Consider the following state- ments: 1. The Advocate General of a State in India is appointed by the President of India upon the recommendations of the Governor of the con- cerned State. 2. As provided in the Code of Civil Procedure, High Courts have orig

examrobotsa's picture

Submitted by examrobotsa on

Q: (CDS-II/2019)
Consider the following state- ments:
1. The Advocate General of a State in India is appointed by the President of India upon the recommendations of the Governor of the con- cerned State.
2. As provided in the Code of Civil Procedure, High Courts have original appel- late advisory jurisdiction at the State level.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

question_subject: 

Polity

question_exam: 

CDS-II

stats: 

0,29,45,4,27,19,24

keywords: 

{'late advisory jurisdiction': [0, 0, 0, 1], 'advocate general': [1, 0, 1, 2], 'courts': [1, 0, 0, 0], 'civil procedure': [0, 0, 0, 3], 'state level': [2, 0, 1, 1], 'governor': [5, 1, 0, 6], 'india': [8, 1, 7, 13]}

Explanation:

  1. The Advocate General of a State in India is appointed by the Governor of the concerned State and not by the President of India.
  2. High Courts have original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction at the State level, but this is not provided in the Code of Civil Procedure. It is provided in the Constitution of India.