Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. Aadhaar card can be used as a proof of citizenship or domicile. 2. Once issued, Aadhaar number cannot be deactivated or omitted by the Issuing Authority. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is option D – neither statement 1 nor 2 is correct.
**Statement 1 is incorrect:** The Unique Identification Authority of India was established as a central government agency with the objective of collecting the biometric and demographic data of residents, storing them in a centralised database, and issuing a 12-digit unique identity number called Aadhaar to each resident.[1] Aadhaar is explicitly a proof of residence and identity, not citizenship or domicile. The term "resident" is key here – it does not establish citizenship status or domicile rights under Indian law.
**Statement 2 is incorrect:** UIDAI deactivates the Aadhaar number of the deceased person based on validation and matching of death registration details with the database of death registering authority and Aadhaar database.[2] This clearly demonstrates that the issuing authority can indeed deactivate Aadhaar numbers. Additionally, Deactivation is temporary and cancellation is permanent. Your Aadhaar number still exists in UIDAI's database.[3] This shows that both deactivation and cancellation mechanisms exist, contrary to what statement 2 claims.
Therefore, both statements are incorrect, making option D the correct answer.
Sources- [1] Rajiv Ahir. A Brief History of Modern India (2019 ed.). SPECTRUM. > Chapter 39: After Nehru... > Disbanding Planning Commission and Setting up NITI Aayog > p. 780
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis question rewards 'Wallet Awareness' over bookish knowledge. Statement 1 is literally printed on the Aadhaar card itself. Statement 2 tests the 'Administrative Logic' that no government issuance is ever truly irrevocable. It is a classic example of UPSC punishing absolutist statements in governance topics.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Can an Aadhaar card be used as proof of Indian citizenship under Indian law (Aadhaar/UIDAI)?
- Statement 2: Can an Aadhaar card be used as proof of domicile under Indian law (Aadhaar/UIDAI)?
- Statement 3: Can the issuing authority (UIDAI) deactivate, cancel, or revoke an Aadhaar number after it has been issued?
- Explicitly describes Aadhaar/UIDAI as issuing a unique identity number to each 'resident', not to 'citizens'.
- Frames Aadhaar as an identity/biometric database and mapping tool for residents, implying its basis is residency rather than citizenship.
- Refers to the Aadhaar Act and its upheld validity in the context of targeted delivery of financial and other subsidies, benefits and services — a functional purpose rather than conferring citizenship.
- Shows judicial treatment of Aadhaar as a statutory scheme for benefits/identification, not as a mechanism to determine citizenship.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.