Question map
Not attempted Correct Incorrect ★ Bookmarked
Loading…
Q37 (IAS/2023) Polity & Governance › Parliament › Money and finance bills Official Key

With reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. When the Lok Sabha transmits Finance Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it can amend or reject the Bill. 2. When the Lok Sabha transmits Money Bill to the Rajya Sabha, it cannot amend or reject the Bill, it can only make recommendations. 3. In the case of disagreement between the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha, there is no joint sitting for Money Bill, but a joint sitting becomes necessary for Finance Bill. How many of the above statements are correct?

Result
Your answer: —  ·  Correct: B
Explanation

The correct answer is Option 2 because only two out of the three statements are legally accurate under the Constitution of India.

  • Statement 1 is correct: Under Article 117, "Finance Bills (Category I & II)" are treated as Ordinary Bills regarding the powers of the Rajya Sabha. Unlike a Money Bill, the Rajya Sabha has the power to amend or reject a Finance Bill.
  • Statement 2 is correct: According to Article 109, a Money Bill (Article 110) must be returned by the Rajya Sabha within 14 days. The Rajya Sabha cannot amend or reject it; it can only suggest recommendations which the Lok Sabha may or may not accept.
  • Statement 3 is incorrect: While it is true that there is no joint sitting for a Money Bill, a joint sitting for a Finance Bill is not "necessary" or mandatory. It is a provision available under Article 108 to resolve a deadlock, but it is not a requirement for the bill's passage.

Thus, with statements 1 and 2 being correct, Only two statements are right.

How others answered
Each bar shows the % of students who chose that option. Green bar = correct answer, blue outline = your choice.
Community Performance
Out of everyone who attempted this question.
45%
got it right
PROVENANCE & STUDY PATTERN
Guest preview
Don’t just practise – reverse-engineer the question. This panel shows where this PYQ came from (books / web), how the examiner broke it into hidden statements, and which nearby micro-concepts you were supposed to learn from it. Treat it like an autopsy of the question: what might have triggered it, which exact lines in the book matter, and what linked ideas you should carry forward to future questions.
Q. With reference to Finance Bill and Money Bill in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. When the Lok Sabha transm…
At a glance
Origin: From standard books Fairness: High fairness Books / CA: 10/10 · 0/10
You're seeing a guest preview. The Verdict and first statement analysis are open. Login with Google to unlock all tabs.

This is a non-negotiable 'Sitter' from the core of Indian Polity. It relies entirely on the classic distinction between Article 110 (Money Bill) and Article 117 (Finance Bill). If you missed this, you aren't failing because of tough questions, you are failing because of poor revision of standard texts like Laxmikanth.

How this question is built

This question can be broken into the following sub-statements. Tap a statement sentence to jump into its detailed analysis.

Statement 1
In the Indian Parliament, can the Rajya Sabha amend or reject a Finance Bill transmitted to it by the Lok Sabha?
Origin: Direct from books Fairness: Straightforward Book-answerable
From standard books
Indian Polity, M. Laxmikanth(7th ed.) > Chapter 23: Parliament > Money Bill. > p. 248
Presence: 5/5
“After a money bill is passed by the Lok Sabha, it is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha for its consideration. The Rajya Sabha has restricted powers with regard to a money bill. It cannot reject or amend a money bill. It can only make recommendations. It must return the bill to the Lok Sabha within 14 days, whether with or without recommendations. The Lok Sabha can either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha. If the Lok Sabha accepts any recommendation, the bill is then deemed to have been passed by both the Houses in the modified form.”
Why this source?
  • Defines the Rajya Sabha's restricted powers regarding a money bill: it cannot reject or amend a money bill.
  • Explains Rajya Sabha can only make recommendations and Lok Sabha decides whether to accept them (so Rajya Sabha lacks final amending/rejecting power).
Indian Economy, Vivek Singh (7th ed. 2023-24) > Chapter 4: Government Budgeting > Finance Bill > p. 149
Presence: 5/5
“Appropriation and Finance Bills are Money Bills. These bills are sent to the Rajya Sabha for passing but it is on the Lok Sabha whether to accept any recommendations of the Rajya Sabha or not. Whether Lok Sabha accepts the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha or not the Bills are deemed to be passed by both the houses. During the Budget, to change direct taxes, amendment in the particular Act is required through the Finance Act.”
Why this source?
  • States that Appropriation and Finance Bills are Money Bills.
  • Allows application of money-bill rules (limiting Rajya Sabha) to Finance Bills by categorization.
Indian Constitution at Work, Political Science Class XI (NCERT 2025 ed.) > Chapter 5: LEGISLATURE > Special Powers of Rajya Sabha > p. 110
Presence: 5/5
“Powers exercised only by the Lok Sabha: Then, there are powers that only the Lok Sabha exercises. The Rajya Sabha cannot initiate, reject or amend money bills. The Council of Ministers is responsible to the Lok Sabha and not Rajya Sabha. Therefore, Rajya Sabha can criticise the government but cannot remove it. Can you explain why? The Rajya Sabha is elected by the MLAs and not directly by the people. Therefore, the Constitution stopped short of giving certain powers to the Rajya Sabha. In a democratic form as adopted by our Constitution, the people are the final authority. By this logic, the representatives, directly elected by the people, should have the crucial powers of removing a government and controlling the finances.”
Why this source?
  • Reiterates that the Rajya Sabha cannot initiate, reject or amend money bills.
  • Highlights the constitutional rationale that financial control rests with the Lok Sabha, reinforcing the restriction.
Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

Statement analysis

This statement analysis shows book citations, web sources and indirect clues. The first statement (S1) is open for preview.

Login with Google to unlock all statements.

How to study

This tab shows concrete study steps: what to underline in books, how to map current affairs, and how to prepare for similar questions.

Login with Google to unlock study guidance.

Micro-concepts

Discover the small, exam-centric ideas hidden in this question and where they appear in your books and notes.

Login with Google to unlock micro-concepts.

The Vault

Access hidden traps, elimination shortcuts, and Mains connections that give you an edge on every question.

Login with Google to unlock The Vault.

✓ Thank you! We'll review this.

SIMILAR QUESTIONS

CAPF · 2008 · Q35 Relevance score: 5.14

Consider the following statements : 1. No money bill can be introduced in the Parliament without the recommendation of the President of India. 2. The Prime Minister appoints Finance Commission for distribution of taxes between the Union and the States. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

IAS · 2015 · Q27 Relevance score: 5.13

Consider the following statements : 1. The Rajya Sabha has no power either to reject or to amend a Money Bill. 2. The Rajya Sabha cannot vote on the Demands for Grants. 3. The Rajya Sabha cannot discuss the Annual Financial Statement. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

IAS · 2003 · Q88 Relevance score: 5.06

Consider the following statements: 1. The joint sitting of the two houses of the Parliament in India is sanctioned under Article 108 of the Constitution 2. The first joint sitting of Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha was held in the year 1961 3. The second joint sitting of the two Houses of Indian Parliament was held to pass the Banking Service Commission (Repeal) Bill Which of these statements are correct?

IAS · 2024 · Q94 Relevance score: 4.91

With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements : 1. A bill pending in the Lok Sabha lapses on its dissolution. 2. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha and pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. 3. A bill in regard to which the President of India notified his/her intention to summon the Houses to a joint sitting lapses on the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Which of the statements given above is/are correct ?

CDS-I · 2005 · Q94 Relevance score: 4.76

Which one of the following statements is not correct ?