Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect Bookmarked
Loading…
Q12 (IAS/2018) Polity & Governance › Governance, Policies & Social Justice › Rights-based legislations Official Key

Consider the following statements : 1. Aadhaar card can be used as a proof of citizenship or domicile. 2. Once issued, Aadhaar number cannot be deactivated or omitted by the Issuing Authority. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

Result
Your answer:  ·  Correct: D
Explanation

The correct answer is option D – neither statement 1 nor 2 is correct.

**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The Unique Identification Authority of India was established as a central government agency with the objective of collecting the biometric and demographic data of residents, storing them in a centralised database, and issuing a 12-digit unique identity number called Aadhaar to each resident.[1] Aadhaar is explicitly a proof of residence and identity, not citizenship or domicile. The term "resident" is key here – it does not establish citizenship status or domicile rights under Indian law.

**Statement 2 is incorrect:** UIDAI deactivates the Aadhaar number of the deceased person based on validation and matching of death registration details with the database of death registering authority and Aadhaar database.[2] This clearly demonstrates that the issuing authority can indeed deactivate Aadhaar numbers. Additionally, Deactivation is temporary and cancellation is permanent. Your Aadhaar number still exists in UIDAI's database.[3] This shows that both deactivation and cancellation mechanisms exist, contrary to what statement 2 claims.

Therefore, both statements are incorrect, making option D the correct answer.

Sources
  1. [1] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Disbanding Planning Commission and Setting up NITI Aayog > p. 780
How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
43%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. Consider the following statements : 1. Aadhaar card can be used as a proof of citizenship or domicile. 2. Once issued, Aadhaar number c…
At a glance
Origin: Books + Current Affairs Fairness: Low / Borderline fairness Books / CA: 3.3/10 · 6.7/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

This question rewards 'Wallet Awareness' over bookish knowledge. Statement 1 is literally printed on the Aadhaar card itself. Statement 2 tests the 'Administrative Logic' that no government issuance is ever truly irrevocable. It is a classic example of UPSC punishing absolutist statements in governance topics.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
Can an Aadhaar card be used as proof of Indian citizenship under Indian law (Aadhaar/UIDAI)?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Disbanding Planning Commission and Setting up NITI Aayog > p. 780
Presence: 5/5
“moving unbanked Indians towards organised finance were thus taken. Criticism that privacy and security are affected need to be addressed, but the advantages of the poor getting access to modern finance cannot be denied. A tool for identity mapping that was launched by the UPA in January 2009, Aadhaar was strengthened and institutionalised by the new government. The Unique Identification Authority of India was established as a central government agency with the objective of collecting the biometric and demographic data of residents, storing them in a centralised database, and issuing a 12-digit unique identity number called Aadhaar to each resident.”
Why this source?
  • Explicitly describes Aadhaar/UIDAI as issuing a unique identity number to each 'resident', not to 'citizens'.
  • Frames Aadhaar as an identity/biometric database and mapping tool for residents, implying its basis is residency rather than citizenship.
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 90: Landmark Judgements and Their Impact > K.S. PUTTASWAMY CASE (2017) > p. 641
Presence: 4/5
“In both the cases, the Supreme Court had held that the right to privacy is not protected by the Constitution. This judgement also clarified that the various judgements subsequent to Kharak Singh, which have recognized the fundamental right to privacy, lay down the correct position of law. Young Lawyers Association case<sup>26</sup>(2018), Joseph Shine case<sup>27</sup> (2018), Navtej Singh Johar case<sup>28</sup> (2018) and other cases. Based on this judgement, the Supreme Court delivered (in 2018) a separate judgement on the validity of Aadhaar law. This judgement is popularly known as the Aadhaar judgement or Puttaswamy-II judgement. In this judgement, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016”
Why this source?
  • Refers to the Aadhaar Act and its upheld validity in the context of targeted delivery of financial and other subsidies, benefits and services — a functional purpose rather than conferring citizenship.
  • Shows judicial treatment of Aadhaar as a statutory scheme for benefits/identification, not as a mechanism to determine citizenship.
Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

IAS · 2020 · Q91 Relevance score: 3.77

Consider the following statements : 1. Aadhaar metadata cannot be stored for more than three months. 2. State cannot enter into any contract with private corporations for sharing of Aadhaar data. 3. Aadhaar is mandatory for obtaining insurance products. 4. Aadhaar is mandatory for getting benefits funded out of the Consolidated Fund of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

IAS · 2021 · Q69 Relevance score: 3.05

With reference to India, consider the following statements : 1. There is only one citizenship and one domicile. 2. A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State. 3. A foreigner once granted the citizenship cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

CDS-I · 2016 · Q81 Relevance score: 2.16

Which of the following statements with regard to UID / Aadhar Card are correct? 1. It is a 12 digit unique form of identification for all residents of India 2. It is an identity number along with the biometric information of the individuals 3. It is a national identity and citizenship card Select the correct answer using the code given below:

IAS · 2005 · Q145 Relevance score: 1.93

Consider the following statements : 1. Articles 371 A to 371 I were inserted in the Constitution of India to meet regional demands of Nagaland, Assam, Manipur, Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh and Goa. 2. Constitutions of India and the United States of America envisage a dual policy (The Union and the States) but a single citizenship. 3. A naturalized citizen of India can never be deprived of his citizenship. Which of the above statements is/are correct?