Question map
Why is there a great concern about the 'microbeads' that are released into environment?
Explanation
The correct answer is option A because microbeads are a danger to the environment, especially the oceans because they do not easily degrade and are often washed into the sea[1]. They can cause physical and mechanical harm (e.g., cause abnormalities in internal organs) to marine organisms when they mistakenly ingest microplastics[2]. Additionally, as microplastics exist in micro-level to nano-level sizes, they are virtually impossible to remove once released into the environment[3], making them a persistent threat to marine ecosystems.
Option B is incorrect as there is no evidence in the sources linking microbeads to skin cancer in children. Option C, while microplastics can be absorbed by crops grown using soil or fertilizers that have microplastics in them[4], this is not the primary concern specifically about microbeads. Option D is incorrect as the sources do not mention microbeads being used as food adulterants; rather, humans consume fish that may be contaminated with microbeads[1], which is an indirect exposure pathway, not food adulteration.
Sources- [2] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10151227/
- [3] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10151227/
- [4] https://iee.psu.edu/news/blog/microplastics-sources-health-risks-and-how-protect-yourself
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Buzzword Awareness' question. Microbeads were heavily debated in 2016-2018 due to bans in cosmetics (USA, UK, and proposed in India). While standard books cover 'Marine Pollution', the specific term 'microbeads' and their mechanism (passing through filtration systems) was purely a Current Affairs topic found in DownToEarth and The Hindu.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are microbeads released into the environment harmful to marine ecosystems?
- Statement 2: Do microbeads released into the environment cause skin cancer in children?
- Statement 3: Can microbeads released into the environment be absorbed by crop plants in irrigated fields?
- Statement 4: Are microbeads released into the environment often found to be used as food adulterants?
- Explains microplastics are persistent and virtually impossible to remove once released, increasing long-term exposure.
- States microplastics pose hazards to humans and the environment and can cause physical/mechanical harm to marine organisms when ingested.
- Identifies ecotoxicity sources (polymers, monomers, additives, impurities) that can harm marine life.
- Describes chemical pathways by which microplastics are harmful: they can leach toxic chemicals as they break down.
- Notes microplastics can absorb other toxic substances, which can then be transported into environments, increasing ecological risk.
- Frames marine plastic pollution as having far-reaching ecological impacts on marine ecosystems.
- Provides an estimate of economic damage to marine ecosystems from plastics, indicating significant harmful effects.
Explicitly states that plastic pollution can interfere with plankton and other organisms that form the base of the marine food web.
A student could infer microbeads (a form of plastic) might similarly be ingested or physically interfere with plankton, propagating effects up the food web.
Notes that petroleum releases are particularly harmful to seabirds, zooplanktons, and microorganisms, showing that small-scale pollutants affect a range of marine life.
By analogy, a student could test whether micro-sized plastic beads similarly impact zooplankton and microorganisms through ingestion or surface interactions.
Lists general toxic and ecological effects in aquatic systems (toxin release, oxygen depletion, fish kills, loss of coral reefs).
A student could investigate whether microbeads contribute to these pathways (e.g., carrying toxins, shading affecting oxygen/primary production) to evaluate harm.
Describes marine ecosystem zones (pelagic, benthic, plankton presence) and that plankton are central in pelagic zones.
Using this, one could predict where microbeads accumulate (surface/pelagic vs. benthic) and which organisms (plankton, nekton, benthos) are most likely exposed.
Explains that pollutant impacts vary with proximity to shore, currents, season and community composition—showing pollutant effects depend on environmental context.
A student could use this pattern to assess microbead risk by combining knowledge of local currents, shorelines and sensitive habitats to judge likely harm.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.