Question map
Consider the following statements : 1. In India, there is no law restricting the candidates from contesting in one Lok Sabha election from three constituencies. 2. In 1991 Lok Sabha Election, Shri Devi Lal contested from three Lok Sabha constituencies. 3. As per the existing rules, if a candidate contests in one Lok Sabha election from many constituencies, his/her party should bear the cost of bye-elections to the constituencies vacated by him/her in the event of him/her winning in all the constituencies. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The correct answer is Option 2 (Statement 2 only). This is based on the legal framework governing elections in India, specifically the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951.
- Statement 1 is incorrect: While there was originally no limit, Section 33(7) of the RPA, 1951, was amended in 1996 to restrict a candidate from contesting from more than two constituencies in a single general election or bye-elections.
- Statement 2 is correct: In the 1991 Lok Sabha elections, prior to the 1996 amendment, Shri Devi Lal contested from three seats (Sikar, Rohtak, and Ferozepur). He also contested from three seats in the 1989 elections.
- Statement 3 is incorrect: There is currently no rule requiring a candidate or their party to bear the cost of bye-elections if they vacate a seat. Although the Election Commission has proposed that candidates should bear such costs, it has not yet been codified into law.
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest previewThis is a classic 'Reform vs. Reality' trap. Statement 1 tests standard static polity (RPA 1951), while Statement 3 disguises a well-known Election Commission *proposal* as an existing *rule*. Statement 2 is obscure trivia, but it becomes irrelevant if you successfully eliminate 1 and 3 based on core concepts.
This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.
- Statement 1: What is the maximum number of Lok Sabha constituencies from which a candidate is legally permitted to contest in a single Indian general election under current Indian law?
- Statement 2: Did Chaudhary Devi Lal contest from three Lok Sabha constituencies in the 1991 Indian Lok Sabha election?
- Statement 3: Under Indian election law or rules, is a candidate's political party required to bear the cost of by-elections for Lok Sabha constituencies vacated when that candidate wins multiple constituencies?
- Explicitly states a candidate would not be eligible to contest from more than two Parliamentary or assembly constituencies at a general election.
- Frames the restriction as applying to both general elections and by-elections held simultaneously, indicating a legal/administrative rule.
- Refers to contestants being 'restricted to two constituencies', directly answering the question about the maximum permitted number.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.
Login with Google to unlock all statements.
This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.
Login with Google to unlock study guidance.
Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.
Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.
Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.
Login with Google to unlock The Vault.