Question map
Consider the following pairs : 1. Drought-Prone Area Programme - Ministry of Agriculture 2. Desert Development Programme - Ministry of Environment and Forests 3. National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas - Ministry of Rural Development Which of the above pairs is/are correctly matched?
Explanation
In 2009, three watershed programmes (DPAP, DDP, IWDP) were consolidated under a comprehensive programme called 'Integrated Watershed Management Programme' covered under the Ministry of Rural Development.[1] This indicates that both the Drought-Prone Area Programme (DPAP) and Desert Development Programme (DDP) currently fall under the Ministry of Rural Development, not the Ministry of Agriculture or Ministry of Environment and Forests as stated in pairs 1 and 2.
For the National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas, the Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) is funded by the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development[2], and watershed programmes have been integrated under this ministry's purview. This makes pair 3 correctly matched.
Therefore, only pair 3 is correct, making option B the right answer. Pairs 1 and 2 incorrectly attribute DPAP and DDP to different ministries when they actually belong to the Ministry of Rural Development.
Sources- [1] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Current Status of DPAP > p. 46
- [2] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > Table 6.7 > p. 28
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewA classic 'Ministry Confusion' trap targeting the overlap between Agriculture, Rural Development, and Environment. While standard books (Majid Husain) discuss these schemes under 'Climate' or 'Regional Planning', they often bury the administrative ownership. The key is to distinguish 'Area Development' (Rural Dev) from 'Farming Systems' (Agriculture).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the Drought-Prone Areas Programme administered by the Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India?
- Statement 2: Is the Desert Development Programme administered by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (Government of India)?
- Statement 3: Is the National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas administered by the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India?
- Explicitly states DPAP (and DDP) would be retransferred to the Department of Rural Development, not the Ministry of Agriculture.
- Implies DPAP responsibility lies with rural development bodies rather than the Ministry of Agriculture & Cooperation.
- States the Drought Prone Areas Programme was transferred to 'this department' which became the Ministry of Rural Reconstruction.
- Shows DPAP was managed by a rural development department/ministry rather than the Ministry of Agriculture.
States that in 2009 DPAP (with other watershed programmes) was consolidated under an 'Integrated Watershed Management Programme' covered under the Ministry of Rural Development.
A student could infer that administration shifted away from the Ministry of Agriculture and check timelines or ministry notifications after 2009 to test whether DPAP remained with Agriculture.
Describes DPAP as an integrated area development programme in the agricultural sector launched by the Central government in 1973–74.
A student could use this to hypothesize DPAP may originally have been run by agricultural authorities and then compare with later organisational changes.
Cites the 'Ministry of Agriculture' (alongside Ministry of Environment) as the source for the definition of 'drought prone area', showing Ministry of Agriculture involvement in drought-related policy/definitions.
A student could treat this as evidence of Agriculture Ministry involvement in drought matters and then look for administrative responsibility for specific programmes like DPAP.
Notes DPAP was one of several programmes brought together under the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) in 1978–79, indicating DPAP has been administratively reorganised into broader schemes.
A student could use this pattern of reorganising programmes to suspect DPAP's administrative home may have changed over time and verify which ministry oversaw later consolidated schemes.
Lists 'Effective implementation of Drought-Prone Area Programmes (DPAP)' among broader drought-mitigation steps, linking DPAP to multi-sectoral responses rather than a single ministry's domain.
A student could infer DPAP implementation may involve multiple ministries and therefore verify official ownership rather than assume it is solely with Agriculture.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.