Consider the following pairs : Community sometimes mentioned in the news 1. Kurd : Bangladesh 2. Madhesi : Nepal 3. Rohingya : Myanmar Which of the pairs given above is/are correctly matched?

Shows Kurds are an identifiable ethno-national group active across multiple countries (Turkey, Iraq) — i.e., 'Kurd' can denote a transnational community.

A student could use this pattern to ask whether a Kurdish transnational/diaspora presence extends to South Asian states like Bangladesh by checking diaspora/refugee data or immigration links.

Gives a broad definition/pattern of 'community' (people of a particular religion, region, common work or interest) and examples, implying ethnic groups count as communities.

One could therefore treat 'Kurds' as a potential community in any country if there is a resident/immigrant Kurdish population documented there.

Explains community as a connected group that may share practices and resources, reinforcing that 'community' need not be territorially bounded.

A student could look for local social practices, associations, places of worship, or cultural events in Bangladesh that indicate a Kurdish community presence.

Describes refugees and how conflicts produce refugee communities mapped against conflicts, suggesting refugee or migrant groups can form communities in new countries.

A student might check UNHCR or refugee maps/records to see if Kurdish refugees have settled in Bangladesh, as a route to establish a Kurdish community there.

Discusses migration creating 'outsider' groups and local perceptions of migrants from Bangladesh into India, illustrating how migration flows can create identifiable communities across borders.

By analogy, a student could investigate historical or recent migration routes to see whether Kurds have migrated to Bangladesh and formed a community.

Gives a clear rule that a 'community' can be defined by region or locality (e.g., 'Mumbai's Parsi community'), which is the same type of label 'Madhesi' would be if it denotes a regional group.

A student could apply this pattern by checking whether 'Madhesi' is used as a regional or locality-based identifier in Nepalese contexts (news, maps, ethnographic lists).

Defines community as groups connected by shared activities, resources or social ties, suggesting that ethnolinguistic or regional groups in a country can constitute 'communities'.

Use this definition to ask whether Madhesi share region-based practices, festivals, or resource arrangements in Nepal (evidence from reporting or demographic sources).

Notes that South Asian countries, including Nepal and Bhutan, have experienced migration and disputes involving 'ethnic Nepalese', implying the presence of identifiable ethnic/regional groups within and around Nepal.

Combine this with a map of the region or news reports to see if 'Madhesi' is referenced as one such ethnic/regional group in southern Nepal or in cross-border contexts.

Discusses internal perceptions in Nepal about ethnic groups and cross-border issues, indicating that Nepalese society contains distinct groups whose names appear in political and social discussions.

A student could survey Nepalese news or political discourse for group labels (like 'Madhesi') used in debates over representation, borders, or migration.

Provides an example of how historical/linguistic terms have been used to label migrant or non-mainstream groups, showing that labels for communities can denote social/linguistic difference rather than formal administrative status.

Use this pattern to interpret whether the term 'Madhesi' functions as a social/ethnic label in sources (news, history) even if not an official administrative category.