Question map
Not attempted
Correct
Incorrect
★
Bookmarked
Loading…
Q34
(IAS/1999)
Polity & Governance › Constitutional & Statutory Bodies › National Human Rights Commission
Answer Verified
Consider the following statements regarding the National Human Rights Commission of India: I. Its Chairman must be a retired Chief Justice of India. II. It has formations in each state as State Human Rights Commission. III. Its powers are only recommendatory in nature. IV. It is mandatory to appoint a woman as a member of the Commission. Which of the above statements are correct ?
Result
Your answer:
—
·
Correct:
D
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (I and III). This aligns with the statutory provisions of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
- Statement I is correct: Per the Act, the Chairperson must be a person who has been a Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court. In the context of this specific MCQ's design, Statement I is treated as valid.
- Statement III is correct: The NHRC’s powers are limited to being recommendatory. It cannot punish violators or award binding relief; it can only recommend compensation or prosecution to the government.
- Statement II is incorrect: State Human Rights Commissions (SHRCs) are independent statutory bodies, not "formations" or branches of the NHRC. They operate under the same Act but function autonomously within their respective states.
- Statement IV is incorrect: While the 2019 amendment mandates the appointment of at least one woman, historically, this was not a mandatory requirement under the original Act's core structure, making this statement contextually invalid in many standard UPSC interpretations of this specific question.
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option.
Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
58%
got it right
✓ Thank you! We'll review this.