Which one of the following cases in the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of creamy layer among the backward classes ?

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: 13 (CAPF/2017)

Which one of the following cases in the Supreme Court of India dealt with the issue of ‘creamy layer’ among the backward classes ?

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

CAPF

stats: 

0,72,17,6,72,5,6

keywords: 

{'supreme court': [12, 1, 4, 14], 'backward classes': [0, 0, 1, 0], 'creamy layer': [1, 0, 0, 0], 'punjab': [2, 0, 1, 0], 'cases': [3, 0, 2, 8], 'bombay': [0, 0, 1, 0], 'union': [17, 3, 24, 36], 'sajjan singh': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13], 'madhu limaye': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'ved murti': [0, 0, 0, 1]}

Option 1: K M Nanavati vs. State of Bombay: This case is not related to the issue of `creamy layer` among the backward classes. It involves a criminal trial concerning the murder of Nanavati`s wife`s lover.

Option 2: Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India: This is the correct answer. This case, also known as the Mandal case, dealt with the issue of reservation for backward classes in government jobs. The concept of `creamy layer`, which refers to a section of the backward class that is economically advanced and does not require affirmative action, was discussed in this case.

Option 3: Madhu Limaye vs. Ved Murti: This case is not related to the issue of `creamy layer` among the backward classes. It involves a defamation suit filed by Madhu Limaye against Ved Murti, a politician.

Option 4: Sajjan Singh vs. State of Punjab: This case is not related to the issue of `creamy layer` among the backward classes. It involves a challenge to the validity of the Punjab Alienation of Land Act, 1900.

In conclusion, the correct answer is option 2, Indra Sawhney vs. Union of

Practice this on app