Question map
Consider the following pairs : 1. Drought-Prone Area Programme - Ministry of Agriculture 2. Desert Development Programme - Ministry of Environment and Forests 3. National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas - Ministry of Rural Development Which of the above pairs is/are correctly matched?
Explanation
In 2009, three watershed programmes (DPAP, DDP, IWDP) were consolidated under a comprehensive programme called 'Integrated Watershed Management Programme' covered under the Ministry of Rural Development.[1] This indicates that both the Drought-Prone Area Programme (DPAP) and Desert Development Programme (DDP) currently fall under the Ministry of Rural Development, not the Ministry of Agriculture or Ministry of Environment and Forests as stated in pairs 1 and 2.
For the National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas, the Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (IWDP) is funded by the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development[2], and watershed programmes have been integrated under this ministry's purview. This makes pair 3 correctly matched.
Therefore, only pair 3 is correct, making option B the right answer. Pairs 1 and 2 incorrectly attribute DPAP and DDP to different ministries when they actually belong to the Ministry of Rural Development.
Sources- [1] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Current Status of DPAP > p. 46
- [2] Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > Table 6.7 > p. 28
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewA classic 'Ministry Confusion' trap targeting the overlap between Agriculture, Rural Development, and Environment. While standard books (Majid Husain) discuss these schemes under 'Climate' or 'Regional Planning', they often bury the administrative ownership. The key is to distinguish 'Area Development' (Rural Dev) from 'Farming Systems' (Agriculture).
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Is the Drought-Prone Areas Programme administered by the Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India?
- Statement 2: Is the Desert Development Programme administered by the Ministry of Environment and Forests (Government of India)?
- Statement 3: Is the National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas administered by the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India?
- Explicitly states DPAP (and DDP) would be retransferred to the Department of Rural Development, not the Ministry of Agriculture.
- Implies DPAP responsibility lies with rural development bodies rather than the Ministry of Agriculture & Cooperation.
- States the Drought Prone Areas Programme was transferred to 'this department' which became the Ministry of Rural Reconstruction.
- Shows DPAP was managed by a rural development department/ministry rather than the Ministry of Agriculture.
States that in 2009 DPAP (with other watershed programmes) was consolidated under an 'Integrated Watershed Management Programme' covered under the Ministry of Rural Development.
A student could infer that administration shifted away from the Ministry of Agriculture and check timelines or ministry notifications after 2009 to test whether DPAP remained with Agriculture.
Describes DPAP as an integrated area development programme in the agricultural sector launched by the Central government in 1973–74.
A student could use this to hypothesize DPAP may originally have been run by agricultural authorities and then compare with later organisational changes.
Cites the 'Ministry of Agriculture' (alongside Ministry of Environment) as the source for the definition of 'drought prone area', showing Ministry of Agriculture involvement in drought-related policy/definitions.
A student could treat this as evidence of Agriculture Ministry involvement in drought matters and then look for administrative responsibility for specific programmes like DPAP.
Notes DPAP was one of several programmes brought together under the Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP) in 1978–79, indicating DPAP has been administratively reorganised into broader schemes.
A student could use this pattern of reorganising programmes to suspect DPAP's administrative home may have changed over time and verify which ministry oversaw later consolidated schemes.
Lists 'Effective implementation of Drought-Prone Area Programmes (DPAP)' among broader drought-mitigation steps, linking DPAP to multi-sectoral responses rather than a single ministry's domain.
A student could infer DPAP implementation may involve multiple ministries and therefore verify official ownership rather than assume it is solely with Agriculture.
- Explicitly discusses administrative placement of DPAP and DDP, recommending retransferring DPAP and DDP to the Department of Rural Development.
- Distinguishes Wastelands Development (to be with Ministry of Environment and Forests) from DDP, implying DDP is not administered by MoEF.
- Discusses possible placements for 'this department' and contrasts making it part of Ministry of Agriculture vs. Ministry of Environment and Forests.
- The conditional language ('could be') indicates the programmes (including DDP) were not necessarily under MoEF at the time.
- States the National Wastelands Development Board was established under the Ministry of Environment and Forests, separately identifying wastelands work from DPAP/DDP.
- This separation supports the view that DDP was not administered by MoEF in the same way as wastelands programmes.
Lists the Desert Development Programme among many national programmes addressing desertification and land degradation, implying it is a centrally recognised scheme.
A student could check which central ministries typically host nationally recognised land/degradation programmes to see likely administrators.
Shows that a closely related scheme (Integrated Wasteland/Watershed programmes) is funded by the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development, illustrating that land/watershed schemes are sometimes administered outside MoEF.
Compare administrative homes of analogous programmes (IWDP/IWMP) to assess whether DDP is more likely under Rural Development/Agriculture or MoEF.
Describes DDP funding pattern (centrally sponsored 75:25 and transfers to Watershed Committee/Gram Panchayats), a structure common to centrally sponsored programmes across several ministries.
Use the funding/implementation pattern to look up which central ministry typically manages centrally sponsored 75:25 watershed/desert schemes.
Gives the launch date (1977–78) and notes shift to watershed-based implementation, indicating institutional history that might reveal which ministry oversaw it historically.
Trace historical administrative responsibility for the scheme from its launch year to see whether it has been under MoEF or another ministry.
Cites an Annual Report of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as a source for related material, suggesting MoEF publishes information on desertification programmes.
Check MoEF annual reports (or similar reports listed) to see whether they describe administrative responsibility for DDP.
- Explicitly states that three watershed programmes were consolidated under an Integrated Watershed Management Programme 'covered under the Ministry of Rural Development'.
- Shows that watershed programmes at national level fall under the administrative ambit of the Ministry of Rural Development.
- Identifies the Integrated Wasteland Development Programme (a watershed-related scheme) as funded by the Department of Land Resources, Ministry of Rural Development.
- Supports the pattern that central watershed/wasteland schemes are administered through Ministry of Rural Development structures.
- Mentions the National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas (NWDPRA) by name, confirming it is a national watershed project.
- Says the project has been subsumed (implying incorporation into broader/central watershed arrangements) consistent with consolidation under MoRD.
- [THE VERDICT]: Trap. Standard books list the schemes but the 'Ministry' column is often ignored by aspirants who assume 'Drought' = Agriculture.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Dryland Farming & Watershed Management. The administrative split between Dept of Land Resources (MoRD) and Dept of Agriculture (MoA).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Watershed Split': 1. MoRD (Dept Land Resources): DPAP, DDP, IWDP (now WDC-PMKSY). 2. MoA (Dept Ag): NWDPRA, RAD (Rainfed Area Development). 3. MoEFCC: NAP (National Afforestation Programme). 4. Jal Shakti: CADWM (Command Area Development).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Use a 'Functional Heuristic' rather than rote memorization. If the scheme targets 'Backward Area/Poverty' (Drought/Desert), it falls under Rural Development. If it targets 'Crop Productivity/Farming Method' (Rainfed), it falls under Agriculture.
Reference [3] states DPAP was consolidated into an Integrated Watershed Management Programme covered under the Ministry of Rural Development, which is directly relevant to which ministry administers DPAP.
UPSC often asks which ministry or department administers major flagship/area programmes; knowing restructurings (e.g., consolidation under Rural Development) prevents misattributing programmes to older or related ministries. Learn by mapping programme histories and recent consolidations; cross-check current ministry custodianship in official scheme descriptions.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Current Status of DPAP > p. 46
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) > p. 45
References [2] and [5] cite the Ministry of Agriculture (and Ministry of Environment) as authorities defining 'drought-prone area', showing ministry involvement in technical definitions distinct from scheme administration.
Questions may differentiate between technical/definitional roles (which ministry defines criteria) and administrative roles (which ministry runs a scheme). Mastering this distinction helps answer linked questions on policy versus administration. Study source documents where ministries issue definitions/guidelines versus those that implement programmes.
- Environment and Ecology, Majid Hussain (Access publishing 3rd ed.) > Chapter 8: Natural Hazards and Disaster Management > Drought hazards > p. 65
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > DROUGHTS > p. 42
Reference [1] gives DPAP's launch year, scope, and objectives—useful background when assessing which ministry logically would have overseen the programme historically.
Exam questions often require knowing when and why programmes were launched and their sectoral focus to infer administrative linkages or policy intent. Memorise launch timelines, stated objectives, and sectoral domain to link programmes to likely implementing ministries and subsequent reorganisations.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Drought Prone Area Programme (DPAP) > p. 45
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Current Status of DPAP > p. 46
Several references describe the DDP's aims (checking desertification, raising productivity) and specific strategies adopted under the programme.
DDP-level objectives and strategies are frequently asked in environment and geography sections; mastering them helps answer questions on desertification mitigation, rural livelihoods interventions, and linked schemes. Study the launch timeline, stated aims, and listed interventions for concise answers and comparisons with other anti-desertification programmes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Desertification and Desert Development Programme > p. 51
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Strategies for Development > p. 52
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Desertification and Desert Development Programme > p. 50
The evidence shows specific Centre–state funding shares and the channeling of funds to local bodies (Watershed Committee/Gram Panchayats) for programme implementation.
Understanding funding modalities (e.g., 100% sponsored; 75:25 Centre–state in hot arid areas; funds to panchayats) is high-yield for UPSC questions on scheme design, federal role, and grassroots implementation. Practice by comparing funding/implementation across schemes and noting administrative accountability.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Desertification and Desert Development Programme > p. 51
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > Table 6.7 > p. 28
One reference explicitly states that the implementation basis for DDP and related programmes was shifted from sectoral to watershed from April 1995.
The watershed approach is a recurrent theme in questions on land degradation, watershed management and integrated rural development. Aspirants should link policy shifts (sectoral → watershed), rationale, and outcomes; prepare by mapping timelines and programme-level changes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 15: Regional Development and Planning > Desertification and Desert Development Programme > p. 50
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > Table 6.7 > p. 28
The references show watershed schemes (e.g., consolidated IWMP) are covered by the Ministry of Rural Development, which directly bears on whether NWDPRA would be administered by that ministry.
High-yield for UPSC: questions frequently ask which ministry/dept administers major rural/environmental schemes. Understanding which ministry oversees watershed and wasteland programmes helps answer queries on policy ownership, funding, and implementation chains. Learn by mapping schemes to ministries and noting consolidations across Five-Year Plans and guideline changes.
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 4: Climate of India > Current Status of DPAP > p. 46
- Geography of India ,Majid Husain, (McGrawHill 9th ed.) > Chapter 6: Soils > Table 6.7 > p. 28
The 'Successor' Scheme: DPAP, DDP, and IWDP were consolidated into the Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in 2009, which is now the 'Watershed Development Component' of PMKSY. Expect a question on the components of PMKSY and their respective ministries.
Apply the 'Mandate Logic':
1. 'Development Programme' for backward regions (Desert/Drought) is a poverty alleviation tool -> Ministry of Rural Development.
2. 'Rainfed Areas' refers to a farming system -> Ministry of Agriculture.
3. Ministry of Environment focuses on 'Conservation', not 'Area Development'.
This logic eliminates all three pairs immediately.
Mains GS-3 (Irrigation/Agriculture): Use these schemes to discuss the evolution from 'Fragmented Approach' to 'Convergence' (PMKSY). Citing the shift from DPAP to PMKSY shows depth in understanding policy evolution.