Question map
With reference to the religious history of India, consider the following statements : 1. Sthaviravadins belong to Mahayana Buddhism. 2. Lokottaravadin sect was an offshoot of Mahasanghika sect of Buddhism. 3. The deification of Buddha by Mahasanghikas fostered the Mahayana Buddhism. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (2 and 3 only). This is based on the early evolution of Buddhist schools and the transition from early sects to Mahayana.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: The Sthaviravadins (believers in the teachings of the elders) were the precursors to the Theravada tradition. They represented the orthodox, conservative branch that rejected innovations, placing them in contrast to the Mahayana tradition.
- Statement 2 is correct: The Lokottaravadin sect was indeed a sub-school or offshoot of the Mahasanghikas. They were known for their "supramundane" (Lokottara) view of the Buddha, asserting that the Buddhaโs physical body was merely a manifestation and his nature was transcendental.
- Statement 3 is correct: The Mahasanghikas pioneered the deification of the Buddha, shifting the focus from a human teacher to a divine entity. This transcendental perspective and the emphasis on the Bodhisattva path directly fostered the rise of Mahayana Buddhism.
Thus, statements 2 and 3 accurately reflect the historical development of Buddhist philosophy, while statement 1 incorrectly categorizes an orthodox sect.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question tests the 'Transition Phase' of Buddhism (2nd Century BC to 1st Century AD). Statement 1 is the elimination key found in standard NCERTs (Sthavira = Thera = Orthodox). Statement 2 is a 'bouncer' detail found in specialized history (A.L. Basham/Upinder Singh), but logical inference connects 'Lokottara' (Supramundane) to the Mahasanghika ideology of deifying the Buddha.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: In the religious history of India, did the Sthaviravadins belong to Mahayana Buddhism?
- Statement 2: In the religious history of India, was the Lokottaravadin sect an offshoot of the Mahasanghika sect of Buddhism?
- Statement 3: In the religious history of India, did the Mahasanghika sect deify the Buddha (portray the Buddha as supramundane)?
- Statement 4: In the religious history of India, did the deification of the Buddha by the Mahasanghikas foster the development of Mahayana Buddhism?
- Explicitly identifies the Sthaviravadins (Theravadins) as a group opposed to doctrinal change, emphasizing arahantship โ a position distinct from Mahayana goals.
- Describes Sthaviravadins as following the original teaching agreed at the first Council, implying they were part of Nikaya/Hinayana tradition rather than Mahayana.
- Distinguishes Mahasanghikas (whose views foreshadowed Mahayana) from other schools and notes the Sthaviravadins as a separate grouping with their own subdivisions.
- States a subdivision within the Sthaviravadins (the Sarvastivadins) broke away โ indicating Sthaviravadins were not themselves Mahayana but part of early sectarian (Nikaya) Buddhism.
- Notes that Mahasanghika views were close to Mahayana and that Sarvastivadins (an offshoot related to Sthaviravadins) also made contributions to Mahayanaโimplying Mahayana chiefly arose from other lineages, not from the Sthaviravadins as a whole.
- Distinguishes doctrinal sources and institutional ties between Mahasanghika, Sarvastivadin, and Mahayana, rather than equating Sthaviravadins with Mahayana.
Lists Mahasanghikas, Sthaviravadins and Sarvastivadins as major sects and states Mahayana emerged from new ideas among Mahasanghikas and Sarvastivadins.
A student could infer that because Mahayana is tied to Mahasanghikas and Sarvastivadins, Sthaviravadins were less likely to be originators or core proponents of Mahayana and might instead be associated with the nonโMahayana side.
Explains that supporters of Mahayana called others 'Hinayana' and that older tradition followers described themselves as theravadins (those following the path of the theras).
A student could map Sthaviravadin linguistically/ideologically to 'sthavira' (elder) / 'thera' (elder) traditions and thus suspect Sthaviravadins belonged to the older/Hinayana tradition rather than Mahayana.
Notes doctrinal and linguistic shifts (e.g., Fourth Council, adoption of Sanskrit) accompanying Buddhist divisions and the emergence of new branches.
A student could use this pattern to test which sects (Sthaviravadins vs Mahasanghikas/Sarvastivadins) were implicated in later doctrinal innovations like Mahayana by comparing their historical roles in councils and language use.
Records a historical ruler (Harsha) explicitly subscribing to the Mahayana school, illustrating that Mahayana was a distinct, identifiable school with historical patrons.
A student could use lists of known Mahayana patrons/centres versus lists of sect names (e.g., Sthaviravadins) to see whether Sthaviravadins appear among Mahayana supporters or instead among the older traditions.
States that the Palas were great patrons of Mahayana Buddhism, showing geographic/political centres of Mahayana influence.
A student could compare the geographic/political strongholds of Sthaviravadins (if known) with Pala/Mahayana centres to assess alignment or separation between Sthaviravadins and Mahayana.
- The passage explicitly identifies the Lokottaravadin sect as being of Mahasanghika lineage.
- That identification directly supports the claim that Lokottaravadin is an offshoot/member of the Mahasanghika school.
- The passage links the Lokottaravadin School to extant works counted among those from the Mahasanghika tradition.
- This association indicates Lokottaravadin belongs to the Mahasanghika lineage (i.e., is an offshoot/branch).
States Mahasanghikas were a major sect and that 'new ideas emerged among the Mahasanghikas', contributing to the rise of Mahayana โ indicating Mahasanghika openness to doctrinal innovation and the formation of later subโtraditions.
A student could use this pattern (Mahasanghika โ new Mahayana ideas โ subsects) to plausibly test whether Lokottaravadin, if Mahayana in character, traces its lineage to Mahasanghika sources by checking doctrinal affinities and historical accounts.
Notes Buddhism repeatedly split into various splinter groups (Hinayana, Mahayana, Vajrayana, etc.), showing a historical pattern of sectarian offshoots arising from earlier schools.
A student could apply this general rule of frequent schisms to seek historical records linking Lokottaravadin to an earlier school like Mahasanghika (e.g., lists of sects or council records).
Describes monasteries as loci of doctrinal study and intense conflict between 'orthodox and heterodox sects', implying institutional contexts where subsects and new schools (offshoots) developed.
One could look for mentions of Lokottaravadin in records of particular monastic centres or regions associated with Mahasanghika influence to test a lineage connection.
States that Mahasanghikas (with Sarvastivadins) developed 'new ideas' that led to the emergence of Mahayana, indicating doctrinal innovation linked to later devotional developments.
A student could check whether those 'new ideas' attributed to Mahasanghikas included doctrines that elevated the Buddha's status (by consulting histories linking Mahasanghika teachings to Mahayana soteriology).
Notes that the rise of Mahayana allowed representation of the person of the Buddha in human form โ a shift from symbolic to iconic worship associated with increased veneration.
A student could use this pattern to ask whether groups contributing to Mahayana (e.g., Mahasanghikas) also encouraged portraying the Buddha as superhuman or divine.
States that worship of images of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas became important in Mahayana, implying doctrinal and devotional elevation of Buddha-figures.
Combine this with the link between Mahasanghikas and the rise of Mahayana to assess if Mahasanghika influence plausibly led to deifying tendencies.
Describes an earlier phase where the Buddha was represented symbolically (empty seat, stupa), establishing a before/after contrast with later iconic worship.
A student can use this contrast to infer that any sect responsible for or associated with the shift to images likely participated in elevating the Buddha's status.
Notes that specific places associated with the Buddha became regarded as sacred, showing a trend toward sacralizing the Buddha's life and presence.
A student might extend this to ask whether sects that promoted sacred sites also promoted supramundane conceptions of the Buddha.
- Identifies Mahasanghikas as a major Buddhist sect and attributes 'new ideas' among Mahasanghikas to the emergence of Mahayana.
- Directly links doctrinal innovation within Mahasanghikas to the development of the Mahayana movement.
- States that worship of images of the Buddha and Bodhisattvas became an important part of Mahayana.
- Connects the practice of deification/iconic worship to the defining features of Mahayana belief and practice.
- Notes that the ascendancy of Mahayana allowed representation of the Buddha in human form, linking doctrinal change to image cult.
- Links artistic and cultural factors (Indo-Greek/Gandhara influence) that facilitated human depiction and veneration of the Buddha.
- [THE VERDICT]: Semi-Bouncer. Statement 1 is basic NCERT (History Class XI TN/XII NCERT), but Statement 2 requires deep ancient history knowledge or etymological guessing.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: The Second Buddhist Council (Vaishali) and the Great Schism (Mahabheda) between Sthaviravadins (Elders) and Mahasanghikas (Great Congregation).
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the 'Big 4' Sect lineages: 1) Sthaviravada โ Theravada (Sri Lanka/SE Asia). 2) Sarvastivada (Kashmir/Mathura, 'Everything Exists'). 3) Mahasanghika โ Lokottaravada (Deified Buddha, led to Mahayana). 4) Sammitiya/Pudgalavada (Believed in a 'Person/Soul' - controversial).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: Do not memorize all 18 early schools. Focus only on the ones that represent a *doctrinal shift*. Sthaviravadins represent 'Orthodoxy', Mahasanghikas represent 'Reform/Deification'. Any sect with 'Lokottara' (Beyond World) in its name must align with the Deification/Mahayana lineage, not the Orthodox one.
Mahayana arose from doctrinal innovations within Mahasanghika and Sarvastivadin traditions rather than from Sthaviravadins.
High-yield for UPSC: questions often ask which schools produced Mahayana ideas and how sectarian splits affected Buddhist development. Knowing the origin sects helps answer queries on doctrinal evolution, textual languages, and institutional centres.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
Sthaviravadins identified with the older/thera tradition (theravadin), representing the conservative stream contrasted with Mahayana innovators.
Important for comparative questions on Buddhist currents: distinguishes Theravada/Sthaviravada from reformist Mahayana. Useful across topics on sectarian labels (Hinayana/Theravada), regional transmission, and doctrinal continuity.
- THEMES IN INDIAN HISTORY PART I, History CLASS XII (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 4: Thinkers, Beliefs and Buildings > Hinayana or Theravada? > p. 103
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
Mahayana became influential and was patronised in parts of India (Nalanda, Pala realm) while Hinayana/Theravada became dominant in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia.
Exam-relevant for questions on religious geography, royal patronage, and institutional centres (e.g., Nalanda, Pala support). Helps link sectarian distinctions to patterns of decline, conversion, and cultural transmission.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 8: Harsha and Rise of Regional Kingdoms > Religion > p. 112
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 9: Cultural Development in South India > Society > p. 126
Mahasanghika, Sthaviravadin and Sarvastivadin were the principal early Buddhist sects from which later movements emerged.
High-yield because UPSC questions often ask about sectarian origins and lineage; mastering these sect names and relationships helps answer questions on doctrinal evolution and sectal offshoots. Connects to topics on religious developments, institutional history (monasteries, universities) and regional spread of Buddhism.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
Mahayana grew out of new ideas within groups such as the Mahasanghikas and Sarvastivadins, while Hinayana denotes earlier schools.
High-yield because many questions probe causes and consequences of the MahayanaโHinayana distinction; understanding which sects contributed to Mahayana clarifies claims about specific offshoots. Links doctrinal history to cultural transmission and foreign spread of Buddhism.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
Sectarian division and the post-Kanishka adoption of Sanskrit influenced doctrinal transmission and the formation of splinter groups.
Important for UPSC as it explains mechanisms of sect formation, doctrinal change, and decline; useful for questions on causes of religious transformation and comparative religious history. Connects to themes of reform, councils, and intellectual history.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Decline of Buddhism in India > p. 43
Mahasanghika was one of the early Buddhist sects whose new ideas contributed to subsequent developments in Buddhism.
High-yield for questions on sectarian evolution: explains the fragmentation of early Buddhism and links to later movements like Mahayana. Useful for connecting doctrinal change to institutional and regional shifts in ancient Indian religion.
- History , class XI (Tamilnadu state board 2024 ed.) > Chapter 3: Rise of Territorial Kingdoms and New Religious Sects > Buddhist Sects > p. 42
The Sammitiya (or Vatsiputriya) sect. While most Buddhists deny the self (Anatta), this sect controversially believed in a 'Pudgala' (Person/Entity) that transmigrates. This is a 'heretical' view often targeted in advanced questions.
Etymology Hack: 'Sthaviravadins' comes from 'Sthavira' (Sanskrit) or 'Thera' (Pali), meaning 'Elders'. Elders are conservative/orthodox. Mahayana ('Great Vehicle') was the liberal/reformist break *away* from the Elders. Thus, Sthaviravadins cannot belong to Mahayana. Eliminate Statement 1 โ Options A and D removed. You are left with B or C. 'Lokottara' means 'Supra-mundane' (Loka + Uttara). Who treats Buddha as Supra-mundane? The Mahasanghikas (as per Stmt 3). Thus, 2 and 3 go together.
Mains GS1 (Art & Culture) & GS2 (IR): The split into Mahayana allowed Buddhism to absorb local deities, making it 'export-ready' for China and Tibet (Sinicization). Contrast this with the rigid Sthaviravada (Theravada) which became the state identity of Sri Lanka/Myanmar (Cultural Nationalism).