Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. According to the Constitution of India, a person who is eligible to vote can be made a minister in a State for six months even if he/she is not a member of the Legislature of that State. 2. According to the Representation of People Act, 1951, a person convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to imprisonment for five years is permanently disqualified from contesting an election even after his release from prison. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 4 (Neither 1 nor 2) because both statements contain factual inaccuracies regarding constitutional and legal provisions.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: Article 164(4) allows a non-legislator to be a minister for six months. However, the eligibility to vote (18 years) is not the same as the eligibility to be a minister. To be a minister, one must meet the qualifications for the State Legislature under Article 173, which requires a minimum age of 25 years (for Legislative Assembly). Thus, a 19-year-old voter cannot be a minister.
- Statement 2 is incorrect: Section 8(3) of the Representation of People Act, 1951, states that a person convicted and sentenced to at least two years is disqualified from the date of conviction and shall continue to be disqualified for a further period of six years since his release. It is not a permanent disqualification.
Since both statements are legally flawed, Option 4 is the right choice.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a 'Precision Test' disguised as a simple Polity question. Statement 1 is a classic 'Age Trap' (Voter=18 vs Minister=25), while Statement 2 tests your knowledge of the 'Reformation Principle' in Indian law (bans are rarely permanent). If you mentally auto-corrected 'eligible to vote' to 'qualified to be a member', you walked into the trap.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Under the Constitution of India, can a person who is not a member of a State Legislature be appointed as a State Minister and is such a person required to become a member within six months?
- Statement 2: According to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, does a conviction with a five-year prison sentence permanently disqualify a person from contesting elections even after release from prison?
- Explicitly says a person who is not a member of either House of the state legislature can be appointed as a minister.
- Explicitly requires that such a person must become a member (by election or nomination) of either House within six months or else cease to be a minister.
- States a person who is not a member of the state legislature can be appointed as Chief Minister for six months.
- Specifies that the person must be elected to the state legislature within that six-month period or cease to hold office, reinforcing the six-month requirement for state executive appointments.
- Confirms the constitutional principle that a non-member may be appointed as a minister but cannot continue for more than six months unless he/she secures a seat in either House (here stated for Parliament).
- Provides a parallel Union-level formulation of the same six-month rule, supporting the general constitutional practice.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.