Option 1 suggests that both statements are true and Reason (R) explains Assertion (A). This is incorrect because while both statements are true, R does not explain why willful disobedience or non-compliance of court orders amounts to Contempt of Court.

Option 2, which is the correct answer, states that both A and R are true, but R isn`t the correct explanation of A. Assertion (A) correctly explains what could amount to Contempt of Court. Reason (R) correctly describes why judicial activism requires judiciary with punitive powers. However, R doesn`t explain why a specific behavior, as mentioned in A, amounts to Contempt of Court.

Option 3 suggests that Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is false. This is incorrect as both statements are true.

Option 4 suggests that Assertion (A) is false but Reason (R) is true. This is incorrect as both statements are true.