GS2 2017 Q3 10 marks 150 words Simultaneous Elections

UPSC Mains 2017 GS2 Q3 — Simultaneous Elections

"Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people." Discuss. (Answer in 150 words)

Write your answer →

Similar Previous Year Questions

No closely related PYQs found in our 11-year corpus — this question explores a relatively unique angle. We only surface matches with substantive topical overlap, not loose adjacency.

Related Prelims MCQs

Build factual foundation — these MCQs cover facts/concepts you'll need for this Mains question.

Source Map — where to read

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) · World Constitutions · p.796 Polity

". The local self-governance system in India has not proved to be an effective instrument of governance. Critically examine the statement and give your views to improve the situation. [150 words] 10 • 2. Critically examine the Supreme Court's judgement on 'National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014' with reference to appointment of judges of higher judiciary in India. [150 words] 10 • 3. 'Simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State Assemblies will limit the amount of time and money spent in electioneering but it will reduce the government's accountability to the people' Discus…"

Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) · Elections · p.574 Polity

"l ELECTION PROCESSs Time of Elections Elections for the Lok Sabha and every state Legislative Assembly have to take place every five years, unless called earlier. The President can dissolve Lok Sabha and call a General Election before five years is up, if the Government can no longer command the confidence of the Lok Sabha. and if the re is no a lternati ve gove rnment ava ilable to take ove r. Schedule of Elections When the five-year limit is up, or the legislature has been dissolved and new elections have been called, the Election Commission puts into effect the machinery for holding an elec…"

Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) · LEGISLATURE · p.106 Polity

"The Lok Sabha and the State Legislative Assemblies are directly elected by the people. For the purpose of election, the entire country (State, in case of State Legislative Assembly) is divided into territorial constituencies of roughly equal population. One representative is elected from each constituency through universal adult suffrage where the value of vote of every individual would be equal to another. At present there are 543 constituencies. This number has not changed since 1971 census. The Lok Sabha is elected for a period of five years. This is the maximum.…"

Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) · ELECTORAL POLITICS · p.38 Polity

"Can we say that Indian elections are democratic? To answer this question, let us take a look at how elections are held in India. Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabha (Assembly) elections are held regularly after every five years. After five years the term of all the elected representatives comes to an end. The Lok Sabha or Vidhan Sabha stands 'dissolved'. Elections are held in all constituencies at the same time, either on the same day or within a few days. This is called a general election. called a by-election. In this chapter we will focus on general elections.…"

Democratic Politics-I. Political Science-Class IX . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) · ELECTORAL POLITICS · p.45 Polity

"A large amount of money is spent in conducting elections in India. For instance, the government spent about `3,500 crores in conducting Lok Sabha elections in 2014. That works out to about `40 per person on the voters' list. The amount spent by parties and candidates was more than what the government spent. Roughly speaking, the expenditure made by government, parties and candidates was around `30,000 crores or `500 per voter. Some people say that elections are a burden on our country, that our poor country cannot afford to hold elections once every five years. Let us compare this expenditure …"

How this topic is evolving

No related current-affairs trend found for this question yet.

Question Decoded — examiner's intent

Directive verbs
Discuss
Scope keywords
Simultaneous electionLok Sabha and the State Assemblieslimit the amount of time and money spentelectioneeringreduce the government's accountability to the people
Implicit sub-parts
  • Analyze the efficiency gains in terms of financial savings and administrative continuity (Model Code of Conduct impacts).
  • Examine how the 'One Nation, One Election' model potentially dilutes legislative accountability and oversight by the electorate.
  • Evaluate the impact on federalism and the potential overshadowing of regional issues by national narratives.
  • Discuss constitutional hurdles and possible safeguards to maintain accountability if implemented.
Common pitfalls
  • Focusing only on the logistics of implementation rather than the core tension between 'efficiency' and 'accountability'.
  • Ignoring the perspective of State Assemblies and focusing exclusively on the Union perspective.
  • Missing the specific mention of 'electioneering' and failing to explain how frequent cycles impact governance delivery.
  • Providing a one-sided argument for or against instead of a balanced discussion as required by the directive.
Dimensions required
Fiscal/EconomicAdministrativeConstitutional (Articles 83, 85, 172, 174)Federal/PoliticalDemocratic/Accountability
Marks allocation hint

Allocate roughly 40-50 words to the merits of efficiency and resource saving (time/money). Devote the bulk of the answer (70-80 words) to the critical analysis of how accountability is reduced through less frequent voter contact and federal concerns. Use the remaining 20-30 words for a balanced conclusion or constitutional way forward.

How examiners have framed this topic over the years

Transitioned from broad democratic participation to specific electoral reforms, legal technicalities of representation, and the shifting power balance between Executive and Legislature.

Scope Widening Based on 5 cross-year PYQs

Initially, the framing in 2016 focused on the broad, philosophical link between governance effectiveness and citizen participation. In 2017, the examiner narrowed this to a specific reform—Simultaneous Elections—balancing administrative efficiency (time/money) against democratic accountability. Subsequently, the focus shifted from policy debates to technical legalities in 2022 (RPA 1951 election disputes) and institutional structural critiques, such as the 2023 analysis of Article 356's decline and the 2024 examination of Cabinet dominance over Parliamentary Supremacy.

Dimensions tested
Administrative efficiency vs. Democratic accountabilityLegal procedures and grounds for voiding elections (RPA 1951)Federal power dynamics (Article 356 usage)Institutional integrity of parliamentary offices (The Speaker)Executive-Legislative power balance (Cabinet vs. Parliament)
Angles still under-tested
Impact of digital technology and social media on the 'level playing field' of electioneeringThe role of the Election Commission of India in enforcing the Model Code of Conduct during simultaneous cyclesComparative analysis of 'Simultaneous Elections' with other federal democracies like Germany or South Africa
PYQs this pattern was synthesized from

Answer Skeleton — fill this in

Introduction

Simultaneous elections (One Nation, One Election) refers to structuring the Indian electoral cycle so that polling for the Lok Sabha and all State Legislative Assemblies occurs concurrently. This concept aims to restore the cycle prevalent until 1967 [Laxmikanth, Ch. 75].

Efficiency: Savings in Time and Money

Reduction in Election Expenditure

  • Direct Cost: Minimizes the massive financial burden on the exchequer and political parties for repeated logistics and security deployment [NITI Aayog, Discussion Paper 2017].
  • Indirect Cost: Reduces the "black money" circulation associated with frequent electioneering and populist spending.

Governance and Administrative Continuity

  • MCC Impact: Prevents "policy paralysis" caused by the frequent imposition of the Model Code of Conduct, which halts developmental projects [Law Commission, 170th Report].
  • Human Resources: Frees up teachers and administrative staff from recurring election duties, ensuring better delivery of public services.

Accountability and Federal Concerns

Dilution of Public Oversight

  • Feedback Loops: Frequent elections act as a mid-term appraisal, forcing parties to remain responsive to grassroots grievances [NCERT, Politics in India since Independence].
  • National vs. Local: Risk of national issues overshadowing regional aspirations, potentially leading to "voter homogenization" in favor of the dominant national party.

Constitutional and Structural Hurdles

  • Article 83 and 172: Requires amendments regarding the fixed tenure of Houses [Laxmikanth, Ch. 22].
  • Democratic Deficit: Issues regarding the dissolution of assemblies via Article 356 or No-Confidence Motions remain unresolved in a fixed-cycle system.

Conclusion

While simultaneous elections offer significant administrative advantages, they must not come at the cost of federal diversity or democratic responsiveness. A phased implementation or a "two-cycle" approach, as suggested by the Law Commission (2018), may provide a balanced middle ground.

Ready to practice?

Take this question, write your own answer in 150 words, and get an instant, rubric-based evaluation showing where you stand.

Open evaluation workspace →