There are different arguments given in favour of power sharing in a democratic political system. Which one of the following is not one of them ?

Power sharing is a fundamental principle of democracy aimed at ensuring stability and inclusivity. Option 1 is a prudential reason, as power sharing reduces the possibility of conflict between social groups [t4][t5]. Option 2 is valid because it prevents the 'tyranny of the majority,' which can be oppressive for minorities and destabilizing for the nation [c3][t1]. Option 3 represents the moral reason; power sharing is the 'very spirit of democracy,' emphasizing that those affected by policies must be consulted [c3]. However, Option 4 is incorrect as an argument for power sharing. Historically, it was believed that dispersing power would make it impossible to take quick decisions [c2]. While democracy values consultation, the process of power sharing often makes decision-making more deliberative and slower rather than 'speeding it up,' even if it ultimately improves the quality of decisions and national unity.

Sources

1. [1] Democratic Politics-II. Political Science-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 1: Power-sharing > Forms of power-sharing > p. 8
2. [2] Democratic Politics-II. Political Science-Class X . NCERT(Revised ed 2025) > Chapter 1: Power-sharing > Why power sharing is desirable? > p. 6