Question map
Not attempted
Correct
Incorrect
★
Bookmarked
Loading…
Q64
(IAS/1996)
Polity & Governance › Fundamental Rights, DPSP & Fundamental Duties › Fundamental Rights framework
Answer Verified
Consider the following statements : No one can be compelled to sing the National Anthem since I. it will be violative of the Right to freedom of speech and expression. II. it will be violative of the Right to freedom of conscience and practise and propagation of religion. III. there is no legal provision obliging any one to sing the National Anthem. Of these statements
Result
Your answer:
—
·
Correct:
C
Explanation
All three statements are correct. In Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (Supreme Court, 1986) the Court held that forcing pupils to sing the National Anthem, against their conscientious religious beliefs, violated their fundamental rights — freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) and freedom of conscience and the right to practise religion under Article 25(1). The Court explicitly found there was no law or statutory rule compelling anyone to sing the National Anthem and observed that Article 51A(a) is a duty, not a legally enforceable compulsion. The Prevention of Insults to National Honour statute penalizes intentional disruption of anthem-singing, but not mere non-participation by a conscientious objector [1].
Sources
- [1] https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Emmanuel-v.-State-of-Kerala.pdf
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option.
Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
54%
got it right
✓ Thank you! We'll review this.