2018) to a critique of colonial economic extraction.
PYQs this pattern was synthesized from
Answer Skeleton — fill this in
Introduction
The mid-eighteenth century, starting with the British conquest of Bengal (1757), marked a transition from natural localized scarcities to frequent, large-scale "man-made" famines characterized by extreme mortality. [NCERT Class XII, Themes in Indian History III]
Exploitative Land Revenue Systems
Rigid tax structures and high rates
- Permanent Settlement (1793): Fixed high revenue demands forced peasants to sell food stocks to pay taxes even during crop failures. [Spectrum Modern India, Ch. 16]
- Merciless Collection: Lack of remissions or flexibility during droughts, unlike the practice under pre-colonial rulers.
- Indebtedness: Farmers turned to moneylenders, leading to land alienation and loss of subsistence means.
Commercialization of Agriculture
Shift from food grains to cash crops
- Forced Cultivation: Replacement of rice and millets with Indigo, Opium, and Cotton for the global market. [Bipan Chandra, History of Modern India]
- Market Vulnerability: Peasantry became dependent on volatile international prices rather than local food security.
Economic Drain and De-industrialization
Destruction of traditional livelihoods
- Overcrowding of Agriculture: Ruined artisans and weavers forced into farming, increasing pressure on marginal lands. [NCERT Class XII, Indian Economic Development]
- Lack of Diversification: Absence of alternative industrial employment made the population solely dependent on monsoon-based farming.
Administrative Apathy and Trade Policies
Laissez-faire and export priorities
- Food Exports: Continued export of wheat and rice to Britain even during peak famine years to maintain trade surplus.
- Malthusian Logic: Official reluctance to provide "gratuitous relief" based on the belief that interference in market prices would worsen the economy.
Conclusion
The spurt in famines was a structural byproduct of colonial extraction rather than mere climatic failure. Post-independence, India addressed this through the Green Revolution and the Public Distribution System (PDS) to ensure institutional food security.
Ready to practice?
Take this question, write your own answer in 150 words, and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where you stand.
Open evaluation workspace →