Question map
In India, Legal Services Authorities provide free legal services to which of the following type of citizens ? 1. Person with an annual income of less than ₹ 1,00,000 2. Transgender with an annual income of less than ₹ 2,00,000 3. Member of Other Backward Classes (OBC) with an annual income of less than ₹ 3,00,000 4. All Senior Citizens Select the correct answer using the code given below :
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 1 (1 and 2 only). Under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, free legal aid is provided to specific marginalized sections to ensure justice for all, as mandated by Article 39A of the Constitution.
- Statement 1 is correct: Generally, persons with an annual income of less than ₹ 1,00,000 (though states can increase this limit) are eligible.
- Statement 2 is correct: Various State Legal Services Authorities have extended eligibility to Transgenders; for instance, in many states/UTs (like Delhi), the income limit for them is ₹ 2,00,000.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: The Act does not specifically categorize "OBCs" as eligible based on a ₹ 3,00,000 limit. Eligibility is primarily for SC/STs, regardless of income, or other citizens based on lower income thresholds.
- Statement 4 is incorrect: Not "all" senior citizens are eligible; their eligibility is subject to income limits prescribed by respective State Governments.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Full viewThis question masquerades as a statistical nightmare but is actually a test of Section 12 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. You didn't need to know the exact Transgender limit. You just needed to know that 'All Senior Citizens' is false (they are means-tested) and 'OBCs' don't have a special higher bracket in this Act (unlike SC/STs who are exempt). Elimination kills options B, C, and D.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: Are persons in India with an annual income of less than ₹1,00,000 eligible for free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities scheme?
- Statement 2: Are transgender persons in India with an annual income of less than ₹2,00,000 eligible for free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities scheme?
- Statement 3: Are members of Other Backward Classes (OBC) in India with an annual income of less than ₹3,00,000 eligible for free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities scheme?
- Statement 4: Are all senior citizens in India eligible for free legal services under the Legal Services Authorities scheme?
- Explicitly lists as an eligible category: persons whose annual income does not exceed ₹1 lakh.
- Gives the income-based threshold used by Legal Services Committees and contrasts it with the Supreme Court committee limit, confirming the ₹1 lakh cutoff for ordinary committees.
- States that Article 39A provides for free legal aid to the poor and weaker sections, establishing the constitutional and institutional basis for free legal services.
- Describes the National, State, High Court and District Legal Services Authorities set up to provide free legal services, linking the income-based eligibility to the functioning authorities.
- Explicitly identifies transgender individuals as a beneficiary category for free legal services.
- Specifies the income threshold for transgender persons as less than ₹2,00,000.
- Restates the same eligibility criterion for transgender persons with the ₹2,00,000 income cutoff.
- Frames the entitlement under the Legal Services Authorities scheme as aimed at marginalized groups.
Gives the explicit income-based eligibility rule used by Legal Services Authorities: persons whose annual income does not exceed ~1 lakh (and a separate ~5,00,000 limit for Supreme Court committee).
A student could compare the stated statutory income cut-offs (₹1,00,000 or ₹5,00,000) to the ₹2,00,000 figure in the claim to judge if ₹2,00,000 matches documented thresholds.
Repeats the list of beneficiary categories for free legal services, emphasising income-based and special-vulnerable categories (disabled, victims, persons in custody, etc.).
One can use this pattern to ask whether transgender persons are explicitly listed among special-vulnerable categories or must rely solely on the income criterion.
Explains the constitutional basis (Art. 39A, Articles 14/22) for providing free legal aid to 'poor and weaker sections', establishing the principle that vulnerability or poverty justifies assistance.
A student could combine this rule with knowledge that transgender persons are a 'weaker section' to infer potential eligibility beyond strict income thresholds and then seek corresponding NLsA rules.
Supreme Court judgment declared transgender persons a 'third gender' and affirmed their fundamental rights, which signals official recognition of their vulnerable status.
Using this recognition, a student might reasonably investigate whether NLsA policy or beneficiary lists have been interpreted/expanded to include transgender persons as a 'weaker section' eligible for aid irrespective of or in addition to income limits.
Contains a multiple-choice item that pairs 'Person with an annual income of less than n,oo,OOO' and 'Transgender with an annual income of less than tz,oo,OOO' as candidate beneficiary descriptions, suggesting exam-material attention to both income thresholds and transgender status.
A student could treat this as an indication that some sources discuss transgender-specific income thresholds and therefore check official NLsA criteria for any separate numeric cut-offs.
- Directly states the eligibility of OBC members with the specified income limit for free legal aid.
- Specifies the exact income threshold (₹3,00,000) tied to OBC eligibility under the scheme.
An MCQ list of beneficiaries of Legal Services Authorities explicitly includes 'Member of Other Backward Classes (OBC) with an annual income of less than ~3,00,000' as one option, suggesting that an income threshold for OBCs is used in descriptions of eligibility.
A student could treat this as a candidate threshold to verify against the official NALSA/Legal Services Act rules or notifications to see if ₹3,00,000 is the prescribed limit.
Explains that National/State/District Legal Services Authorities provide free legal services to 'the poor and weaker sections' under Article 39A, indicating eligibility is framed by poverty/weakness criteria rather than only caste.
One could combine this rule with a presumed income cutoff (like ₹3,00,000) to check whether that cutoff would reasonably classify OBC persons as 'poor/weaker sections' under the scheme.
Defines 'means-test' and notes the 'creamy layer' concept for OBCs where an income limit is used to exclude better-off members from benefits — showing that income ceilings are commonly applied to OBC-targeted benefits.
A student could infer that Legal Services Authorities might similarly apply an income-based means-test for OBC beneficiaries and seek the specific numeric cutoff in official guidelines.
Gives concrete examples of income ceilings for OBC-targeted schemes (e.g., pre-matric scholarship eligibility ceiling Rs. 250,500; post-matric Rs. 1,00,000), demonstrating that different schemes set explicit numeric income limits for OBC benefits.
This pattern supports the plausibility that the Legal Services scheme would also have a specified rupee ceiling (so a student could compare the ₹3,00,000 figure to known ceilings and investigate official NALSA limits).
Shows that different schemes use varied income thresholds for eligibility (e.g., EWS income cut-off of ₹8 lakh), indicating that income limits vary by programme and are not standardized across all government benefits.
A student could use this to caution that even if one source cites ₹3,00,000, the actual Legal Services Authorities limit must be checked because thresholds differ between schemes.
This MCQ lists 'All Senior Citizens' as one of several candidate beneficiary categories for free legal services, implying senior citizens are commonly discussed as a possible eligible class.
A student could check the official beneficiary list of NALSA/Legal Services Authorities to see whether 'senior citizens' appear and whether any income/other limits apply.
States that Article 39A and the NALSA framework provide free legal aid to the 'poor and weaker sections', indicating eligibility is tied to poverty/weakness criteria rather than age alone.
Combine this with knowledge that 'senior citizen' is an age category to deduce that only seniors meeting 'poor/weaker' criteria might be covered; verify by comparing NALSA beneficiary categories.
Specifies that NALSA and subordinate authorities 'provide free and complete legal services to the eligible persons', signalling the existence of defined eligibility rules rather than universal coverage of any demographic.
A student should look up the formal eligibility rules/schedule under the Legal Services Authorities Act or NALSA schemes to see if 'senior citizens' are included unconditionally or with qualifiers.
Refers to the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (and its amendment), showing there is enabling legislation governing Lok Adalats and legal services — implying eligibility will be specified in statute/scheme.
Use knowledge that eligibility is typically set in the Act/rules to consult those legal texts for any explicit mention of senior citizens and any qualifying conditions.
- [THE VERDICT]: Solvable Trap. It looks like a 'Memorize the Numbers' question, but it's actually a 'Know the Categories' question solvable by eliminating Statement 4.
- [THE CONCEPTUAL TRIGGER]: Article 39A (Free Legal Aid) → Statutory backing: Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987.
- [THE HORIZONTAL EXPANSION]: Memorize the Section 12 Beneficiaries (No Income Limit): Women, Children, SC/ST, Victims of Trafficking/Begar, Mass Disaster Victims, Disabled Persons, Persons in Custody, Industrial Workmen. (Everyone else = Income Limit of ₹1 Lakh).
- [THE STRATEGIC METACOGNITION]: When you see specific numbers (₹1L, ₹2L, ₹3L), don't panic. Look for the Categorical Trap. 'All Senior Citizens' implies wealthy seniors get free aid, which violates the principle of 'welfare for the needy.'
The Legal Services Authorities regime includes an income criterion of ₹1 lakh annual income as a basis for eligibility.
High-yield for UPSC because questions often test specific eligibility criteria under flagship legal schemes; links constitutional policy to practical implementation and helps answer MCQs and mains questions on access to justice.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 375
Article 39A provides the directive principle requiring free legal aid to poor and weaker sections, underpinning the Legal Services Authorities scheme.
Crucial for interlinking Fundamental Rights/Directive Principles with institutional responses; frequently appears in polity questions on access to justice, welfare state obligations, and implementation mechanisms.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 374
Different legal services committees apply different income cut-offs (₹1 lakh generally; higher limit for the Supreme Court committee).
Useful detail for precision in objective questions and for framing balanced answers in mains; demonstrates how policy thresholds can vary by institutional level and affect access to justice.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 375
Free legal services eligibility includes an explicit annual-income cutoff (₹1 lakh for District/State Legal Services Committees; a different limit for Supreme Court committee).
High-yield for questions on access to justice and welfare entitlements: knowing numeric thresholds lets aspirants evaluate eligibility claims and compare district/state vs Supreme Court limits. Connects to schemes, legal administration and social justice topics; useful for direct factual questions and for grounding arguments in mains answers.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 375
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 375
Transgender persons were legally recognised as a distinct 'third gender' with fundamental rights protection.
Crucial for questions on judicial activism, rights of marginalized groups and gender justice: this concept links constitutional rights, identity recognition and entitlement to state schemes. It enables answering questions on legal identity, non-discrimination and policy implications.
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 90: Landmark Judgements and Their Impact > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY CASE (2014) > p. 639
The Constitution provides a mandate for free legal aid to the poor and weaker sections, forming the legal foundation for Legal Services Authorities.
Essential for essays and prelims/mains on justice delivery and state obligations: connects Directive Principles with Fundamental Rights and institutional mechanisms (NLSA/State/High Court/District authorities). Helps frame answers on access to justice, equality before law and institutional roles.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 374
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 374
Article 39A and NALSA provide the constitutional and institutional basis for offering free legal aid to poor and weaker sections of society.
High-yield for questions on access to justice and legal aid: it links constitutional provisions to institutional mechanisms (NALSA, State/District Authorities). Useful for GS papers and ethics topics on social justice and the rule of law, and for answering policy/analysis questions on implementation of legal aid.
- Laxmikanth, M. Indian Polity. 7th ed., McGraw Hill. > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 374
- Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 38: Lok Adalats and Other Courts > NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY' > p. 374
Industrial Workmen (Section 12(f)) and Victims of Mass Disaster (Section 12(e)). These groups are eligible for free legal aid irrespective of income under the Central Act. A future question might trap you by asking if 'Victims of Drought' are eligible (Yes, they are).
The 'Rich Uncle' Test. Statement 4 says 'All Senior Citizens.' Ask yourself: 'Does a retired billionaire get free government lawyers?' No. Welfare schemes in India almost always have a 'creamy layer' or income cap unless the group is historically vulnerable (like SC/ST/Women). Therefore, 4 is false. Eliminate B and D.
Mains GS-2 (Social Justice): Connect NALSA's mandate to SDG 16.3 (Promote the rule of law and ensure equal access to justice for all). Also, link Section 12(g) (Persons in Custody) to the issue of 'Undertrials' and prison overcrowding.