The most appropriate relationship between the law of the land and liberty is option 2: "If there is no law, there is no liberty." The reasoning for this is that laws are necessary for the functioning of society, and without them, chaos and anarchy can prevail, leading to the violation of individual rights and the restriction of liberty.

Laws provide a framework for individuals to exercise their freedom without encroaching on the rights of others. In a society without laws, there would be no mechanism to prevent one person from infringing upon the freedom of another. This would lead to a breakdown of order, and individuals would have to rely on their own strength to protect themselves and their property, leading to a loss of liberty.

Moreover, the law is a reflection of societal values and beliefs, and as such, it is constantly evolving to reflect changing attitudes and needs. Option 4: "If laws are changed too often, liberty is in danger" highlights the importance of striking a balance between the need for stability and the need for progress. While laws must be flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances, they must also provide a stable framework that allows individuals to exercise their freedom without fear of arbitrary interference.

Option 1: "If there are more laws, there is less liberty" is not necessarily true, as the number of laws is not indicative of the level of restriction on liberty. Rather, it is the content and application of the law that determines the degree of restriction on freedom. Some laws may be necessary to protect individual rights and freedoms, while others may be overly restrictive.

Option 3: "If there is liberty, laws have to be made by the people" is also not a complete picture of the relationship between law and liberty. While it is important that laws are made with input from the people and reflect their values and beliefs, it is also important that the law is applied fairly and impartially to ensure that individual liberties are protected.

In summary, the most appropriate relationship between the law of the land and liberty is that laws are necessary to protect individual rights and freedoms, and without them, there can be no liberty. While laws must be flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances, they must also provide a stable framework that allows individuals to exercise their freedom without fear of arbitrary interference.