Consider the following statements : 1. 'Bijak' is a composition of the teachings of Saint Dadu Dayal. 2. The Philosophy of Pushti Marg was propounded by Madhvacharya. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Mentions the 'Kabir Bijak' as a named compilation preserved by a specific sect (Kabirpanth) and distinguishes it from other compilations (Kabir Granthavali associated with Dadupanth).

A student could use this pattern (Bijak as a named compilation linked to a particular saint/sect) plus knowledge of which sect preserves texts to check whether a 'Bijak' is associated with Dadu Dayal or his sect (Dadupanth).

States that compositions of poet-saints were often compiled by disciples or devotees, generally after the saint's death.

Combine this rule with historical info on Dadu Dayal and his followers to see if his teachings were compiled posthumously into a work titled 'Bijak'.

Shows the precedent that the sayings of various bhakti poets and saints were collected into authoritative compilations (e.g., sayings of Namdev, Kabir in Guru Granth Sahib).

Use this general precedent to justify checking whether Dadu Dayal's teachings were similarly collected into a named compendium like a 'Bijak'.

Describes how poet-saints' compositions were compiled and integrated into ritual and textual traditions (e.g., sung, compiled, preserved at shrines).

A student could investigate whether Dadu Dayal's verses were compiled into a text used by his followers in liturgy or preserved by his sect under the title 'Bijak'.

States that Chaitanya belonged to the philosophical school of Madhavacharya and explicitly identifies Madhavacharya as a chief advocate of the Dvaita (dualism) school.

A student could use this to check whether Pushti Marg is described elsewhere as Dvaita or as a separate school (if Pushti Marg is not Dvaita, it likely was not propounded by Madhvacharya).

Contains a multiple‑choice item listing Madhavacharya and 'Pushti marga' as distinct options for 'philosophical school of' — implying they are considered separate named schools in the same pedagogical context.

A student could infer that Pushti Marga is treated as a distinct philosophical/sectarian label and therefore check whether that label maps to Madhvacharya or to a different founder.

Explains that the bhakti movement produced several Vaishnava scholars who expounded distinct philosophies (e.g., Ramanuja's Vishistadvaita vs. Sankara's Advaita).

A student could use the pattern—different bhakti leaders founding distinct schools—to hypothesize that Pushti Marg may have its own founder rather than being Madhvacharya's doctrine.

Describes the bhakti movement producing many sects and doctrines, indicating multiple distinct devotional paths arose historically.

A student could treat Pushti Marg as one such devotional path and investigate whether historical patterns attribute its doctrine to Madhvacharya or to another teacher.